China's most powerful 'killer mace' can instantly destroy the United States

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Good question! if it was just soooo easy to do, then what's stopping them? Probably the fact that Chinese civilization would also come to an end. Don't tell that to some of the extreme nationalists here living in a fantasy land though. They seem to think that their country is surrounded by some magical indestructible force field. Where it can just destroy any country it wishes with ease and not receive any retaliation at all.

Fortunately the "real world" operates a lot differently then the bellicose attitudes of some here in PDF. I say some because thankfully, there are many more level headed rational thinkers here then not.

We're stepping into the path of American exceptionalism.

 

[KingMamba]

Chinese are not warmongers!

 

[gambit]

Good question! if it was just soooo easy to do, then what's stopping them? Probably the fact that Chinese civilization would also come to an end. Don't tell that to some of the extreme nationalists here living in a fantasy land though. They seem to think that their country is surrounded by some magical indestructible force field. Where it can just destroy any country it wishes with ease and not receive any retaliation at all.

Fortunately the "real world" operates a lot differently then the bellicose attitudes of some here in PDF. I say some because thankfully, there are many more level headed rational thinkers here then not.

The more rational thinkers either fled the forum in embarrassment or never joined out of embarrassment.

 

[Mugwop]

I'd like you to elaborate on why your laughing?

 

[KingMamba]

I'd like you to elaborate on why your laughing?

They have been warmongering over petty islands for at least a year now, where have you been?

 

[Mugwop]

They have been warmongering over petty islands for at least a year now, where have you been?

Which islands and dispute are you talking about? The ones with japan or philippines ?

 

[KingMamba]

Which islands and dispute are you talking about? The ones with japan or philippines ?

They have dispute with every nation that has possession in the SCS as they claim everything within is historically theirs. Now go figure out how many countries does that equate too?

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

They have been warmongering over petty islands for at least a year now, where have you been?

Yeah we are warmongers, which is why we haven't had any wars or even any bloodshed on our borders for over 30 years.

Meanwhile America launched three invasions of the Middle east in the last decade alone. And there is constant bloodshed in South Asia on every border, just recently 5 soldiers were killed on the India-Pakistan border.

But no... we are the warmongers for avoiding war and bloodshed.

Even our incursion into India had no bloodshed at all, and we still got them to back down. They backed down and agreed to destroy their bunkers and stop all patrols in Chumar. Without a single bullet fired.

 

[KingMamba]

The more rational thinkers either fled the forum in embarrassment or never joined out of embarrassment.

So you admit to being irrational then.

 

[Wholegrain]

They have been warmongering over petty islands for at least a year now, where have you been?

It takes two to tango - everyone says China's started it because the other countries are smaller and more numerous.

both Russia, Austria, and Prussia wanted a piece of Poland during the partitions. They all worked together to dissect Poland until it became a nonentity. Prussia was smaller than Poland in both size and population. Am I to assume Poland was the warmonger because all the other nations were aligned against it?

 

[KingMamba]

Yeah we are warmongers, which is why we haven't had any wars or even any bloodshed on our borders for over 30 years.

Meanwhile America launched three invasions of the Middle east in the last decade alone, and there is constant bloodshed in South Asia on every border, just recently 5 soldiers were killed on the India-Pakistan border.

But no... we are the warmongers for avoiding war and bloodshed.

Even our incursion into India had no bloodshed at all, and we still got them to back down. They backed down and agreed to destroy their bunkers and stop all patrols in Chumar. Without a single bullet fired.

There is a difference between warmongering and outright war. Anyway the lack of bloodshed on your part is not because of any restraint on your part rather the countries you bully would much rather back down except Japan which is now considering to ditch the defensive provisions in its constitution so we will see what happens with that.

It takes two to tango - everyone says China's started it because the other countries are smaller and more numerous.

both Russia, Austria, and Prussia wanted a piece of Poland during the partitions. They all worked together to dissect Poland until it became a nonentity. Prussia was smaller than Poland in both size and population. Am I to assume Poland was the warmonger because all the other nations were aligned against it?

Comparing apples to oranges. China has instigated all these disputes because it now feels it is in a position of power to do so. China would be Russia, Austria, or Prussia from your example.

 

[Wholegrain]

They have dispute with every nation that has possession in the SCS as they claim everything within is historically theirs. Now go figure out how many countries does that equate too?

The Philippines not only claims the spratlys but Sabah in Malaysia as well.

Only France and China disputed the spratly islands (and both claimed the entire island chain) in the 1930s. No other country claimed it. Japan invaded the islands and after the Japanese were defeated in world war 2, the Republic of China was designated to receive the Japanese surrenders in the Spratlys. The Republic of China then established garrisons on the islands before Vietnam and the Philippines were even independent countries. The Republic of China (Taiwan) has the oldest military presence and claims on the islands.

After the Philippines obtained independence from the Americans, it claimed Tomas Cloma "discovered" the islands and started its BS claims on the spratlys.

Vietnam inherited its claim from France, the Philippines did not even inherit any claims from their American colonizers and their claims are pure legal crap.

The Law of the Sea and Northeast Asia: A Challenge for Cooperation - Hmi-gwOn Pak - Google Books

Where in the World is the Philippines?: Debating Its National Territory - Rodolfo Severino - Google Books

Vietnam Joins the World - Google Books

Spratly Islands (reefs, South China Sea) -- Encyclopedia Britannica

 

[rcrmj]

lol, where do you even find a article like this```its real $tupid, its like 三锅 style

 

[Wholegrain]

There is a difference between warmongering and outright war. Anyway the lack of bloodshed on your part is not because of any restraint on your part rather the countries you bully would much rather back down except Japan which is now considering to ditch the defensive provisions in its constitution so we will see what happens with that.



Comparing apples to oranges. China has instigated all these disputes because it now feels it is in a position of power to do so. China would be Russia, Austria, or Prussia from your example.

Japan started the dispute when Governor Ishihara (the racist former Governor of Tokyo who insulted blacks, Koreans, and chinese, and who also said women past menopause should "die" since they weren't useful anymore ) threatened to buy the islands.

Vietnam invites India to drill in the disputed areas, and the Philippines claims have no legal standing, they claimed the Spratly islands as Terra Nullis and supposedly "discovered" by Tomas Cloma, when the Republic of China and France occupied and claimed them.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

There is a difference between warmongering and outright war. Anyway the lack of bloodshed on your part is not because of any restraint on your part rather the countries you bully would much rather back down except Japan which is now considering to ditch the defensive provisions in its constitution so we will see what happens with that.

You have got to be joking.

Again, America launched three "invasions" in the Middle East (invasions of three Muslim countries)... in the past decade ALONE. Just the past decade alone.

Invasions, from halfway across the world.

South Asia has constant bloody borders, Hell just a few DAYS ago there were multiple soldiers killed on the India-Pakistan border. Before that, there were mutilations of dead soldiers and multiple beheadings. All within the past few months alone.

China's disputes on the other hand, we don't have soldiers getting their heads chopped off, we don't have cross-border attacks and killings, and we certainly don't launch invasions.

We've not had any violent clashes with any neighbors for over 30 years. All our disputes are diplomatic in nature.

Yet somehow, you say that we are the warmongers? If having no wars and bloodshed for over 30 years is warmongering, then your logic makes no sense.