What's new

China picked up more than 60 casualties during Galwan clash says head of Northern command

. . . .
Well, much better than unverified twitter.
Maybe you should google who is Taylor Fravel
Well, much better than unverified twitter.
Why can Indians admit the truth? Indians got HUMILIATED and EMBARRASSED that 20+ Indian soldiers died and 10+ Indian soldiers got captured, it needs to make up PLA death number to feel less humiliated. Just tell the truth from your heart.
 
. . . .
.
They have been lying since day 1 from top to bottom, do they looked "unarmed, unperpared"? The truth was exactly the opposite.
The huge number troops present and sticks they were carrying only affirms high Chinese casualties. Lot more than only 4.
 
.
The huge number troops present and sticks they were carrying only affirms high Chinese casualties. Lot more than only 4.
Actually the high number of Indian troops confirms low Chinese casualties since the number of Indians they had before only inflicted 4 casualties and cost them 20 soldiers and a platoon captured
See here
1615530917459.jpeg

the Indians decided to try to swarm the Chinese as seen in that video but it only caused more Indians to surrender
 
.
you want to know how someone gets captured in an ambush and that too when they were unarmed?
Conducting ambushes is already taught in military institutions. Counter-ambush techniques are also taught - armed & unarmed, on foot or on vehicle.

Were Indian soldiers trained in counter-ambush techniques ? Go ask Commandants of Indian Military training academies coz its evident that Indian soldiers were not trained well.
 
.
The huge number troops present and sticks they were carrying only affirms high Chinese casualties. Lot more than only 4.

Well, the most of IA soldiers were just standing cross the river and watching that "chinki" dude doing his cocky moves. They figured they need to keep themselves alive to get their next paycheck, so they were just getting ready to run in case things turn sour.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom