China paper condemns Vietnam-India energy cooperation

[boris]

if it was not the Americans during the ww2 half or even more part of china would have been speaking Japanese and your names/surnames would have been like matsugane yoko (yum), yamamoto, honda, koizumi etc etc instead of ming, bing, ching, ho, ma, gang bang, blah blah blah!

lol at gang,bang.i love the japanese they are on given day better than the chinese

 

[Hunan123]

if it was not the Americans during the ww2 half or even more part of china would have been speaking Japanese and your names/surnames would have been like matsugane yoko (yum), yamamoto, honda, koizumi etc etc instead of ming, bing, ching, ho, ma, gang bang, blah blah blah!

Oh, are your mature? Japan invaded China started in 1937 BUT USA fought with JP was on 1941. In the WW 2 China was the biggest force to against the fascist JP aggression. We feel the fascists were world's enemy no one could sympathize them except your Indians junks.

 

[below_freezing]

if it was not the Americans during the ww2 half or even more part of china would have been speaking Japanese and your names/surnames would have been like matsugane yoko (yum), yamamoto, honda, koizumi etc etc instead of ming, bing, ching, ho, ma, gang bang, blah blah blah!

China fought Japan for 8 years, never lost more than 40% of territory, and killed 1 million Japanese. Japan could not extract 1 cent of profit from China due to the resistance from the public.

India fought Britain for 3 years in 1857, killed almost 0, and then was completely dominated and conquered by the British whites. Then India was made to serve Britain's industrial revolution as a market for their textiles while British stamped out Indian industries.

 

[perplexed]

China fought Japan for 8 years, never lost more than 40% of territory, and killed 1 million Japanese. Japan could not extract 1 cent of profit from China due to the resistance from the public.

India fought Britain for 3 years in 1857, killed almost 0, and then was completely dominated and conquered by the British whites. Then India was made to serve Britain's industrial revolution as a market for their textiles while British stamped out Indian industries.

So now u will judge movements of Independence based on the number of people who got killed in the process.... No wonder so many innocent people got killed in Tiananmen massacre.

 

[Secur]

Any new developments ?

 

[Avatar]

When India's economy can afford it, India should provide Vietnam with all kinds of assistance that it needs to secure itself in the region. A friend in need is a friend indeed.

 

[Avatar]

China fought Japan for 8 years, never lost more than 40% of territory, and killed 1 million Japanese. Japan could not extract 1 cent of profit from China due to the resistance from the public.

India fought Britain for 3 years in 1857, killed almost 0, and then was completely dominated and conquered by the British whites. Then India was made to serve Britain's industrial revolution as a market for their textiles while British stamped out Indian industries.

India was a relatively peaceful country in 1857 which never anticipated what was about to come. Cannons, bows, swords were no match for guns and Britain's guns and deception. I suggest you come back to 2011 my dear friend, and stop living in the 1850's or even the 1960's.

However I am happy that you recognize that India existed in 1857 unlike your Pakistani friends. Well done.

 

[jdme]

China fought Japan for 8 years, never lost more than 40% of territory, and killed 1 million Japanese. Japan could not extract 1 cent of profit from China due to the resistance from the public.

India fought Britain for 3 years in 1857, killed almost 0, and then was completely dominated and conquered by the British whites. Then India was made to serve Britain's industrial revolution as a market for their textiles while British stamped out Indian industries.

INDIA never fought anyone before 1947. Are you one those cheap exploited Chinese worker we constantly complain about in US? IS that why you are so ignorant?

 

[Hunan123]

When India's economy can afford it, India should provide Vietnam with all kinds of assistance that it needs to secure itself in the region. A friend in need is a friend indeed.

Surely, India can arm VN but China also can support PK,Bangladesh,Nepal and Maoist in north India.etc....How about feeling for Indians when that time?

