What's new

China's 5G Fighter 'a showoff'

Kindly understand that the US built its first stealth bomber F117 based on a paper submitted by a Soviet Mathematician and most of the US success came from using knowledge from the people of the rest of the world, but as far as Russia is considered they have everything indigenous and as far as China is considered, she has scientist who are fast learners and are enthusiastic in experimenting with the understanding of what they have learned from the Russians and even one day outperform the Russians. I wish China and Russia all the best to outweigh the Americans in every field.
 
I don't know what this has to do with the T-50 or the J-20 but seriously 15 cents a day? LMAO you mean Indian child labor right? We have a thing called minimum salary in China... Your IT jobs in India pay as much as our factory workers so get over it, and China's IT industry employ way more engineers than India.

WS-10 is a clone of which Russian engine by the way?

It is fine if you think our growth is artificial or whatever. Maybe the money in my wallet is fake, too. However, please stick to the topic.

I seriously don't think you have any thing to be proud of, China has 6 trillion economy not because of innovation(U.S.), revelounzing technology(France & U.S.)... BECAUSE CHINA HAD PEOPLE THAT WOULD WORK UNDER 15 cents a day to make toys and nike shoes... China is no innovator, China is grew because the state local gov built and built millions of unoccupied commerical malls and apartments which simply dont have any demand... China grew because it had a pain stakinging tolerant labor force, the dirty jobs... Atleast Indians are respectfull and earned white collar jobs in IT, software design, database admins, programmers...

China's growth is simply artificial...

similarly How can China claim to surpass Russia and even compete against the U.S. f-22 .... when China was dependent on Russian engines for even the jf-17 china exports to Pakistan??? come on, India is no exception... we should stop claming that the tejas is indigenious when we dont have an engine that powers the LCA, Chinese ws-10 is simply cloned from the russian imported engines...
 
I don't know what this has to do with the T-50 or the J-20 but seriously 15 cents a day? LMAO you mean Indian child labor right? We have a thing called minimum salary in China... Your IT jobs in India pay as much as our factory workers so get over it, and China's IT industry employ way more engineers than India.

WS-10 is a clone of which Russian engine by the way?

It is fine if you think our growth is artificial or whatever. Maybe the money in my wallet is fake, too. However, please stick to the topic.

Dude, do what I did, add him to the ignore list.
 
I have been to guangzhou, The place is nice... but let me tell you something, the amount of constrution that is going on in China is really freighting... They have a unwarranted supply, but miniscule demand... China is on path of econmic failure

Whatever rocks your boat :lol:

Also, 'real' professionals don't brag about their professionalism :azn:
 
I have been to guangzhou, The place is nice... but let me tell you something, the amount of constrution that is going on in China is really freighting... They have a unwarranted supply, but miniscule demand... China is on path of econmic failure

And what about our own country, we have the most corrupt and self centered leaders at hand, we have the most scams of modern times. we are receding towards a recession as the Market is falling.
I know that we can make out of all this crap that is pulling our nation down, so is China. Do you think the most intellect as Hu Jintao & and others in power want their country to fail.
In our country, people are working for a better government where as in China, good leaders are making sure that all its population is law abiding. We might say that China has a worst human rights, but is this human rights violation is against drug dealers, murderers and rapist. We need a strong judgment when it comes to crime.
 
Look jf-17 is A JOKE, seriously the thing is mig-21 design, and my colleagues laugh at the aircraft because it has metal plane, with old 70's design and the engine it has been using under Russian supply Klimov RD-33, has been reverse engineerd and cloned and retrofitted under a label ws-10...

000-3d-model-jf-17_f1.jpg

mig21.jpg

How do they look the same?
Wings? Nose? Air intakes? Canopy?
need to get you eyes tested mate.

you clearly are a misinformed and uneducated troll. Plz stop with this brainfarting
 
Kindly understand that the US built its first stealth bomber F117 based on a paper submitted by a Soviet Mathematician and most of the US success came from using knowledge from the people of the rest of the world, but as far as Russia is considered they have everything indigenous and as far as China is considered, she has scientist who are fast learners and are enthusiastic in experimenting with the understanding of what they have learned from the Russians and even one day outperform the Russians. I wish China and Russia all the best to outweigh the Americans in every field.
I do understand and have Ufimtsev's text book in my little library. You are wrong. Ufimtsev's work was not a 'cookbook' of any sort on 'stealth'. It does not say: do X if you want to lower RCS. It simply outline how EM waves behave on surfaces and edges.
 
I do understand and have Ufimtsev's text book in my little library. You are wrong. Ufimtsev's work was not a 'cookbook' of any sort on 'stealth'. It does not say: do X if you want to lower RCS. It simply outline how EM waves behave on surfaces and edges.

Yes americans turned a research article into working mitary tech..
Btw this years noblr prize of military technology should go to colonel qadafi of libya.
He turned viagra into weapon of mass destruction.
 
I do understand and have Ufimtsev's text book in my little library. You are wrong. Ufimtsev's work was not a 'cookbook' of any sort on 'stealth'. It does not say: do X if you want to lower RCS. It simply outline how EM waves behave on surfaces and edges.

The base of the entire concept of designing on edges is from that text book, i hope you agree, what your people made is perfect that paper into reality,.
 
The base of the entire concept of designing on edges is from that text book, i hope you agree, what your people made is perfect that paper into reality,.
You speak as if the Soviets did not looked at Ufimtsev's work. They did and they dismissed it as having no military value. Ufimtsev's work was actually nothing new. The behavior of EM waves on surfaces and edges have been well known. The SR-71 had a lot of 'stealth' feature. What Ufimtsev did was mathematically formalized those behaviors and the Soviets failed to recognize its military potential. The engineers at Lockheed did not.
 
The base of the entire concept of designing on edges is from that text book, i hope you agree, what your people made is perfect that paper into reality,.

From what I know, the Americans got some concepts from Ufimtsev's works.

Its not like the Americans copied the F-117 from the Soviets or something :lol: Much of the work behind the F-117 and basically today's definition of 'stealth' are mostly the work of Americans. The product and the brains behind it are 100% original and American. Oh, did I mention the SR-71 Blackbird?

Why do you think the Russians were scrambling the wreckage of the F-117 shot down over Serbia way back in the late 90's? :azn: And now the PAK FA :D Add J-20 to that :P
 
From what I know, the Americans got some concepts from Ufimtsev's works.

Its not like the Americans copied the F-117 from the Soviets or something :lol: Much of the work behind the F-117 and basically today's definition of 'stealth' are mostly the work of Americans. The product and the brains behind it are 100% original and American. Oh, did I mention the SR-71 Blackbird?

Why do you think the Russians were scrambling the wreckage of the F-117 shot down over Serbia way back in the late 90's? :azn: And now the PAK FA :D Add J-20 to that :P

Bapreay!! you have to understand that the F117 is a ultimate stealth plane no doubt on it, but that is not the derivative for the PAK FA or the J20. these two planes are designed for minimal radar cross section and not to evade radar by deflecting the radar waves as the F117 does. and also when it comes to dog fight F117 is a sitting duck, PAK FA and J20 are designed for high speed and maneuverability just like the F22 raptor.
 
Please don't tell me, THIS IS MY PROFESSION...

Alot of our engineers are convinced the j-20 is simply incapable of providing steallth
let me guess, the same engineers(including you) that have come up with high tech stuff like LCA? :lol:

build a successful air plane first and then you can talk.... you guys dream of building a 5th gen... BUT it will never leave the paper state...:disagree:
 
I have been to guangzhou, The place is nice... but let me tell you something, the amount of constrution that is going on in China is really freighting... They have a unwarranted supply, but miniscule demand... China is on path of econmic failure

ok``` that explains why you are trolling on very possible opportunity to bash China, because you've been to China and the prosperity presented there is way out of your tiny 'professional' brain from 'long island'```and your funny ego was severely hurt, so now you chose to live in denial to ease your agony
 
let me guess, the same engineers(including you) that have come up with high tech stuff like LCA? :lol:

build a successful air plane first and then you can talk.... you guys dream of building a 5th gen... BUT it will never leave the paper state...:disagree:

better not to bring LCA here, 'Bengal.Tiger98' is just a 8-year-old kid pretends to be an engineer`lol
 
Back
Top Bottom