What's new

China's KJ-600 photo leaked! The first Chinese Navy Carrier Based Early Warning Aircraft details exposed

Is this strange? The modern aviation industry all is copied from the USA or from the Soviet Union.

China is the third option.

Only these three countries have "independent and complete industrial systems". There is nothing else
So you're denying that your J7/J 11/J10/J15/J 16/J 8/ Y20 and Z8/Z9/Z11 etc etc are not a foreign designs???
 
.
Lol LAVI and MIG1.44 was feng ru aircraft

Are you talking your medicines on time dude???

If you have some proofs than share to us

MIG 1.44 and LAVI project because of different reasons LAVI project failed because pressure from USA on Israel to not compete f16 in international market

As for MIG 1.44 was failed because there were no funds after dissolution of Soviet Union

Research the history before you post here dude

Lol give us the source/ link to your false claim in 60s you had no significant shipbuilding capabilities and your military was depending on Soviet military technology
Just like I said. Losers should not give yourself too many reasons. Don't give yourself too many fake medals.

If J-20 is a copy MIG 1.44. Why is MIG 1.44 not copy Feng Ru??? For example, they all have wings, wheels, and metal parts... besides. There is no similarity.

If Lavi is forced to give up just because of American pressure. This can only prove that the Israeli aviation industry is single and fragile, easily controlled by Americans. Lavi is just an Israeli assembly.

You need to watch less Western news. This affects your judgment.

Regarding 'Project 055'. It is a confidential project in China. It was designed in the 1960s.

Screenshot_20230510_091246.jpg


You can watch Western news. I just suggest that you don't believe too much.
 
.
So you're denying that your J7/J 11/J10/J15/J 16/J 8/ Y20 and Z8/Z9/Z11 etc etc are not a foreign designs??
They look more like MIG 1.44. isn't it?

Screenshot_20221222_094354.jpg

6D37080758106A99E28920CDC5D4F875ED7296A3_size41_w640_h427.jpg
777713176bfe5cc52947f72742cf2b16u5.jpg


The SAC product is a replication upgrade of Soviet products. But you said J-20, J-10, and Y-20 are copies. I guess you forgot that you are a replica assembler.
 
.
If J-20 is a copy MIG 1.44. Why is MIG 1.44 not copy Feng Ru??? For example, they all have wings, wheels, and metal parts... besides. There is no similarity.
I'm not saying J20 is a copy of MIG 1.44 but J20 inspired by the design of MIG 1.44 with lost changes
If Lavi is forced to give up just because of American pressure. This can only prove that the Israeli aviation industry is single and fragile, easily controlled by Americans. Lavi is just an Israeli assembly.
Once China was in the LAVI project that's why US pressurized Israel to close the project
You need to watch less Western news. This affects your judgment.
I'm not watching any Western news dude
Regarding 'Project 055'. It is a confidential project in China. It was designed in the 1960s.

Screenshot_20230510_091246.jpg


You can watch Western news. I just suggest that you don't believe too much.
This pic proof nothing unless you provide the source/ link and this is not TYPE 55 but PROJECT 55

Did it materialized or inducted in PLAN in cold war???

They look more like MIG 1.44. isn't it?

View attachment 928619
View attachment 928620View attachment 928621

The SAC product is a replication upgrade of Soviet products. But you said J-20, J-10, and Y-20 are copies. I guess you forgot that you are a replica assembler.
I'm not saying a copies you assume by yourself

I'M SAYING J20/J10/Y20 are inspired by MIG 1.44/LAVI/IL-76, C-17 with lots of innovations and changes
 
.
I'm not saying J20 is a copy of MIG 1.44 but J20 inspired by the design of MIG 1.44 with lost changes

Once China was in the LAVI project that's why US pressurized Israel to close the project

I'm not watching any Western news dude

This pic proof nothing unless you provide the source/ link and this is not TYPE 55 but PROJECT 55

Did it materialized or inducted in PLAN in cold war???
But I think they're more like MIG 1.44.

1155370546138478-01826287f9db5e4843c1e345fdb0334e.jpg
6D37080758106A99E28920CDC5D4F875ED7296A3_size41_w640_h427.jpg
777713176bfe5cc52947f72742cf2b16u5.jpg


You don't need to be too upset. Israel and you are all just assemblers. Lavi and your MIG 1.44 copy are all just assembled goods
 
.
.
You're in delusional, J20 is inspired by MIG1.44/ J10A and S inspired by LAVI program/J16 is inspired by Su-30 MKK and MKK2, only INDIGENOUS design you have is JH-7
Again with this ignorant crap. The basic layout of J-20 was an evolution from the J-9VI-II, which predates the Mig 1.44 by at least 15 years. China did not have the technical capabilities to make the design work in the early 1980's. Song Wencong (chief designer of J-10 and architect of the J-20 program) was a young engineer working in the program back then and he took inspiration from it in his later works.


J9VII-IIwindtunnel.jpg

611-institute-j9-vi-ii-a-predecessor-of-the-j-20-early-v0-0kfnhjfuuu1a1.png
 
.
Again with this ignorant crap. The basic layout of J-20 was an evolution from the J-9VI-II, which predates the Mig 1.44 by at least 15 years.


J9VII-IIwindtunnel.jpg

611-institute-j9-vi-ii-a-predecessor-of-the-j-20-early-v0-0kfnhjfuuu1a1.png
I'm not saying you didn't research your previous project to develop J20 but it has elements from MIG 1.44 bro
 
. .
H20 is my mistake I want to refer Y20 and I want to say 80-90% of PLA army aviation and PLAAF designs are based on Russian designs including Z-8/Z-9/Z-11 etc etc


So you denying that your PLAAF and PLA army aviation designs are based on Russian designs???
You are wrong too obviously.
 
.
I'm not saying you didn't research your previous project to develop J20 but it has elements from MIG 1.44 bro
That's unsubstantiated speculation usually cited by the ignorant. SAC is the institution that cooperated closely with Mikoyan and Sukhoi, while CAC was not. Guess which institute designed the J-20?

Even the intake positions are complete different. Mig 1.44 has belly intakes while J-9VI-II and J-20 both share side intakes. The only similarity is delta canard layout.
 
. .
KJ600 is rather similar in function and looks to the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye (AHE) of USN. Kudos to PLN for pulling this off, no easy feat....

Japanese also use this in their Navy. First picture is of a Hawkeye taking off from San Diego (MCAS Miramar). F-16N's in aggressor schemes also seen.

iu


us_navy_090713-n-2798i-005_an_e-2c_hawkeye_assigned_to_the_greyhawks_of_carrier_airborne_early_warning_squadron_vaw_120_flies_over_jacksonville_fla.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
That's unsubstantiated speculation usually cited by the ignorant. SAC is the institution that cooperated closely with Mikoyan and Sukhoi, while CAC was not. Guess which institute designed the J-20?
It is possible that both design institutions cooperated each other to design J20 And CAC have known to have relationship with mikoyan
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom