What's new

China's new strategic bomber: H-6K mass produced

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Nice 50 years old Tu-16. Very cutting edge:lol:

Yes it is , 50 years old assuming that China isn't capable of reverse engineering , innovation , designing and creating aircrafts ... :azn: But **** , what are J 10 , J 11 and J 20 - not to mention a **** load of copied aircraft then ? :undecided:

Before jumping on the bandwagon , why didn't you research a little ?

The H-6K, first flying on 5 January 2007,[4] entered service in October 2009 during the celebrations of the 60th anniversary of the People's Republic of China,[5] and is claimed to give China its first proper strategic bomber.[5][6] With a reinforced structure making use of composite materials,[6] enlarged engine inlets for Russian NPO Saturn D-30KP-2 turbofan engines giving a claimed combat radius of 3,500 kilometres (2,200 mi),[5] a glass cockpit with large size LCD multi-function display,[7] and a reworked nose section eliminating the glazed navigator's station in favour of a more powerful radar, the H-6K is a significantly more modern aircraft than earlier versions. The bomb bay has been replaced by extra fuel capacity, and six underwing pylons for CJ-10A cruise missiles are fitted. The rear 23mm guns and gunner position are replaced by electronic components.[7]
In January 2009, it was reported that an indigenous turbofan engine, the WS-18, was under development for use in the H-6K.[8]
 
.
whats wrong in it?
KH 55 seriously increased attack capability of TU 95
TU 95 MS, a variant of TU 95 is specially built to carry KH 55 cruise missiles
Defense network is denser on land when compared to sea . When Chinese mostly has border with most of the countries whats the point in launching Cruise missiles form air when they have land ? Tu95 was not meant for this century . Any strategic bomber except B2 is a white elephant and it can be shot down easily with long range SAMs and missiles like novator .:lol:
 
.
Better you concentrate on completing the 3 decade old project before flaming ... You mean like the minister of Gujrat who's plane was shot down inside Indian airspace ? :lol:

BTW , I heard the PLA chopper intruded somewhere again ? :rofl:
Please take care of drones and then speak about intrusion:P Dont be an idiot . know the reason for the crash of plane before making such idiotic comments .
 
.
LOL at indian inferiority. You can't even stop PLA combat helicopters from violating your airspace. :rofl: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/167005-pla-choppers-violate-indian-airspace.html
LOL at indian inferiority. india is just a third world hole that can't even manufacture a bullet. :rofl:
You should be in Guinness book of world records for having such a long Chinese wet dream . Still feeling humiliated for 1979? Curse your govt for not letting info of how many times we violated your space . Your govt dont care your opinion and thought it would be waste to tell you details . They are dealing soft with India because they are scared that we will give you the fate of your red master USSR of 1991 . Third world hole is better than a red hole . :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
man ur feeling hake of pain in ur a........ lolllllllllllllllll don,t worry get some medicine u b alright and don,t worry about what fate they meet
Its your a** that is burning . Why would i feel pain when you lose your aircrafts ? Grow up kid :P
 
.
yes man its dum..... Indian can fire shoulder launch cruse missiles and these chines are using bombers i agree with u sir :chilli:
To counter your nuke grenades we should have shoulder launched missiles/defence . Yes they are cruise missiles but they have very little range enough to destroy an F16 ie near . YOu know that we have 400km ranged A2A missile . Oh thats why Chinese are making bombers :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
I see a Tu-16. The only "improvement" here is the name.
 
.
it seems there is bonus distribution in CPC headquarter today.

:rofl::rofl:

Yes it is , 50 years old assuming that China isn't capable of reverse engineering , innovation , designing and creating aircrafts ... :azn: But **** , what are J 10 , J 11 and J 20 - not to mention a **** load of copied aircraft then ? :undecided:

Before jumping on the bandwagon , why didn't you research a little ?

The H-6K, first flying on 5 January 2007,[4] entered service in October 2009 during the celebrations of the 60th anniversary of the People's Republic of China,[5] and is claimed to give China its first proper strategic bomber.[5][6] With a reinforced structure making use of composite materials,[6] enlarged engine inlets for Russian NPO Saturn D-30KP-2 turbofan engines giving a claimed combat radius of 3,500 kilometres (2,200 mi),[5] a glass cockpit with large size LCD multi-function display,[7] and a reworked nose section eliminating the glazed navigator's station in favour of a more powerful radar, the H-6K is a significantly more modern aircraft than earlier versions. The bomb bay has been replaced by extra fuel capacity, and six underwing pylons for CJ-10A cruise missiles are fitted. The rear 23mm guns and gunner position are replaced by electronic components.[7]
In January 2009, it was reported that an indigenous turbofan engine, the WS-18, was under development for use in the H-6K.[8]

China does same like this to the original product.........

eeExY_St_81.jpg


Lol... And then they call it with some fancy name.
 
.
^^

The funny thing is that Indians cant even do that :rofl:

I see a Tu-16. The only "improvement" here is the name.

Are you the same who thinks two things are same just because they look alike ? :rofl: Gosh ! IQ theory is correct !

To counter your nuke grenades we should have shoulder launched missiles/defence . Yes they are cruise missiles but they have very little range enough to destroy an F16 ie near . YOu know that we have 400km ranged A2A missile . Oh thats why Chinese are making bombers :rofl::rofl::rofl:

Here comes a joker , try launching them at 400 km :rofl:
 
.
^^

The funny thing is that Indians cant even do that :rofl:


For Pakistan what is more funny is that till the time India 'cant even do that' it has money to buy 'that'. :cheesy:
 
.
Please take care of drones and then speak about intrusion:P Dont be an idiot . know the reason for the crash of plane before making such idiotic comments .

I will , let some beg to open supply route :rofl:

How many times have the PLA intruded all over the Line of Actual Control by the way ? :lol:

For Pakistan what is more funny is that till the time India 'cant even do that' it has money to buy 'that'. :cheesy:

Even Arabs have , so ? Are they successful and self reliant ? :azn:

You should be in Guinness book of world records for having such a long Chinese wet dream . Still feeling humiliated for 1979?

**** ! Aren't you for losing Aksai Chin ( 38 000 km2 ) and other areas and being butchered by PLA all along in '62 ?

Indians are very happy to bring some minor border skirmishes :lol:
 
.
^^
The funny thing is that Indians cant even do that :rofl:
We will make original one and you beg others for aid to buy them .
Are you the same who thinks two things are same just because they look alike ? :rofl: Gosh ! IQ theory is correct !
No he dont mean its a copy of Tu16 but even worse .
Here comes a joke , try launching them at 400 km :rofl:
then i would say to test your ICBM and Chinese Dongfengs .
 
.
^^ Dude, as I said till the time we are not we have the money, it does not have any thing to do with Success.. self-reliance will come slowly till that time we are prepared to defend and in the process have the best technology available.. Facepalm!
 
.
We will make original one and you beg others for aid to buy them .

No he dont mean its a copy of Tu16 but even worse .

then i would say to test your ICBM and Chinese Dongfengs .

Original one ? :lol: Try completing the project started 30 years ago and ill fated Kaveri then try to compare yourself with China which is completely self reliant in defense field :azn: I will spare you the INSAS dilemma :lol:

Whatever he meant , he had no idea what he was talking about ... :rofl:

Ohhh yeah , the " this is a copy of this " theory starting again :lol:

They are dealing soft with India because they are scared that we will give you the fate of your red master USSR of 1991 . Third world hole is better than a red hole . :rofl:

Actually , we broke that red hole once and forever :lol:

And that resulted in "

1991 Sino-Soviet Border Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why did your masters at Kremlin ceded land to China if they they had so won ? :azn:

According to the estimates by Boris Tkachenko, a Russian historian, the treaty resulted in net territorial gain for China, which received about 720 km², including some seven hundred islands. [1]
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom