Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh no ... via War is boring! What a piece of crap.
Although this article doesn't look too terrible, most "War is Boring" articles pertaining to the PLA (particularly those written by David Axe and Kyle Mizokami) are extremely unreliable and downright biased.What's wrong with the article?
J11b is still under construction.Any news on the J-16D? It seems like ages since we've gotten an update (apart from a couple photos by oedosoldier). The importance of the EW flanker cannot be understated. It seems apart from the J-16, it's been very quiet at SAC. The J-16D and J-11D seem to have gone underground
We have not seen new serials I believe ...J11b is still under construction.
What's wrong with the article?
...followingChina’s failure to get a license to produce that specific part and its own difficulties in producing clones of the original Su-27SK engines for the J-11.
What are the main differences in the air frames of the J-11, J-15 and J-16. And what is the commonality of parts between them.
J16 =Chinese Su30 MK2J-11 >> Chinese Su-27
J-15 >> Naval
J-16>> Chinese Su-30 MKI type
I think the J-16 is superior to the MK2. Has a better airframe, considerably better avionics, etc. Thus the MKIJ16 =Chinese Su30 MK2
I think the J-16 is superior to the MK2. Has a better airframe, considerably better avionics, etc. Thus the MKI
But that comparison is off since the J-16 uses a modified Su-30MKK's or MK2's airframe featuring NO canards and TVC-engines ... therefore this comparison.
No in the term of Capabilites and mission profile its more closer to F-15E/ F-18/EA-18GTrue. But I was talking more in terms of capability. Or presumed capability.
J-11B >> Su-30J-11 >> Chinese Su-27
J-15 >> Naval
J-16>> Chinese Su-30 MKI type