Fsjal
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2013
- Messages
- 1,579
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Here is an interesting article.
China's World: Philippines Looks to Revive U.S. Naval Base - WSJ.com
A piece from the article
"But bringing back the once-spurned Yanks won't be so simple. The reasons illustrate the way that China's rapid rise as a regional military power—one that now possesses fleets of modern warships, nuclear-powered submarines, ballistic missiles and stealth fighters—has reshaped the calculus for Pentagon planners in Asia since that vote to eject the American forces.
For a start, the Philippines itself would have to reverse a constitutional ban on allowing a foreign power to establish a permanent military base. But assuming that was possible, America still wouldn't be interested. Bases are potential sitting ducks for Chinese missiles. Plus, they are expensive. At a time of budget cuts, it's far cheaper to sign a treaty with friendly countries guaranteeing access for U.S. forces than to pay rent. In military-speak, America wants "places not bases."
Another interesting piece
"The U.S. is cautious about offending China for other reasons, too. China already feels encircled by a network of U.S. military alliances stretching from Japan to Australia. As numerous analysts have pointed out, China isn't the Soviet Union. It may be pushing back against U.S. military hegemony in Asia, but unlike the Soviet Union it's also an economic partner—America's biggest creditor and a key investment destination for U.S. auto companies, retailers and plane makers."
China's World: Philippines Looks to Revive U.S. Naval Base - WSJ.com
A piece from the article
"But bringing back the once-spurned Yanks won't be so simple. The reasons illustrate the way that China's rapid rise as a regional military power—one that now possesses fleets of modern warships, nuclear-powered submarines, ballistic missiles and stealth fighters—has reshaped the calculus for Pentagon planners in Asia since that vote to eject the American forces.
For a start, the Philippines itself would have to reverse a constitutional ban on allowing a foreign power to establish a permanent military base. But assuming that was possible, America still wouldn't be interested. Bases are potential sitting ducks for Chinese missiles. Plus, they are expensive. At a time of budget cuts, it's far cheaper to sign a treaty with friendly countries guaranteeing access for U.S. forces than to pay rent. In military-speak, America wants "places not bases."
Another interesting piece
"The U.S. is cautious about offending China for other reasons, too. China already feels encircled by a network of U.S. military alliances stretching from Japan to Australia. As numerous analysts have pointed out, China isn't the Soviet Union. It may be pushing back against U.S. military hegemony in Asia, but unlike the Soviet Union it's also an economic partner—America's biggest creditor and a key investment destination for U.S. auto companies, retailers and plane makers."