What's new

China’s disappearing farming land

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
Time for the government to address the issue and start massive reclaimation projects.

China’s disappearing farming land
CCTV.com

China’s Ministry of Land and Resources has announced new regulations on effective use and better conservation of land.

Although China is the world’s third largest country in terms of territorial area, only 13 percent of its land is arable.

Moreover, soil erosion and industrial pollution have meant that even that number is rapidly shrinking.

Key facts:
  1. Over 8 percent of China’s arable land is polluted.
  2. Nearly 30 percent of China’s soil is eroded.
  3. Around 27 percent of the land is decertified, affecting more than 400 million people.
  4. Desertification is expanding at a rate of 250,000 hectares every year.
Compounding the problem is the fact that even this limited arable land is often wasted on large-scale construction projects.

For instance, in a number of villages, land has been sold to developers to build golf courses in the hope of attracting tourists.

 
What are the government intend to do about it?
 
Fcuking developers and their pretentious golfing.

This article is depressing.

I think certain policies are being implemented but it will probably take time until a nationwide monitoring and regulation system that is effective is set up.

China's first environmental court inaugurated

China.org.cn

A special court for environmental cases was opened on Friday in east China's Fujian Province. It is the country's first such specialized judiciary organ.

The court affiliated to the Fujian Provincial Higher People's Court has recruited 12 environmental, agricultural, marine and mineral experts as technical consultants.

Entrusted by the court, the consultants can appear in court as litigation assistants to provide technical consultation and interpretation.

Wang Chengquan, deputy chief justice of the high court, said Fujian was approved as China's first "ecological civilization demonstration zone" in April to explore and pilot judicial protection of the environment.

Since 2009, several county and city-level courts in the province have experimented in setting up divisions specializing in forestry, mining, water and resources, atmosphere and water pollution cases.

Wang said the courts have explored judiciary measures of protecting and restoring the environment, which instruct violators of environmental laws to shoulder responsibility for reparations after environmental damage.
***

China to improve countryside living environment


The General Office of the State Council, China's cabinet, issued a guideline on Thursday vowing to "substantially improve" the living environment in the countryside by 2020 to build beautiful and livable villages.

The current living environment, including housing, hygiene conditions and basic infrastructure, still lags far behind and does not meet the general criteria of a "new socialist countryside," said the guideline.

According to the guideline, efforts will be put into housing renovation, construction of safe tap water facilities, village road improvement, electricity-grid upgrades, fighting pollution, and conservation of historic villages.

The government will lead the efforts and also include villager participation and social support, said the guideline.

It also noted that implementation of the guideline should adjust to local conditions and minimize damage in dismantling houses, felling trees, and other practices.

 
The problem will be tackled.

It is good that there is constructive national discussion on the issue.

Saving the Ecosystem
The revised environmental protection law provides a sound legal base for pollution prevention and control

By Yin Pumin

1400465304633.JPG

WATER EMERGENCY: Residents of a community in Lanzhou, Gansu Province, receive water allocated by the local government on April 11 after excessive levels of benzene, a carcinogenic chemical, was found in the city's tap water supply (ZHANG MENG)


On April 24, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC), China's top legislature, approved the most sweeping revisions of the Environmental Protection Law in more than two decades. The changes bring the promise of tougher penalties for those polluting the environment.

Environmental experts have welcomed the amendments, saying that they could not have come at a better time.

For the past 25 years, the law had not been changed since it took effect in 1989. In August 2012, a draft amendment was submitted to the NPC Standing Committee for its first deliberation, starting the two-year amendment process.

After heated debates and four readings of the draft, the much-anticipated revisions expanded the law to add 23 new articles, bringing the total up to 70. The additions ensure that environmental protection is enshrined as the country's overriding priority, and include specific articles and provisions on tackling smog.

The revised law will go into effect from January 1, 2015.

Chai Fahe, Vice President of the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, said that he was impressed by the new law. "With its long-term scope and legally binding solution, the amended law has prepared a sound legal basis for pollution prevention and control and will guarantee their implementation," he said.

Chai also praised the new law's clear stipulations on local governments' responsibility to ensure environmental quality and the accountability system that will punish those who fail to do so. He suggests that such provisions should be enforced with effective measures.

Chai added that the new law is also expected to advance amendment to other environmental laws, such as the Law on Air Pollution Control, which experts believe needs more detailed, specific and practical terms.

Legislations on air, water and soil pollution were included in the NPC Standing Committee's five-year legislation plan for 2013-18, which was released last October.

It's reported that a draft amendment to the Law on Air Pollution Control will be tabled for the first reading in the NPC Standing Committee in December, and the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) is working on a draft soil pollution control law. Preparatory work on a water pollution control law allegedly has also started.



00123f55b17b14e3af134e.jpg

(XINHUA)



Tougher punishments

Though pollution prevention and control have been on the top of the Chinese Government's agenda for years, problems still persist.

According to a report issued in April, nearly 60 percent of areas monitored in China last year had a "very poor" or "relatively poor" underground water quality.

Another report issued jointly by the MEP and the Ministry of Land and Resources on April 17 showed that about 16.1 percent of the country's soil is polluted.

Above all, heavy smog caused by industrial activities, coal burning and motor vehicles' emissions, which have frequently shrouded Beijing, Shanghai and other major cities across China over the past few years, causes the most concern.

Decades of rapid economic growth have taken their toll on China's ecology, while disturbingly lenient penalties have allowed for runaway environmental pollution, experts say. They warn that facing mounting public discontent over a deteriorating environment, strict implementation of the new Environmental Protection Law is more important than ever.

The latest round of reforms aimed at steering the country to transform its growth pattern is believed to offer a unique opportunity to address the issue.

At the annual full session of the NPC in March, Premier Li Keqiang "declared war" on pollution and pledged to fight it with the same determination with which the country battles poverty.

Echoing Li's declaration, lawmakers have hammered out harsher penalties for polluters and written them into the new Environmental Protection Law.

The law stipulates that enterprises will be named and shamed for breaking environmental protection laws.

According to the law, responsible persons will face up to 15 days in detention if they are found guilty of the following: Their enterprises skirt around environmental impact assessments and refuse to suspend production after receiving a ban; they fail to obtain a pollutant discharge permit but discharge pollutants, and refuse to suspend the discharge after administrative bodies issue a ban; or they shirk supervision through means including forging monitoring data or improperly operating pollution prevention equipment. The length of their detention will depend on the impacts of their violations.

It has also been stipulated that responsible persons should face the same punishments if their enterprises produce or use forbidden pesticides and refuse to make corrections.

Explaining the changes, lawmakers said that they originated from a desire to rectify the previously lenient penalties, which have caused severe problems for the environment.

00123f55b17b14e3af3650.JPG

CLEANER PRODUCTION: Workers upgrade a shaft lime kiln on May 7, 2013 in Tangxian County, Hebei Province, in order to reduce emissions (XINHUA)

Xin Chunying, Deputy Director of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee, gave an example during the deliberation of the new Environmental Protection Law, saying that it needs 500,000-600,000 yuan ($80,150-96,180) to alleviate and control pollution on a daily basis when running an electricity generator complex with production capacity of 100,000 kW. But if the power plant shuts down its pollution treatment equipment and does nothing to protect the environment, it may only face a 10,000-yuan ($1,603) fine, she said.

"The phenomena in which the cost for observing environmental legislation is higher than violating laws is frequently seen, causing environmental pollution," Xin said.

The new law states that organizations in charge of environmental impact assessments and supervision would bear joint liabilities if they are found to have acted fraudulently.

According to the law, local officials may be demoted or sacked, if they are found guilty of misconduct, including covering up environmental wrongdoing, falsifying data or asking others to falsify data, failing to publicize environmental information that should be made public according to law or failing to give closure orders to enterprises that illegally discharge pollutants. If offenders' behavior constitutes a crime, they will be held criminally responsible.

The law introduces a daily-based fine system without upper limits to punish offenders. As a result, if an enterprise illegally discharges pollutants and refuses to make corrections as required by authorities, it may face a fine that accumulates daily. In the past, such enterprises received only a one-off fine.

Hu Jianmin, Vice President of state-owned power company China Huaneng Group, admitted that enterprises may feel the pressure of harsher punishments under the new law. "Companies that are diligently following regulations will be least affected," Hu said. He added that the new law will also bring about new opportunities to transform and upgrade enterprises as well as for the development of the clean energy market.

Zhang Guozhi, Deputy Director of the Environmental Protection Division with the Taiyuan Iron and Steel Group in north China's Shanxi Province, agreed. "Enterprises that observe environmental regulations usually invest more in reducing pollution, and stiff punishments will get rid of the inappropriate advantages available to polluters, acting as a protection for quality businesses," Zhang said.

Bie Tao, Deputy Director of the MEP's Department of Policies, Laws and Regulations, said that the amended law has impressed him with its support for the research and application of environment-related sciences and technologies, and financial aid to help develop the environmental protection industry.

However, officials and experts also stress that a strict law requires strict enforcement and the whole society should be encouraged to combat pollution.

"Good environmental legislation only gets you halfway there. It needs to be implemented," Vice Minister of Environmental Protection Pan Yue told Xinhua News Agency in an interview on April 28.

Calling the new law "the most powerful environmental legislation in the country," Pan said that it could still fail without strict enforcement.

Class litigations

The number of environmental pollution cases in China has grown more than 20 percent annually since 1996, according to Sun Youhai, Director of the China Institute of Applied Jurisprudence of the Supreme People's Court, China's highest judicial body, at a forum in Guiyang, southwest China's Guizhou Province, last July.

Sun said that more than 300,000 letters of accusations related to environmental pollution were filed from 2006 to 2010, but less than 1 percent ended up becoming court cases, mostly due to vague descriptions in the previous Environmental Protection Law that defines who is eligible to file lawsuits against polluters.

00123f55b17b14e3af4c51.JPG

LAND RECOVERY: Workers decontaminate heavy metal-laden soil in Baiyin, Gansu Province, on October 16, 2011 (NIE JIANJIANG)


Earlier media reports also revealed that because individual citizens and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) do not have the right to initiate class action lawsuits against polluters, the dozens of environmental courts in China have almost no cases to process. In the meantime, environmental pollution continues to worsen in the country.

In a most recent environmental emergency on April 11, more than 2.4 million residents in Lanzhou, capital of northwest China's Gansu Province, were affected when excessive levels of benzene, a carcinogenic chemical, was found in the city's tap water supply. The pollutants were later confirmed to have leaked from a pipeline belonging to Lanzhou Petrochemical, a subsidiary of China National Petroleum Corp., the country's largest oil company.

Five residents in Lanzhou tried to suing Veolia Water Corp., the main water supplier in the city, for failing to guarantee its water quality and providing unsafe water after the incident. However, a local court refused to accept the case on the grounds that as individuals, the five people did not have the right to file the lawsuit.

Meeting public expectations, the new Environmental Protection Law allows class action lawsuits on environmental issues and expands the range of subjects for such litigations.

Zhai Yong, head of the Law Chamber of the Environmental Protection and Resources Conservation Committee of the NPC, said that legislators had debated over which organizations should be eligible to file class action lawsuits against polluters.

The new law lists three specific requirements for NGOs to be eligible for class action suits: They must have been registered with civil affairs departments of governments at city level or above over the past five years; they must prove they have been engaged in protecting the environment for more than five years and they must have good reputations.

Courts should receive class litigations on environmental issues in accordance with the law, while NGOs should not seek to profit through such litigations, the new Environmental Protection Law states.

"The change may raise the number of qualified organizations from less than 100 to several hundred," said Ma Yong, Director of the Supervision and Litigation Department at the Environmental Legal Service Center of the All-China Environment Federation, one of the most active organizations in the field of environmental class action lawsuits.

By promoting class litigations, environmental activists hope that the public's desire for a better environment can be addressed through the rule of law, instead of resorting to protests.

China has faced an increasing number of protests, sometimes referred to as "mass incidents," over environmental issues in recent years. A few cities have seen residents take to the streets against petrochemical projects, which they believe are a major threat to the environment and public health. In most of the cases, the projects in question were later suspended.

In a recent case, more than 1,000 people took to the streets in Maoming, a major Chinese petrochemical production base in south China's Guangdong Province, to protest against a paraxylene (PX) project in late March. PX is used for making a number of polyester products.

The PX project was approved in 2012 with an annual production capacity expected to meet 600,000 tons.

While hailing the new legislation as progressive, experts admit that difficulties remain.

"The requirement that qualified environmental organizations must have been registered with civil affairs departments for more than five years may be very hard to reach for many organizations because the registration procedure has been open nationwide for less than two years," said Yang Sujuan, Deputy Director of Environmental and Natural Resources Law Research Institute with the China University of Political Science and Law.

"To get involved with such lawsuits, an organization needs to have a professional team, including not only legal experts but also chemists," said Ma with the All-China Environmental Federation. "They may also need to be prepared to spend three to five years on one case."

Ma expects the number of environmental class action lawsuits across the country to increase after the new Environmental Protection Law is put into effect, but added that the total would not soar dramatically because "not many would be willing to spend such a large amount of money and time doing something as painstaking as this."

However, Yuan with the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee said that the standard has been set following international practices.

"Environmental class action lawsuits must be handled by professionals because relevant evidence is hard to collect. The prosecution must be familiar with environmental issues and have good social credibility," Yuan said.
 
That is always a serious problem.

However, there is just not a consistent policy that can be carried out from the top to bottom. Each district, county, city, province.. have its own interest, and the local interest interferes with higher level interest...

That is really tough problem to solve.
 
That is always a serious problem.

However, there is just not a consistent policy that can be carried out from the top to bottom. Each district, county, city, province.. have its own interest, and the local interest interferes with higher level interest...

That is really tough problem to solve.

Why not just fine companies 2% of their revenue if they are not following strict environmental standards in stead of just a fine.
 
If that works, we would have already curbed the corruption problems: just give a bullet to whoever takes/gives bribes...

Ok, just make the executive team from the polluting company drink the water. Case solved.
 
Its usually the effect in industrializing nations, the same happened to the United States as well as Western Europe during the Great Industrialization Era of the mid to late 19th century. One critical issue that China really has to deal with is the eutrophication of river basins, lakes and ponds , which negatively affect the fish population and even the native aquatic vegetation. I hope manufacturing plants are abiding by safety and environmental criterium. There are considerable health consequences to drinking eutrophied water including fungal infestation. At present, the problem of water eutrophication is still serious, with frequent occurrence of damaging algal blooms, which have disrupted the normal supply of drinking water in shore cities. Each destructive bloom caused a direct economic loss valued at billions of yuan.


References:

Eutrophication of Lakes and Rivers

Eutrophication a growing problem in China´s lakes CCTV News - CNTV English

Eutrophication of lake waters in China: cost,... [Environ Manage. 2010] - PubMed - NCBI

Ok, just make the executive team from the polluting company drink the water. Case solved.

Its not that easily solved, the purifcation of eutrophied waters requires the removal of the causitive agent, which in this case , the excess nitrogen and phosphorus metabolites from human fecal matter, industrial waste runoff into the river beds and soak into the lakes itself. This excess sodium , nitrogen and phosphorus produce an environment that allow the greening of the water, reduce the oxygen level in the water and literally starve fishes and plants inside to death.

The industrial causatives have to be removed, and proper purification plants need to be installed to limit the drainage of sodium, nitrogen and phosphorus metabolites. In the event that the fish fishes are destroyed by the eutrophication process, it might be necessary to re-introduce native fish species to produce the foundation of a health fresh water eco-system.

This requires strict enforcement of environmental laws.
 
Its usually the effect in industrializing nations, the same happened to the United States as well as Western Europe during the Great Industrialization Era of the mid to late 19th century. One critical issue that China really has to deal with is the eutrophication of river basins, lakes and ponds , which negatively affect the fish population and even the native aquatic vegetation. I hope manufacturing plants are abiding by safety and environmental criterium. There are considerable health consequences to drinking eutrophied water including fungal infestation. At present, the problem of water eutrophication is still serious, with frequent occurrence of damaging algal blooms, which have disrupted the normal supply of drinking water in shore cities. Each destructive bloom caused a direct economic loss valued at billions of yuan.


References:

Eutrophication of Lakes and Rivers

Eutrophication a growing problem in China´s lakes CCTV News - CNTV English

Eutrophication of lake waters in China: cost,... [Environ Manage. 2010] - PubMed - NCBI



Its not that easily solved, the purifcation of eutrophied waters requires the removal of the causitive agent, which in this case , the excess nitrogen and phosphorus metabolites from human fecal matter, industrial waste runoff into the river beds and soak into the lakes itself. This excess sodium , nitrogen and phosphorus produce an environment that allow the greening of the water, reduce the oxygen level in the water and literally starve fishes and plants inside to death.

The industrial causatives have to be removed, and proper purification plants need to be installed to limit the drainage of sodium, nitrogen and phosphorus metabolites. In the event that the fish fishes are destroyed by the eutrophication process, it might be necessary to re-introduce native fish species to produce the foundation of a health fresh water eco-system.

This requires strict enforcement of environmental laws.

I know, i was joking with my previous post. It's going to take time but will see improvements within the next decade.

It is very hard to carry out from top to bottom.
The 2% revenue fine is what Europeans are fining companies that break environmental laws, but not sure how tightly they implement that.
 
Back
Top Bottom