 

[I spikes therefore I am]

Surely, India can arm VN but China also can support PK,Bangladesh,Nepal and Maoist in north India.etc....How about feeling for Indians when that time?

Our neighbors are too weak most of them are depend on us ,so managing them is not at all a problem . But In the case of china , most of them are powerful and having gud economic growth and it is difficult to contain them.

 

[Dash]

Surely, India can arm VN but China also can support PK,Bangladesh,Nepal and Maoist in north India.etc....How about feeling for Indians when that time?

We are not in war with ny of these countries except PK. So the you will get negligible benifit in supporting them. and we also have equal hold in these countries like you have or even more so any kind of activity will not go unnoticed by our intelligence.

 

[Avatar]

Surely, India can arm VN but China also can support PK,Bangladesh,Nepal and Maoist in north India.etc....How about feeling for Indians when that time?

Haven't you been doing exactly this since time immemorial ?

India is a big country surrounded by many smaller countries. The biggest of these is Pakistan, and it's the only nation whom China can rely on as an ally against India. The other nations know what's good for them. They will sing your praises and get your benefits, but they know they are geographically restricted and a stable friendly India is in their interests.

While Pakistan is the only country in the subcontinent that can challenge India, the gap between the two is increasing steadily and in about 10 years if both countries manage to maintain the current growth (and if Pakistan manages to solve its problems) the gap will be a multiple of what it is now.

 

[Kazhugu]

China fought Japan for 8 years, never lost more than 40% of territory, and killed 1 million Japanese. Japan could not extract 1 cent of profit from China due to the resistance from the public.

and got 25 million of them killed.

India fought Britain for 3 years in 1857, killed almost 0, and then was completely dominated and conquered by the British whites. Then India was made to serve Britain's industrial revolution as a market for their textiles while British stamped out Indian industries.

blame that on the people inhabiting present day pakistan (pathans,balochs,punjabis) who backstabbed the revolters (bengalis,biharis,central indians) who were from present day india, joined hands with british and helped crush the revolt......

 

[Obambam]

if it was not the Americans during the ww2 half or even more part of china would have been speaking Japanese and your names/surnames would have been like matsugane yoko (yum), yamamoto, honda, koizumi etc etc instead of ming, bing, ching, ho, ma, gang bang, blah blah blah!

Perhaps India would end up speaking Japanese too instead of English?
That was all nothing but in the history now. More importantly it is the Japanese who took on board the "ming, bing, ching, ho, ma, gang bang" you talked about and incooporated into its own language. Look, who is the winner here?

---------- Post added at 02:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:47 AM ----------

Oh, are your mature? Japan invaded China started in 1937 BUT USA fought with JP was on 1941. In the WW 2 China was the biggest force to against the fascist JP aggression. We feel the fascists were world's enemy no one could sympathize them except your Indians junks.

I am surprised they don't go all out pro German Nazis.

 

[below_freezing]

and got 25 million of them killed.



blame that on the people inhabiting present day pakistan (pathans,balochs,punjabis) who backstabbed the revolters (bengalis,biharis,central indians) who were from present day india, joined hands with british and helped crush the revolt......

yes, but it is better to die in battle and maintain your freedom, than to accept slavery. more than 25 million Indians died because of white British so overall it was worth it to fight against Japan.

if they truly did backstab India, then that is shameful, because they in turn were also enslaved. But there is also a Punjab in India, are you saying that Indian Punjabis were extremely honorable and fought British, while those on the western half are dirty traitors? And could it be that people, especially in India, migrate frequently and that it could be the honorable ones living on the western half today, and the traitors are living on the eastern half?

---------- Post added at 06:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:30 AM ----------

INDIA never fought anyone before 1947. Are you one those cheap exploited Chinese worker we constantly complain about in US? IS that why you are so ignorant?

so there was no Sepoy Rebellion, supported by the Mughal remnants, against white British.

I wouldn't dare deny my own history, especially an honorable history. Seems like you've been munching too many burgers.