What's new

China's Nuclear Strike Force

The ENTIRE underground city was built for FREE by volunteers

Do not estimate the power of communism and communism's ability to create miracles

Underground City (Beijing) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The tunnels were built by more than 300,000 local citizens, including school children, and were mostly dug by hand.[2] Centuries-old city walls, towers and gates, including the old city gates of Xizhimen, Fuchengmen, and Chongwenmen were destroyed to supply construction materials for the complex.

is it the volunteers or the slaves of your own country who doesnot have any rights in their own country. those 300,000 slaves knows that if they say no to work this underground city will become their graveyard. thats how china treats their own people
 
is it the volunteers or the slaves of your own country who doesnot have any rights in their own country. those 300,000 slaves knows that if they say no to work this underground city will become their graveyard. thats how china treats their own people

The average Chinese has more rights than any indian in India.

For example: Freedom of thought - the thought that comes with being literate.

Freedom of movement - the freedom that comes with living in a country that doesn't have colonial era railroads.

Freedom of speech - so they don't have to talk about whether the next meal is coming or not.

And at the end of the day, those are what matter =)
 
The average Chinese has more rights than any indian in India.

For example: Freedom of thought - the thought that comes with being literate.

Freedom of movement - the freedom that comes with living in a country that doesn't have colonial era railroads.

Freedom of speech - so they don't have to talk about whether the next meal is coming or not.

And at the end of the day, those are what matter =)

Yes... on Paper Only..

Else You could Google ( Sorry you Cant.. as ur Govt. Restricts it .. The Reasons will only Dilute ur Logic....regarding "Freedom" )

And Find.. This abt India....

Part III - Fundamental Rights is a charter of rights contained in the Constitution of India. It guarantees civil liberties such that all Indians can lead their lives in peace and harmony as citizens of India. These include individual rights common to most liberal democracies, such as equality before law, freedom of speech and expression, freedom of association and peaceful assembly, freedom to practice religion, and the right to constitutional remedies for the protection of civil rights by means of writs such as habeas corpus. Violations of these rights result in punishments as prescribed in the Indian Penal Code, subject to discretion of the judiciary. The Fundamental Rights are defined as basic human freedoms which every Indian citizen has the right to enjoy for a proper and harmonious development of personality. These rights universally apply to all citizens, irrespective of race, place of birth, religion, caste, creed, color or Gender. They are enforceable by the courts, subject to certain restrictions. The Rights have their origins in many sources, including England's Bill of Rights, the United States Bill of Rights and France's Declaration of the Rights of Man.
The six fundamental rights recognised by the constitution are....

  • The right to equality
  • The right to freedom
  • The right to freedom from exploitation
  • The right to freedom of religion
  • Cultural and educational rights
  • The right to constitutional remedies

Rights mean those freedoms which are essential for personal good as well as the good of the community. The rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India are fundamental as they have been incorporated into the "fundamental Law of the land" and are enforceable in a court of law. However, this does not mean that they are absolute or that they are immune from Constitutional amendment.[2]

Fundamental rights for Indians have also been aimed at overturning the inequalities of pre-independence social practices. Specifically, they have also been used to abolish untouchability and hence prohibit discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, ***, or place of birth. They also forbid trafficking of human beings and forced labour. They also protect cultural and educational rights of ethnic and religious minorities by allowing them to preserve their languages and also establish and administer their own education institutions.

Therea are FULL DETAILS HERE :: Fundamental Rights in India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

IF U REALLY HAVE FREEDOM TO THOUGHT IN CHINA... LEARN TO READ FIRST AS U JUST STATED...

07121101_t.gif
07121101_f.gif
 
Last edited:
In recent years, China and India have been closely watched as rising global powers. In addition to their long histories and huge populations, the two countries share many other commonalities, such as impressive economic growth driven by market-oriented reforms. In politics, however, the countries sit at opposite ends of the spectrum, with China sticking to one-party rule and India taking pride in being the world's largest democracy. How will this difference in political framework affect the two countries' economic development in the future?

