China’s Submarine Fleet, Evolution & news

[ZeEa5KPul]

Hey you guys, America didn't give permission to China to develop advanced naval technology. Tell Admiral Ma to shut down his projects.

"But quieter that U.S. subs? No.”

Yes.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Hey you guys, America didn't give permission to China to develop advanced naval technology. Tell Admiral Ma to shut down his projects.

Yes.

The Type 095/096 are already using this technology, since the Columbia class will start its construction after 2020, that's why Admiral Ma is confident to claim his technology being a decade ahead that of the US.

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

comparing this to EMALS. that's funny.

Nowhere near as funny as your country's naval engineers' total inability to build a simple linear induction motor. Perhaps you ought to send them all to remedial math classes.

 

[Gufi]

“Yes, something … if genuine. And there is no question in my mind that the undersea advantage we enjoy will come under increasing pressure from PLAN capabilities. But quieter that U.S. subs? No.”

@Penguin an analysis on both articles from your side. post number 1 and 7

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

The Type 095/096 are already using this technology, since the Columbia class will start its construction after 2020, that's why Admiral Ma is confident to claim his technology a decade ahead that of the US.

What does China think it's doing applying this technology before America -- without America's permission, no less! Doesn't it know that it's a law of the Universe that America #1? Who does China think it is!?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

What does China think it's doing applying this technology before America -- without America's permission, no less! Doesn't it know that it's a law of the Universe that America #1? Who does China think it is!?

His semi-submerged arsenal ship is even more jaw-dropping, with the 1000+ km railgun and a real power laser that can easily fry a large number of incoming ICBMs.

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

His semi-submerged arsenal ship is even more jaw-dropping, with the 1000+ km railgun and a real power laser that can easily fry a large number of incoming ICBMs.

It's bound to fail. America does everything first: America had the first jet fighter and the first ballistic missile. It was the first to send a man into space. Nothing can be done without America doing it first.

America #1.

 

[gambit]

His semi-submerged arsenal ship is even more jaw-dropping, with the 1000+ km railgun and a real power laser that can easily fry a large number of incoming ICBMs.

When it is on paper, anything WILL BE draw dropping. Or is it bird droppings...

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

When it is on paper, anything WILL BE draw dropping. Or is it bird droppings...

Why we have to make you believe it is true?

The Columbia class is scheduled to be built in the 2020s, but during the contemporary period, for the US to master the shaftless rim-driven pump-jet technology is still questionable.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

Surname Ma has existed long time ago before muhammad borns, I know u were joking, but this is not funny at all.

Both him and you are correct, because while the surname 'Ma' indeed long existed for more than a millenium before muhammad was even born, copious numbers of muslims in China, usually those not of Han/Hui ancestry- voluntarily adopted the very same surname en masse as it was a close phonological translation of 'muhammad' in Chinese.

It's the same context for the surname 'Li'

The Tang emperor bestowed the imperial surname on anybody he liked such as officials, generals or even commoners- and those same people would in turn also bestowed the same surname to anybody they like as the surname was considered to be a highly prestigious one during the Tang dynasty. Im a Li myself, but instead of naturally being born of 1 by virtue of lineage associated with the surname 'Li', my ancestors could have been bestowed with or even voluntarily adopted it more than a millennium ago. <===Chinese members here would easily understand the logic here.

 

[gambit]

Why we have to make you believe it is true?

You can take that article any way you like. The weasel word here is 'could'. It is open to interpretation.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

You can take that article any way you like. The weasel word here is 'could'. It is open to interpretation.

Compared to China's father of the EMALS/AAG and DC integrated electrical systems, who is the speaking with the weasel word?

 

[gambit]

Compared to China's father of the EMALS/AAG and DC integrated electrical systems, who is the speaking with the weasel word?

You think that just because you use technical buzzwords and acronyms that makes you knowledgeable ? China's next carriers planned to use the ramp. But even if China somehow make the EMALS operational before the US, show US how would that make China's carriers more combat capable.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

You think that just because you use technical buzzwords and acronyms that makes you knowledgeable ? China's next carriers planned to use the ramp. But even if China somehow make the EMALS operational before the US, show US how would that make China's carriers more combat capable.

The CV-17 still uses the ski-jump, but China is planning a CV-18 with the EMALS and AAG.

And the CV-17 and CV-18 are not even built in the same shipyard.

The CV-18 was supposed to start its construction in the Fall 2015, but it got delayed due the replacement of the EMALS to the original steam catapult, and the replacement of the AAG to the original traditional arresting landing gear.

 

[gambit]

The CV-17 still uses the ski-jump, but China is planning a CV-18 with the EMALS and AAG.

And the CV-17 and CV-18 are not even built in the same shipyard.

The CV-18 was supposed to start its construction in the Fall 2015, but it got delayed due the replacement of the EMALS to the original steam catapult, and the replacement of the AAG to the original traditional arresting landing gear.

The American carriers with their steam catapults would outfly and outgun China's carriers with their EMALS. You do not want to test that argument, son. It would go very badly for PLAN morale.