What's new

Chinese Navy (PLAN) News & Discussions

Maybe a stupid question and not entirely correct here, but does the PLAN also "Coat of Arms" emblem similar to other Navies ??

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unite..._the_United_States_Department_of_the_Navy.svg
coin not included.
timg


http://www.baidu.com/s?ie=utf-8&f=8...045&rsv_sug3=14&rsv_sug1=5&rsv_sug7=100&bs=海军


in case you want to use another image for something. ton of choices.
 
.
Latest news on 173 Changsha, remember East Pendulum claimed there were rumors it was floating in IOR due to engine falilure. He now claims new info that the ship was recalled back for disciplinary action, seems like the commander had some discipline issues. Btw, I found out his so called source, TW media. :lol:

According to the Up Media newspaper quoting a source from the Taiwanese army (?) , Destroyer 173 Changsha was on June 18 from China for the Baltic Sea. But for some unknown reason the ship would never have left the South China Sea and would have turned back towards the Fiery Cross reef to return to the Zhejiang naval base, Vessel is affected, by sailing at a speed of "22 knots".

This speed of the ship thus seems to rule out any serious damage to the propulsion system as claimed by another Chinese source, quoted in our article of 8 July.

The same Taiwanese source assumes that this early return would be linked to the disciplinary investigations that are currently underway in the Chinese army, and that one or more Chinese destroyer or flotilla officials would be involved, forcing the Chinese navy To repatriate the whole ship and have it replaced by another of the same class.

http://www.eastpendulum.com/histoire-destroyer-173-changsha

Use google translate. Most Indians were jumping in joy :bounce: and a few international outlets quoted the same East Pendulum 'news'.
 
.
Latest news on 173 Changsha, remember East Pendulum claimed there were rumors it was floating in IOR due to engine falilure. He now claims new info that the ship was recalled back for disciplinary action, seems like the commander had some discipline issues. Btw, I found out his so called source, TW media. :lol:

According to the Up Media newspaper quoting a source from the Taiwanese army (?) , Destroyer 173 Changsha was on June 18 from China for the Baltic Sea. But for some unknown reason the ship would never have left the South China Sea and would have turned back towards the Fiery Cross reef to return to the Zhejiang naval base, Vessel is affected, by sailing at a speed of "22 knots".

This speed of the ship thus seems to rule out any serious damage to the propulsion system as claimed by another Chinese source, quoted in our article of 8 July.

The same Taiwanese source assumes that this early return would be linked to the disciplinary investigations that are currently underway in the Chinese army, and that one or more Chinese destroyer or flotilla officials would be involved, forcing the Chinese navy To repatriate the whole ship and have it replaced by another of the same class.

http://www.eastpendulum.com/histoire-destroyer-173-changsha

Use google translate. Most Indians were jumping in joy :bounce: and a few international outlets quoted the same East Pendulum 'news'.
 
. . . .
No Pacific island base- how to maintain permanent PLAN presence in the eastern Pacific?

US has Guam and numerous others- not fair China doesnt have any.
The solution would be mega size sea-going mobile base in international water moving slowing along East Pacific(obviously this would be a target in war time, but in peace time no one can touch it).
 
. . . . . . . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom