1. My statement regarding physics is correct.
which statement ?
2. The high temperature at a high altitude excludes infrared detection by the warhead. We are still left with active radar or relay of coordinates from an external sensor.
errmmm forgive me , but NO, if your high temperature prevents IR, the same high temperature creates the re-entry plasma burn up field -which is the same that blocks communication and radar track of the shuttle- and hence the onboard RADAR cannot work...
so which is it?
If we are still discussing point number one then your citation proves nothing.
If we are discussing point number two then infrared detection by the warhead has been ruled out.
----------
I will give you one out of three points.
a. Your first graph was irrelevant. (0 point)
b. Your argument about the majority of friction-induced heating was wrong. (0 point)
c. I didn't know the significant heating started at 63km, instead of 10km. (1 point)
Still don't like you.
it is irrelevant to the truth if you like me or not .