The experiences of countries around the world show that a strong correlation exists between economic development and the development of democracy. In fact, almost all advanced nations have adopted democracy as their political system. In contrast, undemocratic systems, including one-party rule, are commonly found in many developing countries. But we should take the view that economic development facilitates democracy through improvements in educational standards and the formation of a middle class, instead of the view that economic development results from democracy. The democratization in South Korea and Taiwan since the 1980s provides good examples of this.

Using the rule of thumb that the degree of democratization is proportional to the degree of economic development, China should now be more democratic than India, because China is a step ahead of India in its economic development. In reality, however, a comparative assessment at the world level shows the reverse is true. For example, in a report on the political rights and civil liberties of countries around the globe published in 2007 by Freedom House, a major U.S. human rights organization, among the 193 countries and 15 territories covered China is ranked 178th, far lower than India, which is 78th. In the report, surveyed countries and territories are grouped into three categories: "free" (89 countries), "partly free" (60 countries), and "not free" (44 countries). India was classified as "free," but China was placed in the category of countries that are "not free" together with the likes of North Korea (table 1).


When we plot Asian countries on a graph based on Freedom House's global rankings and global per capita GDP rankings, it becomes obvious that India and China represent cases of democratization that have occurred too early and too late, respectively (figure 1). The disparity between the economic foundations and the superstructure that has resulted from this situation is preventing the two countries from adopting economic policies consistent with their respective stages of development.


Undoubtedly, India is a democratic state in which citizens choose their national leaders by election. The country has also established the separation of the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches of government. While India's political system is close to the Western model, its economic system shows many aspects of a planned economy. The country has significant restrictions on economic activities in the private sector. In a mixed system like this, bureaucrats line their pockets by taking advantage of investment projects and their effective control over industrial development plans and market entry. When laws such as those protecting private property are weak, elections can turn into ceremonies vindicating corrupt politicians.

In India, the government's ability to expropriate land has become extremely difficult because of an excessive emphasis placed on individual rights. As a result, it has lagged far behind China in investing in such infrastructure as roads and airports. India has recently attempted to create special economic zones resembling those in China, but the plans have collapsed because of opposition by farmers who own the land.

Moreover, the right to terminate employment contracts is heavily restricted in India under laws designed to protect the rights of workers. Firms in India employing 100 or more workers are required under the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 to obtain permission from the supervisory authorities before they dismiss employees, commence layoffs, or close down. Applications under the law are rarely accepted in practice. From an employer standpoint, additions to a payroll must be performed cautiously given that dismissal is effectively impossible. Companies in India approach expansion very gingerly to avoid regulation under the law.

In contrast to the situation in India, infringements on the interests of citizens have emerged as a problem in China, which has been slow to democratize. The global downfall of communism has added layers to this problem, creating a need for political reform in China.

First of all, under the political system of one-party rule adopted in China, efficiency tends to receive greater emphasis in the pursuit of economic development than fairness does. In fact, the income gap is widening in China, and the growing disparity is beginning to threaten social stability.

Worsening environmental issues in China are also becoming increasingly difficult to resolve. As the Japanese experience suggests, in addition to the development of legal systems, a country must have scrutiny of corporations by citizens' groups and the media, along with fair court decisions if it is to resolve environmental issues. Satisfying these requirements is, however, difficult under a system of one-party rule.

In addition, as the only global power working to remain socialist, China is increasingly viewed as a monolithic presence in the post-Cold War international community. The country suffers many diplomatic disadvantages as a result of this growing view.

Finally, social values and interests are diversifying in China, as market economy initiatives advance and the economy develops. As a result of these changes, the country's established communist ideology, which calls for class struggle, has lost its appeal to the Chinese people. The Communist Party is increasingly finding itself in a position where it must seek new legitimacy to stay in power. The Party is now faced with the need to receive the baptism of fair elections as well as the need to institute party reforms, including changes to its ideology.

The Chinese Communist Party appears to think that political instability would result if it were to advance political reforms, such as democratization. However, the Party should take into account changes in internal and external conditions, and realize that the risk and the cost of choosing against reforms are becoming higher and higher.

SOURCE :: RIETI - Democratization: India is Premature and China is Overdue
 
Last edited:
Why do u guys ask qs. That prove u r more ignorant???

even US is trying hard to get the details from the Higly Reluctannt Swizz Banks...

