Chinese Air Force (PLAAF) News & Discussions

[Akasa]

View attachment 471523 View attachment 471524
SAC...

Sorry, but that claim is outright false.

The Sharp Sword UCAV demonstrator has already completed its developmental phase and is transitioning a combat-capable drone.
The J-16D & J-15D are all in testing and should enter service in a few years.
The J-16 is already in service.
The FC-31 allegedly will become the basis for the next-generation carrier-borne fighter for the PLAN.
The Divine Eagle URAV has been spotted to be under testing.
The JH-XX bomber is still in the concept phase so it's a bit premature to call it a successful or unsuccessful venture.

So, what exactly is the major disappointment here?

 

[LKJ86]

Sorry, but that claim is outright false.

The Sharp Sword UCAV demonstrator has already completed its developmental phase and is transitioning a combat-capable drone.
The J-16D & J-15D are all in testing and should enter service in a few years.
The J-16 is already in service.
The FC-31 allegedly will become the basis for the next-generation carrier-borne fighter for the PLAN.
The Divine Eagle URAV has been spotted to be under testing.
The JH-XX bomber is still in the concept phase so it's a bit premature to call it a successful or unsuccessful venture.

So, what exactly is the major disappointment here?

Can you read Chinese?

 

[Deino]

Can you read Chinese?

No ... and therefore I beg for a translation.

 

[Akasa]

No ... and therefore I beg for a translation.

The author of the post is complaining of the following:
- 4 of the pictured projects have Russian lineage
- 2 of the projects have not been approved
- 1 of the projects have just begun but the export customer was unsatisfied with it
- The final project can't even fool its own creators into thinking that it's good (bad translation, my take on it)

The rest of the post is just one massive dump on SAC in general, even though I need to point out that some of the statements are not in agreement with rumors from credible "big shrimps" & insiders.

 

[LKJ86]

The author of the post is complaining of the following:
- 4 of the pictured projects have Russian lineage
- 2 of the projects have not been approved
- 1 of the projects have just begun but the export customer was unsatisfied with it
- The final project can't even fool its own creators into thinking that it's good (bad translation, my take on it)

The rest of the post is just one massive dump on SAC in general, even though I need to point out that some of the statements are not in agreement with rumors from credible "big shrimps" & insiders.

SAC needs to do better.

 

[Akasa]

SAC needs to do better.

Based on what precedents? SAC has a far bigger workload than CAC as well.

 

[LKJ86]

Based on what precedents? SAC has a far bigger workload than CAC as well.

能力越大，责任越大

 

[Akasa]

能力越大，责任越大

那么你在抱怨什么?

So why are you complaining about SAC's apparent "incompetency" compared to CAC?

 

[LKJ86]

那么你在抱怨什么?

So why are you complaining about SAC's apparent "incompetency" compared to CAC?

爱之深，责之切

 

[Akasa]

爱之深，责之切

It has little to do with "love" for one institution over the other, but a clear look at the stated facts.

 

[LKJ86]

 

[Ultima Thule]

View attachment 471705
View attachment 471707

Fake @yusheng above pic is fake @yusheng

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

View attachment 471705
View attachment 471707

Sound like an hypersonic bomber to me

 

[yusheng]

i did not say it is ture, but give some ....
what is next？

 

[Ultima Thule]

Sound like an hypersonic bomber to me

more like hypesonic spy plane than a bomber like suspected AURORA and SR-72 @Kiss_of_the_Dragon

i did not say it is ture, but give some ....
what is next？

• So why you post if this pic are not true (Fake) and what is purpose to put this fake pic in PLAAF PIC THREAD @yusheng if it its not true, and give us the source of this pic @yusheng