What's new

China to attack Vietnam's benefits

lawxx

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
524
Reaction score
0
The level of combat troops, can not rely on exercise. In addition to the world, China still has not any international war of the great powers? In recent years, it said, a little on the international reputation of Russia, the United States, Britain and France have been real. In the Iraq war have been the test of actual combat. Lessons of Vietnam, the advantages are:

1 People's Liberation Army to show their combat power, enhance national cohesion.

Vietnam's comprehensive national strength is not high, because the PLA did not fight three decades, therefore choose the military in Vietnam will be a training opportunity. PLA can test a variety of tactics and weaponry, amphibious landing exercise tactics. Recovered by the Vietnamese occupation once and for all the 29 islands, warning to others, warned that some neighboring countries.


(2) act as a "kill a chicken monkey" role.
Vietnam and Malaysia and other ASEAN members piracy, illegal seizure of Chinese island, the illegal exploitation of oil. China to be the basis for their lessons. Pirates in these countries, Vietnam war the strongest, most rush to take a Chinese island. Vietnam will be able to destroy the first Pirates of the other countries act as a deterrent.

3 European countries to meet the combat capability of China's curiosity.


4 international deter India Asan such a "deliberate aggression" country.
India's southern Tibet issue has been lining up.



Vietnam rogue states, ungrateful, himself. Frequent challenge China's bottom line, so I chose Vietnam is the best choice!
 
.
Interesting that you bring this up. India will soon too need to flex her muscles to demonstrate to the world that we have now "arrived" on the global scene. Pakistan is too powerful to easily crush, but Sri Lanka would be a good option for the Indian military to make an example of.

To Sri Lankan members, please do not take it the wrong way. The bigger picture must be realized as India is now a global power and the next Superpower. We must send a strong message to China and Pakistan and the only way to do it is to make an example out of Sri Lanka. Because this war will be a very symbolic one it will carry the full wrath of the Indian military -- only then will hostile neighbors know how powerful we are.
 
.
Quit posting craps about Vietnam that has little to do with Chinese military. Sweep all your new garbage into current threads.
 
.
The level of combat troops, can not rely on exercise. In addition to the world, China still has not any international war of the great powers? In recent years, it said, a little on the international reputation of Russia, the United States, Britain and France have been real. In the Iraq war have been the test of actual combat. Lessons of Vietnam, the advantages are:

1 People's Liberation Army to show their combat power, enhance national cohesion.

Vietnam's comprehensive national strength is not high, because the PLA did not fight three decades, therefore choose the military in Vietnam will be a training opportunity. PLA can test a variety of tactics and weaponry, amphibious landing exercise tactics. Recovered by the Vietnamese occupation once and for all the 29 islands, warning to others, warned that some neighboring countries.


(2) act as a "kill a chicken monkey" role.
Vietnam and Malaysia and other ASEAN members piracy, illegal seizure of Chinese island, the illegal exploitation of oil. China to be the basis for their lessons. Pirates in these countries, Vietnam war the strongest, most rush to take a Chinese island. Vietnam will be able to destroy the first Pirates of the other countries act as a deterrent.

3 European countries to meet the combat capability of China's curiosity.


4 international deter India Asan such a "deliberate aggression" country.
India's southern Tibet issue has been lining up.



Vietnam rogue states, ungrateful, himself. Frequent challenge China's bottom line, so I chose Vietnam is the best choice!

It's something wrong with you ? You have mange of threads on to make threatening to Vietnam. The dog is barking doesn't bite. But Chinese guy nicknamed "lawxx" is dangerous.
 
.
India army in Japan notoriously bad.Arjun tanks, LCA, 30 years made it. " The black cat" is not on the M88In the Mumbai attacks, police still use the rifles of World War ii.GDP of average per capita is too low
 
.
The level of combat troops, can not rely on exercise. In addition to the world, China still has not any international war of the great powers? In recent years, it said, a little on the international reputation of Russia, the United States, Britain and France have been real. In the Iraq war have been the test of actual combat. Lessons of Vietnam, the advantages are:

1 People's Liberation Army to show their combat power, enhance national cohesion.

Vietnam's comprehensive national strength is not high, because the PLA did not fight three decades, therefore choose the military in Vietnam will be a training opportunity. PLA can test a variety of tactics and weaponry, amphibious landing exercise tactics. Recovered by the Vietnamese occupation once and for all the 29 islands, warning to others, warned that some neighboring countries.


(2) act as a "kill a chicken monkey" role.
Vietnam and Malaysia and other ASEAN members piracy, illegal seizure of Chinese island, the illegal exploitation of oil. China to be the basis for their lessons. Pirates in these countries, Vietnam war the strongest, most rush to take a Chinese island. Vietnam will be able to destroy the first Pirates of the other countries act as a deterrent.

3 European countries to meet the combat capability of China's curiosity.


4 international deter India Asan such a "deliberate aggression" country.
India's southern Tibet issue has been lining up.



Vietnam rogue states, ungrateful, himself. Frequent challenge China's bottom line, so I chose Vietnam is the best choice!

Poor Chinese, they are still influenced a lot by Chinese communist propaganda :rofl:
They still believe that Paracel and Spartly islands belong to them, their evidence is Chinese communist say that so it's the truth :rofl: They still can't prove their legal sovereignty here :rofl:
They also think that they can easily invade Vietnam whenever they want :rofl: Look like Chinese really want to repeat their history ... err ... their destiny in the history again and again :rofl:
 
.
Interesting that you bring this up. India will soon too need to flex her muscles to demonstrate to the world that we have now "arrived" on the global scene. Pakistan is too powerful to easily crush, but Sri Lanka would be a good option for the Indian military to make an example of.

To Sri Lankan members, please do not take it the wrong way. The bigger picture must be realized as India is now a global power and the next Superpower. We must send a strong message to China and Pakistan and the only way to do it is to make an example out of Sri Lanka. Because this war will be a very symbolic one it will carry the full wrath of the Indian military -- only then will hostile neighbors know how powerful we are.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
. .
Memory is so bad? Whether needs to arrive at the hospital to accept the treatment?Before introduced you read article?you determined that you have earnest reading?

<<The Spratly Islands dispute: who's on first?>> by Daniel J. Dzurek, Clive H. Schofield

I have read it. So?
From that article, all I can see in Chinese argument is:
- Fishing movement. Chinese fishermen had reached there in Han/Tang/Yuan dynasties (Yuan :rofl:, we all love the Yuan :rofl:) so it belongs to China :rofl: Such an stupid argument, "set sovereignty" and "discover something" (or "catch some fish") are totally different. Spain can claim the whole America because they found it first? No, they have to send forces later to set sovereignty like other nations (England, France, Dutch ...).
And, if force came there but didn't set sovereignty, it's illegal to claim too. Such as Vietnamese forces of General Lý Long T&#432;&#7901;ng had been to Taiwan, but he didn't set sovereignty there so Vietnam can't claim Taiwan.
- North Vietnam "sold" Paracel and Spartly to China so Socialist Republic of Vietnam don't have the right over those islands.
-> They forget that the Viet Cong and the South Vietnam have the right over Paracel and Spartly, not North Vietnam. North Vietnam can't "sell" somethings not belong to them :rofl: Today Vietnam has the sovereignty from Viet Cong, not from North Vietnam. Poor for China, both Viet Cong and South Vietnam opposed China's claim and invasion :rofl:
All I can say is "Cheater was cheated" :rofl: You can accuse North Vietnam for "treaky" or something like that, but real cheater like China have to be cheated sometimes, right :rofl:
- The author accuse Vietnam for "treat both archipelagos as only one archipelago in the history", but they can't explain why Viet Nam can't do that :rofl:
 
.
&#272;&#7843;o B&#7841;ch Long V&#7929;;2065633 said:
I have read it. So?
From that article, all I can see in Chinese argument is:
- Fishing movement. Chinese fishermen had reached there in Han/Tang/Yuan dynasties (Yuan :rofl:, we all love the Yuan :rofl:) so it belongs to China :rofl: Such an stupid argument, "set sovereignty" and "discover something" (or "catch some fish") are totally different. Spain can claim the whole America because they found it first? No, they have to send forces later to set sovereignty like other nations (England, France, Dutch ...).
And, if force came there but didn't set sovereignty, it's illegal to claim too. Such as Vietnamese forces of General Lý Long T&#432;&#7901;ng had been to Taiwan, but he didn't set sovereignty there so Vietnam can't claim Taiwan.
- North Vietnam "sold" Paracel and Spartly to China so Socialist Republic of Vietnam don't have the right over those islands.
-> They forget that the Viet Cong and the South Vietnam have the right over Paracel and Spartly, not North Vietnam. North Vietnam can't "sell" somethings not belong to them :rofl: Today Vietnam has the sovereignty from Viet Cong, not from North Vietnam. Poor for China, both Viet Cong and South Vietnam opposed China's claim and invasion :rofl:
All I can say is "Cheater was cheated" :rofl: You can accuse North Vietnam for "treaky" or something like that, but real cheater like China have to be cheated sometimes, right :rofl:
- The author accuse Vietnam for "treat both archipelagos as only one archipelago in the history", but they can't explain why Viet Nam can't do that :rofl:

You talk once again proved my point of view is correct, Vietnam excels to sophistry! Your so-called Nansha Islands and Xisha Islands sovereignty, Can only come through the confusion concept, to Manufacture the false evidence to prove&#65292;Method is different, trick was the same&#65281;Since Vietnam may say the such shameless words, Then we have the necessity which continues to talk? Therefore, do not pretend that Viet Nam is innocent, Insult China's unreasonable,bullies the small and weak country,Regarding Vietnamese this kind of shameless country, China makes anything not to be excessive! This is Vietnam should obtain! Finally, with retarded NiceGuy,Returns to the Vietnamese forum, This is not the mentally handicapped and shameless people Discussion place!
 
.
There are some point I've just figured out:

1. Your post is the ugliest English writing I've ever seen.

2. China has to many things to deal with, not only Vietnam: Xinjiang, Tibet, Taiwan (internal), Russia, S.Korea, Japan, the U.S, Vietnam, the Philippines, India(external)... That reality would prevent you from concentrating your main battle forces.

3. You suppose that all of your neighbors are sort of "good guys" who would let do whatever and have no response at all.

4. You must be a very young boy of the 1-child generation who have never suffered from war to say that a war with Vietnam would be a good training exercise. You will never say it again if the war broke out and you would be a soldier that fight on the battlefield and get bloodshed.

And finally, once and for all: A BARKING DOG WILL NEVER BITE.

P/S: Chinese who I know were of smart, friendly, reasonable, rational, hospitable people.
Many members with Chinese flag on this forum are actually making anti-China acts in the name of Chinese people or pro-China.
 
.
I agree with Vietnamese members. This poster is obsessed with war and live in the fantasy of Sino-Vietnam war. You are free to post, but it&#8217;s a shame to provoke others based on your ignorance and arrogance, and hence enjoying people fighting each other.

His view is certainly not the view of majority Chinese and should be ignored. Although we had some conflicts with Vietnam in the past, we know Vietnam has one of the closest tie and culture interaction with China in South East Asia. Let&#8217;s hope China and Vietnam can resolve their difference in peace and be prosperous together because war is not good for either of us except its joy for some crazy people.
 
.
The level of combat troops, can not rely on exercise. In addition to the world, China still has not any international war of the great powers? In recent years, it said, a little on the international reputation of Russia, the United States, Britain and France have been real. In the Iraq war have been the test of actual combat. Lessons of Vietnam, the advantages are:

1 People's Liberation Army to show their combat power, enhance national cohesion.

Vietnam's comprehensive national strength is not high, because the PLA did not fight three decades, therefore choose the military in Vietnam will be a training opportunity. PLA can test a variety of tactics and weaponry, amphibious landing exercise tactics. Recovered by the Vietnamese occupation once and for all the 29 islands, warning to others, warned that some neighboring countries.


(2) act as a "kill a chicken monkey" role.
Vietnam and Malaysia and other ASEAN members piracy, illegal seizure of Chinese island, the illegal exploitation of oil. China to be the basis for their lessons. Pirates in these countries, Vietnam war the strongest, most rush to take a Chinese island. Vietnam will be able to destroy the first Pirates of the other countries act as a deterrent.

3 European countries to meet the combat capability of China's curiosity.


4 international deter India Asan such a "deliberate aggression" country.
India's southern Tibet issue has been lining up.



Vietnam rogue states, ungrateful, himself. Frequent challenge China's bottom line, so I chose Vietnam is the best choice!


I thought it was some better news. /close thread
 
.
You talk once again proved my point of view is correct, Vietnam excels to sophistry! Your so-called Nansha Islands and Xisha Islands sovereignty, Can only come through the confusion concept, to Manufacture the false evidence to prove&#65292;Method is different, trick was the same&#65281;Since Vietnam may say the such shameless words, Then we have the necessity which continues to talk? Therefore, do not pretend that Viet Nam is innocent, Insult China's unreasonable,bullies the small and weak country,Regarding Vietnamese this kind of shameless country, China makes anything not to be excessive! This is Vietnam should obtain! Finally, with retarded NiceGuy,Returns to the Vietnamese forum, This is not the mentally handicapped and shameless people Discussion place!

OK, after all insulting words, now tell me, what's your point at all :rofl: :rofl:
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom