we tried. in 1962, our army moved to somewhere 100km away from your capital, that is the results of more than 3000 of your soldiers killed in action.
Provide credible sources for the part which is in bold or dont spew transgressions of your mind.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we tried. in 1962, our army moved to somewhere 100km away from your capital, that is the results of more than 3000 of your soldiers killed in action.
Last year when the global financial climate was not that good, China made it clear to the world that China will never let Pak's international debt to overdue, who is going to provide you the same unlimited support?
Any kind of military competition bring about improvement. Look at US/USSR competition in nucelar weapon and space exploration bring about changes in weaponry improvement and space exploration.
I'm still wondering why India is building a nuclear subs when it still haven't build a diesel/electric sub???? A sub construction is very difficult already. India would be the first country in history to build a nuclear sub as its indigenous sub.
Any kind of military competition bring about improvement. Look at US/USSR competition in nucelar weapon and space exploration bring about changes in weaponry improvement and space exploration.
I'm still wondering why India is building a nuclear subs when it still haven't build a diesel/electric sub???? A sub construction is very difficult already. India would be the first country in history to build a nuclear sub as its indigenous sub.Faithfulhguy, I dont think there is a hard and fast rule on the progression of Submarine production.....
The Nuke sub gives us all the features that a Diesel Electric Sub would, but most importantly provides us the much needed "nuclear triad" that could be the ace up the Indian sleeve in case of a nuclear confrontation....
As is the rule of the game is to try to "one up" your opponent.....Pakistan at the moment with the procurement of U-214 German subs would have outclassed those in our current arsenal.....With the launch of the Arihant, we have surpassed the comepetion.....
Besides, the fact that one can only lease a nuke sub but not fit it with SLBM's required us to build indegenously...
Provide credible sources for the part which is in bold or dont spew transgressions of your mind.
yes, you won the 1962 war. now you feel happy?
don't forget to tell your mate that india won the 1962 war.
Any kind of military competition bring about improvement. Look at US/USSR competition in nucelar weapon and space exploration bring about changes in weaponry improvement and space exploration.
I'm still wondering why India is building a nuclear subs when it still haven't build a diesel/electric sub???? A sub construction is very difficult already. India would be the first country in history to build a nuclear sub as its indigenous sub.Faithfulhguy, I dont think there is a hard and fast rule on the progression of Submarine production.....
The Nuke sub gives us all the features that a Diesel Electric Sub would, but most importantly provides us the much needed "nuclear triad" that could be the ace up the Indian sleeve in case of a nuclear confrontation....
As is the rule of the game is to try to "one up" your opponent.....Pakistan at the moment with the procurement of U-214 German subs would have outclassed those in our current arsenal.....With the launch of the Arihant, we have surpassed the comepetion.....
Besides, the fact that one can only lease a nuke sub but not fit it with SLBM's required us to build indegenously...
If India feel that it need to have a sub that is more advanced than U-214, than Arihant is not the way to go. India should procur more advance diesel electric subs. Arihant look more like a test platform than a real sub as the reactors are not even installed. Also, US, USSR and China suffered major nuclear sub problems. Arihant is likely to harm or kill Indian sailors than counter U-214.
Why did China hand back all the territory it had captured in 1962? it could have kept it and that would have been the end of the dispute, instead it retreated, wonder why...
Why did China hand back all the territory it had captured in 1962? it could have kept it and that would have been the end of the dispute, instead it retreated, wonder why...
It is because PLA were scared. They all ran back.
If India feel that it need to have a sub that is more advanced than U-214, than Arihant is not the way to go. India should procur more advance diesel electric subs. Arihant look more like a test platform than a real sub as the reactors are not even installed. Also, US, USSR and China suffered major nuclear sub problems. Arihant is likely to harm or kill Indian sailors than counter U-214.
Why did China hand back all the territory it had captured in 1962? it could have kept it and that would have been the end of the dispute, instead it retreated, wonder why...