China's KJ-600 photo leaked! The first Chinese Navy Carrier Based Early Warning Aircraft details exposed

[White and Green with M/S]

or you can learn from South Korea to copy F-22 and J-31. Don't be like other assemblers who just copy MIG 1.44.

lol.

I'm curious. How much do these assemblers misunderstand their own aviation industry?

Do you have comprehension issue you troll I'm not saying J20 is copy but uses design principles of MIG 1.44

Repeating the same wrong statement over and over again does not make it a fact. How did CAC develop a "long relationship" with Mikoyan when the Sino-Soviet Split occurred in 1960 and CAC was founded in 1970?

Are you capable of temporal logic and basic reasoning?

So CAC form in 70s so that's not rule out the possibility that CAC developed the relationship to mikoyan

 

[S10]

Do you have comprehension issue you troll I'm not saying J20 is copy but uses design principles of MIG 1.44

I literally have the chief designer's research paper right here:

https://www.engineering.org.cn/ch/article/20010812

And I literally posted links to J-9VI-II which predates Mig 1.44 by 15 years.

Mig 1.44 flew in 2000.

How does J-20 use design principle of Mig 1.44 when the program was started in 1990's?

So CAC form in 70s so that's not rule out the possibility that CAC developed the relationship to mikoyan

Are you that dense? China and Soviet Union was on the brink of war from 1962 to 1988. How does CAC develop a relationship with Mikoyan at that time? Nobody can be this stupid. Tell me you're trolling.

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

Do you have comprehension issue you troll I'm not saying J20 is copy but uses design principles of MIG 1.44


So CAC form in 70s so that's not rule out the possibility that CAC developed the relationship to mikoyan

Good baby. Now learn from South Korea to copy F-22/J-31.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

I literally have the chief designer's research paper right here:

https://www.engineering.org.cn/ch/article/20010812

And I literally posted links to J-9VI-II which predates Mig 1.44 by 15 years.

Mig 1.44 flew in 2000.

How does J-20 use design principle of Mig 1.44 when the program was started in 1990's?

MIG1.44 was being developed by mikoyan in early to mid 80s to replace MIG 29 and answer to the American ATF program

Good baby. Now learn from South Korea to copy F-22/J-31.

View attachment 928635

Do you have a mental problem???

South Korea worked with cooperation with Lockheed Martin so they are using design principles of both from F-22/F-35. But KF-21 is not a copy of F-22/F-35

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

MIG1.44 was being developed by mikoyan in early to mid 80s to replace MIG 29 and answer to the American ATF program

We hope you don't trust Western news too much. It affects your judgment and IQ.

Now you have two options. copy MIG 1.44 or F22/J-31.

Look, the assemblers' MIG 1.44

F-22/J-31 from other assemblers.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

We hope you don't trust Western news too much. It affects your judgment and IQ.

Now you have two options. copy MIG 1.44 or F22/J-31.

What is you're trying to say I don't understand??? MIG1.44 was in history and dead project

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

What is you're trying to say I don't understand??? MIG1.44 was in history and dead project

no. The assemblers are copying MIG 1.44.

These assemblers really liked the design rules of MIG 1.44

 

[White and Green with M/S]

no. The assemblers are copying MIG 1.44.

View attachment 928642View attachment 928643View attachment 928645View attachment 928644

These assemblers really liked the design rules of MIG 1.44

No they have been lots of design changes in these projects, MIG1.44 was not stealth jet had no weapon bays and had not a V stabilizers of stealth jets

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

No they have been lots of design changes in these projects, MIG1.44 was not stealth jet had no weapon bays and had not a V stabilizers of stealth jets

Although they are more like MIG 1.44. But do you think they're not copies?

of course. I believe the assemblers also like the design rules of the F-22 and J-31.

like i said. All modern fighters "reference" Chinese, American, Russian designs.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

certainly. I believe the assemblers also like the design rules of the F-22 and J-31.

like i said. All modern fighters "reference" Chinese, American, Russian designs.

Its just a coincidence that all 5th gen jets using design principles of F-22/F35, Su-57 doesn't uses a design principles of F-22/F-35

J31 is a dead project J-31 project is converted into J-35 which is quite different from original J-31

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

Its just a coincidence that all 5th gen jets using design principles of F-22/F35, Su-57 doesn't uses a design principles of F-22/F-35

J31 is a dead project J-31 project is converted into J-35 which is quite different from original J-31

really. All assemblers should be grateful to China, US, and Russia

 

[White and Green with M/S]

really. All assemblers should be grateful to China, US, and Russia

And why do you calling these countries as a assemblers ??? They are producing their 5th gen with help of US/China and Russia they are in the process of developing their own aircraft industries

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

And why do you calling these countries as a assemblers ??? They are producing their 5th gen with help of US/China and Russia they are in the process of developing their own aircraft industries.

Do you want to call them creators? Don't make international jokes. These assemblers still need to refer to the design rules of MIG1.44/F-22/J-31.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Do you want to call them creators? Don't make international jokes. These assemblers still need to refer to the design rules of MIG1.44/F-22/J-31.

Yes they somehow creator they study different designs with a help of USA/China/Russia and these designs are quite different from f-22/F-35 and don't refer t to MIG 1.44 and j31 these were dead project's now

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

Yes they somehow creator they study different designs with a help of USA/China/Russia and these designs are quite different from f-22/F-35 and don't refer t to MIG 1.44 and j31 these were dead project's now

Just like you said Lavi. Israel is just an assembler. All technologies of lavi are controlled by US. Israel does not have independent production capacity. As long as US does not provide critical technical components. Israel can only give up Lavi.... Poor assembler.

That's why I said. Only China, US, and Russia have an "independent and complete industrial system" in the world. Now China gives you the third option. You should thank China.