If even u deposit a Trillion Dollars.. There is no way as of now..to get the details... The same applies for a corrupt politician be it in India or China.

BUT....We are talking abt 'Freedom' .. NOT corruption... Which exists in China.. India.. US.. Pakistan everywhere...
 
Why do u guys ask qs. That prove u r more ignorant???

even US is trying hard to get the details from the Higly Reluctannt Swizz Banks...

If even u deposit a Trillion Dollars.. There is no way as of now..to get the details... The same applies for a corrupt politician be it in India or China.

BUT....We are talking abt 'Freedom' .. NOT corruption... Which exists in China.. India.. US.. Pakistan everywhere...

corruption and freedom are extremely linked.

the more corruption a country has, it necessarily has less freedom. let me explain this:

no one wants corruption.
if the leaders are corrupt and cannot be removed, that means the will of the people are not being heard.
india has some of the worst corruption in the world.
 
On paper only? sounds like a pretty good discription of the incredible India;
Reality seems quite different with the so-called constitution of India.
(1) Freedom to oppress and discriminate its own people through the most evil slavery "caste-system" on earth?
UN says caste system is a human rights abuse - Telegraph
The oppression of 'untouchables' is modern India's shame - Herald Scotland
(2) Freedom to die before five?
5000 under-5 children die in India everyday: UNICEF - The Times of India
(3) Freedom to child abuse?
BBC NEWS | South Asia | Abuse of Indian children 'common'
(4) Freedom to host a child labor CWG?
Delhi's Commonwealth Games slave labour shame | Herald Sun
(5) Freedom to denial the basic human right of 650 million people access to toilets?
GovernanceNow.com | Open defecation ? India?s shame
(6) Freedom for extreme poverty?
BBC NEWS | South Asia | More Indians in 'extreme poverty'
So much for the "Freedom" of the so-called biggest "democracy".:whistle:
 

I think you are over exaggerating the benefits of freedom here, my country has its limit with regards to political freedom and other expressions of freedom no doubt (looking at your scale) but it has benefited the nation on a whole, plus I personally think the government has done a bang up job in running the country.

The CCP has long realized that the nation would never be as strong as it is today without the sacrifices of individuals for the greater good. If everyone clamored for their rights every time a railway or road is proposed nothing will ever get build.

A developing nation is sometimes like naturing a baby, would you honestly let your children watched unsupervised broad ranged cable tv & internet if they didn't know its ramification?
 
On paper only? sounds like a pretty good discription of the incredible India;
Reality seems quite different with the so-called constitution of India.
(1) Freedom to oppress and discriminate its own people through the most evil slavery "caste-system" on earth?
UN says caste system is a human rights abuse - Telegraph
The oppression of 'untouchables' is modern India's shame - Herald Scotland
(2) Freedom to die before five?
5000 under-5 children die in India everyday: UNICEF - The Times of India
(3) Freedom to child abuse?
BBC NEWS | South Asia | Abuse of Indian children 'common'
(4) Freedom to host a child labor CWG?
Delhi's Commonwealth Games slave labour shame | Herald Sun
(5) Freedom to denial the basic human right of 650 million people access to toilets?
GovernanceNow.com | Open defecation ? India?s shame
(6) Freedom for extreme poverty?
BBC NEWS | South Asia | More Indians in 'extreme poverty'
So much for the "Freedom" of the so-called biggest "democracy".:whistle:

Add To It ....

What abt Rights to Dilute Baby Milk and Give them Poisions MIlk ??

Waht abt Right to **** Katarina Victims ??

What abt Right to Create Terrorists ??

BUT YES YOU CAN NAME A COUNTRY ...

Which has a Billion Living More Peacefully Than any other Nation in Its Neighbourhood...

Which is Growing rapidly at 10% Annually..

Which Rivals Bigwigs lIke China and EU..

Which is Having Awesome Relations with Big Power Blocks...

Which Produces 100 Billion in IT...

Which is the Biggest Democracy...

Which is the ONLY Nation in SA to have over a dozen Nuclear Pacts....

BADs Exist in EVERY NATION its the GOOD which Counts...

IS THAILAND deprived of the Evils u mentioned in India ???



Come on... You Guys THink ANY NATION ON EARTH IS FREE OF THESE ??

Mr. MOLAWCHAI..

Name a Nation which is Free from Poverty, Corruption,Child Labour/Abuse , Lacking Basic Facilities.. etc etc....
 
corruption and freedom are extremely linked.

the more corruption a country has, it necessarily has less freedom. let me explain this:
no one wants corruption.
if the leaders are corrupt and cannot be removed, that means the will of the people are not being heard.
india has some of the worst corruption in the world.

Really ??

China at 79 and India at 84 ... Not Much of a Difference considering India is a Democracy and Thats a Huge Plus...

Atleast our RTI gives us the Freedom to even Trial and Question our PM's Each Move and Policy....

Corruption Perceptions Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Really ??

China at 79 and India at 84 ... Not Much of a Difference considering India is a Democracy and Thats a Huge Plus...

Atleast our RTI gives us the Freedom to even Trial and Question our PM's Each Move and Policy....

Corruption Perceptions Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


But you seems to forget or avoid the "caste-system" which is unique in India, don't tell me its only practise in a small part of India or the so-called law to abolish it, infact you bring that along with you even out of India. You know which caste you belong, don't you?
"Caste system"=oppression and discrimination base on caste.:tdown:
"Democracy"=equality and freedom for all. :tup:
Caste-system+Democracy="Caste-democracy" people vote according to caste line, you call that democracy? :no:
Stop bosting and lecturing other with your fake democracy period.:whistle:
 
But you seems to forget or avoid the "caste-system" which is unique in India, don't tell me its only practise in a small part of India or the so-called law to abolish it, infact you bring that along with you even out of India. You know which caste you belong, don't you?
"Caste system"=oppression and discrimination base on caste.:tdown:
"Democracy"=equality and freedom for all. :tup:
Caste-system+Democracy="Caste-democracy" people vote according to caste line, you call that democracy? :no:
Stop bosting and lecturing other with your fake democracy period.:whistle:

Caste system is a mere "improper" ( as of now ) divison of the socity.
Initially it was Based on Occupation.. now unfortunatey is more rigid..

BUT..

ever heard of Blacks and Whites..
Heard of Shia and Sunni ??

All these are Differnet Names of the So Called "Caste" system...

Sub divisons under a Single Religion... Dividing the People.

So Stop Lieing that its Unique to India.
 
Caste system is a mere "improper" ( as of now ) divison of the socity.
Initially it was Based on Occupation.. now unfortunatey is more rigid..

BUT..

ever heard of Blacks and Whites..
Heard of Shia and Sunni ??

All these are Differnet Names of the So Called "Caste" system...

Sub divisons under a Single Religion... Dividing the People.

So Stop Lieing that its Unique to India.


You can run, you can hide but please don't lie, do the above anyway compare to this? :undecided:
A fifth group describes the people who are achuta, or untouchable. The primordial being does not claim them. Untouchables are outcasts—people considered too impure, too polluted, to rank as worthy beings. Prejudice defines their lives, particularly in the rural areas, where nearly three-quarters of India's people live. Untouchables are shunned, insulted, banned from temples and higher caste homes, made to eat and drink from separate utensils in public places, and, in extreme but not uncommon cases, are raped, burned, lynched, and gunned down. :tdown:
 
The average Chinese has more rights than any indian in India.

For example: Freedom of thought - the thought that comes with being literate.

Thats why a Chinese is unable to use google,Facebook Twitter sitting in his own nation,he can not even watch foreign channels,because of high literacy and more freedom of thoughts

Freedom of movement - the freedom that comes with living in a country that doesn't have colonial era railroads.

definitely agreed, that always came from a land of great wall filled with 1000's of bodies of buried slaves their

Freedom of speech - so they don't have to talk about whether the next meal is coming or not.

They talk when they dont have food thats why the entire world know about,they dont have to hide in their closet here fearing an oppressive govt which can kill them for revealing this for compromising their super power status

And at the end of the day, those are what matter =)

definitely,definitely:china:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom