What's new

China's DF-31 missile stronger than Agni-III :IBNLive

pkd

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
1,432
Reaction score
0
India: China's DF-31 missile stronger than Agni-III

IBNLive India, television news network reported that the September 2, at present, more and more scientists began to question India's nuclear weapons power status, its nuclear forces and the growing gap between China: China's DF-31 missiles, 16 years testing 18 times , has become a very sophisticated means of delivery of nuclear warheads. In contrast, India's nuclear weapons transport vehicle is a far cry from its "Agni-III" missile tests carried out only three times, including for the first time ended in failure.


Reported that the most important, India has declared itself nuclear-weapon powers based on their six nuclear tests based on: one in 1974 and five in 1998. In contrast, the United States conducted nuclear tests in 1054, Russia 715 times, 192 times in France, China 45.

It further notes that in India there are also the transport vehicle with the same questions. After conducting two tests in India, they call it "Agni-II" missile could be put into use. In addition, so far, India's "Agni-III" missile have been carried out three tests, including for the first time ended in failure. On the other hand, China's DF-31 missiles have been carried out 18 tests.
 
.
Is this supposed to be a joke..Of course Chinese Missiles are far superior then Indian Agni, Rahul or Mehtha Missiles.
 
.
Reported that the most important, India has declared itself nuclear-weapon powers based on their six nuclear tests based on: one in 1974 and five in 1998. In contrast, the United States conducted nuclear tests in 1054, Russia 715 times, 192 times in France, China 45.

The scientists & Engineers of India are more talentsd than USA or China.The silicon valley of USA totally depends on Indian Software Engineers. We have proved our Talent on international level.

So we dont need to test our missiles thousands time .
NASA had to face several failure while establishing its moon satellite but Indian ISRO had established ite Chandryan I in first attempt.

Thats why NASA had congratulated Chandryan I team for its great success with surprise.

Thanking You:victory:
 
.
India: China's DF-31 missile stronger than Agni-III

IBNLive India, television news network reported that the September 2, at present, more and more scientists began to question India's nuclear weapons power status, its nuclear forces and the growing gap between China: China's DF-31 missiles, 16 years testing 18 times , has become a very sophisticated means of delivery of nuclear warheads. In contrast, India's nuclear weapons transport vehicle is a far cry from its "Agni-III" missile tests carried out only three times, including for the first time ended in failure.


Reported that the most important, India has declared itself nuclear-weapon powers based on their six nuclear tests based on: one in 1974 and five in 1998. In contrast, the United States conducted nuclear tests in 1054, Russia 715 times, 192 times in France, China 45.

It further notes that in India there are also the transport vehicle with the same questions. After conducting two tests in India, they call it "Agni-II" missile could be put into use. In addition, so far, India's "Agni-III" missile have been carried out three tests, including for the first time ended in failure. On the other hand, China's DF-31 missiles have been carried out 18 tests.

and addition
pakistan missiles are even better than china df-31 becuse there is no a single failure in testing :azn:
 
. .
& there are ppl who are jealous of Pakistani missiles coz they never failed & and............
They like to drag in Pakistan in every Thread to divert the topic :coffee:

we are not the only one jealous ,even america , Russia , even china because ,if there is no failure then just how much money and time will be save .
:azn::)
 
.
we are not the only one jealous ,even america , Russia , even china because ,if there is no failure then just how much money and time will be save .
:azn::)

Yes exactly we save money but still our Missiles are effective & operational...

Anyways can we talk about DF-31 & super duper the one & only non operational Agni-III
 
.
You can never compare china and India in technology, We are just growing up, China is already a mini superpower... Infact chinese are more superior than USA to be frank, No one knows the real Number of Arms China has, Thats The secrecy they maintain.... Now they are gonna Release some 50 new Indiginious Weapons on there national day, No country has ever been able to work so hard...


On the other hand, India despite its poverty is able to Grow and dream of becoming a global power, We have the courage to dream about that, After all progress is to those who dream... I would like to show you all a small video, please do See It, How India Evolved .

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
DF-31



The newest generation of Chinese strategic missile, including the Dong Feng-31, will narrow the gap between current Chinese, US and Russian ballistic missile designs. This system is a solid-fueled, three-stage mobile missile with a range of 8000 km carrying a 700 kg, one-megaton warhead. The DF-31 limited-range ICBM will give China a major strike capability that will be difficult to counterattack at any stage of its operation, from pre-flight mobile operations through terminal flight phases. As with the JL-1/DF-21 combination, the DF-31 and JL-2 are land-based and sea-based variants of the same missile. The cancelled DF-25 conventionally armed IRBM was to have been based on the first two stages of the DF-31, and the DF-41 long-range ICBM will use these two stages with a large-diameter third stage. Development of these missiles was accelerated following the successful test of their common 2m-diameter solid rocket motor in late 1983. The missile is apparently comparable in size and performance to the American TRIDENT C-4 long-range multiple-warhead three-stage solid fuel missile missile that is launched from submerged submarines.

The DF-31 has a range of about 5,000 miles, sufficient to hit targets along the entire West Coast of the United States and in several northern Rocky Mountain states. It is believed to incorporate design aspects similar to those of current generation Russian missiles. These could include upgraded mobility for the transporter-erector launcher [TEL], advanced materials for the booster and payload, use of penetration aids such as decoys or chaff, and an improved solid propellant.

The DF-31 is being jointly developed by China Aerospace Corporation, the research institute of the 2d Artillery Corps, and other scientific research organizations. In March 1991 the CMC assigned the task of developing and testing the DF-31 to the Second Artillery Corps, since the new missile was expected to have a limited operational capability as soon as its design was finalized.

The DF-31 development program is highly ambitious, and has presented Beijing with substantial challenges. China has experienced difficulties in casting the large solid fuel motors for the DF-31, and ensuring an adequate seal between the fuel and the booster casing. The DF-31 is in the late stage of development following various delays, and is expected to be deployed about the turn of the century, based on the recent completion of silo construction at the Wuzhai Missile and Space Test Center. As of 1996 it was expected that the DF-31 would enter full service by 1998. By 1999 it was evident that operational deployment of the DF-31 was expected as early as 2002 or 2003.

The details of the testing history of the DF-31 remain obscure. While the open source literature contains a number of references to tests associated with the DF-31 program, as of 1998 the National Air Intelligence Center characterized the DF-31 as "not yet tested." Given the evident challenges associated with the DF-31 program, and the variety of operational missiles that are expected to derive from this development effort, it is plausible that there have been a number of flight tests of components associated with the DF-31 prior to an all-up full range test of the complete DF-31 missile.

It is reported that the new missile was test-fired for the first time on 29 April 1992. Because of quality problems in its components, the missile exploded after launch. The second launch also failed due to similar problems. Subsequently four other missiles were test-fired successfully, beginning in June 1995. Tests on 10 November 1995 and 10 January 1996 possibly included endoatmospheric reentry decoys. The fourth successful flight test of the DF-31 was conducted on December 28, 1996 from the Shanxi base in central China.

The missile was observed on a launch pad at Wuzhai in mid-October 1997, and a flight test was conducted soon thereafter. In October 1997 the DF-31 also underwent tests simulating launch from nuclear-missile-submarine tubes. An "ejection" (soft launch) test was conducted in December 1998. On 02 August 1999 China successfully tested a DF-31 launched from the PLA Second Artillery base in Wuzhai Prefecture (Shanxi Province), with impact point somewhere in Lop Nor (Xinjiang Province). Chinese preparations for the DF-31 test began during the second half of 1998. The US deployed the tracking ship USS Observation Island to the Western Pacific to monitor the launch, but the PRC missile was not fired seaward.

The 50th Anniversary National Day parade on 01 October 1999, the largest in the past half a century, featured advanced weapons and equipment involving 11,000 soldiers in 17 ground phalanxes and 25 vehicles formations, and ten echelons consisting of 132 warplanes. The DF-31 was included in the parade, though it was in a large cannister that completely enclosed the missile.

Once DF-31 deployment begins, China is expected to decommission its CSS-3 ICBMs. China will then be on its way to a ballistic missile force based around road-mobile systems which will greatly improve Chinese nuclear ballistic missile survivability and will complicate the task of defeating the Chinese threat.

Improved mobility is needed for the DF-31 TEL. Currently this TEL is probably restricted to improved surfaces. Improved chassis features will in turn improve off-road capabilities, increasing the number of potential deployment locations. Such improvements will increase system survivability by making the missile more difficult to locate. US intelligence has photographed a Belarussian six-axle mobile missile TEL [transporter-erector launcher] at the DF-31 production facility in Nanyuan, near Beijing. The Belarussian MAZ launcher is the chassis used for former Soviet SS-20 intermediate-range ballistic missiles. The mobility of the MAZ vehicle is significantly better than that of heavy Chinese vehicles. It is unlikely the Chinese will simply convert the Belarussian launcher to a DF-31 launcher, but rather they would probably will adopt some of its features, including all-wheel independent suspension, higher ground clearance, driver-controlled central tire-inflation systems, and large tires. The Chinese will probably reverse-engineer the MAZ vehicle to better understand its superior characteristics, which can then be incorporated into the existing DF-31 TEL [transporter-erector launcher] design to enhance its mobility and performance.
The DF-41, a 3-stage 12,000km-range missile similar to the American Minuteman and the Russian Topol SS-25, will apparently be developed using the first two stages of the DF-31 along with a much larger third stage. The larger third stage and longer range of the DF-41 is made possible by the fact that, unlike the DF-31, the size of the DF-41 is not constrained by the requirement that it be fitted into a submarine launch tube. The cancelled 1,700km-range DF-25 ground mobile missile was developed using the first two stages of the DF-31.

Contractor Academy of Rocket Motors Technology - ARMT
Operator Second Artillery Corps
# Basing Tai-Hang
# Wuzhai
Configuration Three Stage
Length [meters] 10+
Diameter [meters] 2.0
Mass [kilograms] 20,000+
Propellant Solid
Guidance Inertial
First Flight 29 April 1992
IOC 2000
Deployment Mobile
Range (km) 3,000 - 8,000
Re-entry Vehicle Mass (kg) 700 kg
Warhead Yield 1 @ 0.35 - 1.0 MT or
3 @ 50-100 KT
CEP (meters) 300-500 ??
Launch Preparation Time 10-15

DF-31 - China Nuclear Forces
 
. .
India: China's DF-31 missile stronger than Agni-III

IBNLive India, television news network reported that the September 2, at present, more and more scientists began to question India's nuclear weapons power status, its nuclear forces and the growing gap between China: China's DF-31 missiles, 16 years testing 18 times , has become a very sophisticated means of delivery of nuclear warheads. In contrast, India's nuclear weapons transport vehicle is a far cry from its "Agni-III" missile tests carried out only three times, including for the first time ended in failure.


Reported that the most important, India has declared itself nuclear-weapon powers based on their six nuclear tests based on: one in 1974 and five in 1998. In contrast, the United States conducted nuclear tests in 1054, Russia 715 times, 192 times in France, China 45.

It further notes that in India there are also the transport vehicle with the same questions. After conducting two tests in India, they call it "Agni-II" missile could be put into use. In addition, so far, India's "Agni-III" missile have been carried out three tests, including for the first time ended in failure. On the other hand, China's DF-31 missiles have been carried out 18 tests.

Nobody is denying that China is ahead of us. But we are also catching up. India has also decided to start developing Agni V. Those who know least bit of geopolitics/stretegy, understands that Agni III is ready. Our armed forces don't have to attack China. They just have to deter them. This would serve the purpose. But I wish people undermine India's capabilities.

Coming soon: Agni-V, the last in Agni series

As the neclear tests are concerned, it is a well established fact that "India is a nuclear power". Please check yourself. Recent reports are concerned with nuclear fusion (for Hydrogen bomb), not for fission device. BTW, with the same logic, how can Pakistan be referred as nuclear power with just a single test.:what::what:

Lastly, I see that third para is same as the first one. Or I am dreaming?:cheers:
 
.
Yes exactly we save money but still our Missiles are effective & operational...

Anyways can we talk about DF-31 & super duper the one & only non operational Agni-III

Mam if you can please bring information on DF-31 against Patriotic-3? The reason i said patriotic-3 because indian anti-missile AAD is in same leaque. So i would love to know DF-31 against patriotic-3. Missile cant be superior until it ducks anti-missile. Even russia was worried about patriotic anti-missile system in europe because russia knew what patriotic capable of. Mam please if u have information how DF-31 can counter patriotic-3 and AAD by 2012. Thank you in advance mam.
 
.
Our armed forces don't have to attack anyone or to kill a dozen of million people. They just have to deter them. dongfeng-31A would serve the purpose.

A different point is that the country we have to deter is the united states, so the missile got to be capable to fly across the pacific and penatrate their defense. sinse our american friends are developing NMD systems, we have no choice but to increase the numbers of DFs and enhance their quality.
 
.
Our armed forces don't have to attack anyone or to kill a dozen of million people. They just have to deter them. dongfeng-31A would serve the purpose.

A different point is that the country we have to deter is the united states, so the missile got to be capable to fly across the pacific and penatrate their defense. sinse our american friends are developing NMD systems, we have no choice but to increase the numbers of DFs and enhance their quality.

Yep, 30 years ago China had already developed DF-5 with a range of 10-12K km, DF-31 is just a continued work to upgrade Chinese long range defense system.
Understand Indian's urge to gain attention,
but sorry guys, you are not even on our radar:coffee:
 
.
DF31
It was estimated that the DF-31 has a payload of about 700kg (other source suggested between 1,050 and 1,750kg), which can be equipped with a single 1,000kT yield nuclear warhead. The missile has a launch weight of 42,000kg, with a length of 13.0m and a body diameter of 2.25m. Carried inside a large canister launcher mounted on the TEL vehicle, the DF-31 uses an inertial guidance system that is equipped with a stellar update system, and is expected to have an accuracy of at least 500m CEP.

AGNI 3
MISSILE -Agni-3, RANGE/ 2500 -3000km/, PAYLOAD-1000kg. CEP-75 m
source Pakistan Think Tank Forum • View topic - Emerging Ballistic missile threat from the Middle East, and

One can easily see which missile is more accurate.I will vote for AGNI 3 as a better missile.:usflag::usflag:
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom