China, Pakistan to deploy warships to safeguard Balochistan port

[royalharris]

Why not? The only purpose of building a carrier is to station it in home? Should be deployed to protect our ally and interests overseas?

1、 PLAN priority is fixed the problem of taiwan, The liberation of Ryukyu, break through 1st and 2nd island chain,the main competation will between USN
2、For gawadar, totally no need for CBG, fleet with 055 is for more enough
3、The precondition is Pakistan need and welcom your protection

 

[帅的一匹]

1、 PLAN priority is fixed the problem of taiwan, The liberation of Ryukyu, break through 1st and 2nd island chain,the main competation will between USN
2、For gawadar, totally no need for CBG, fleet with 055 is for more enough
3、The precondition is Pakistan need and welcom your protection

Yeh Taiwan is the priority, but I still insist we shall deploy carrier per the sea Silk Road. If Pakistan allows, we shall deploy CBG at Gwadar frequently to ensure the stability of IOR. if the CBG can't be deployed globally, we don't need a carrier at all.

 

[nomi007]

need to develop 3-4 cant areas in Baluchistan this will finish terrorist camps

 

[royalharris]

Yeh Taiwan is the priority, but I still insist we shall deploy carrier per the sea Silk Road. If Pakistan allows, we shall deploy CBG at Gwadar frequently to ensure the stability of IOR. if the CBG can't be deployed globally, we don't need a carrier at all.

Even if we deploy CBG in oversea bases, the priority should be Malacca, then Djibouti. Again，055 is far more enough to protect the pakistan water.
Again,the precondition is Pakistan need and welcom your protection

The deployment of oversea bases is a large cost, you can ask germany\japan\SK, how many cost they have shared with usa every year?

 

[帅的一匹]

Even if we deploy CBG in oversea bases, the priority should be Malacca, then Djibouti. Again，055 is far more enough to protect the pakistan water.
Again,the precondition is Pakistan need and welcom your protection

PN will get 8 S20 subs in the next few years, CBG deployment is more like a deterrence. Deployment in Malacca is a choice, but our relationship with Malaysia is not as iron as with Pakistan.

 

[royalharris]

1、Deployment in malacca is not just about relationship, its is about national strategy and interest. you really should learn more about geopolitics
2、again，055 is far more enough and deterrence,the precondition is Pakistan need and welcom your protection

 

[LeGenD]

I am more interested in the message it sends to the US, back in 2001 it bullied Pakistan into doing it's bidding but now if US wants anything from Pakistan, mere threats wont cut it. US influence on Pakistan and it's foreign policy is going to hit rock bottom soon and with Russia edging towards Pakistan, Pakistan may enjoy a stronger International diplomatic support.

It is not wise to expand the scope of conflict in the region. We already have our hands full with India. An Indo-US nexus would be a nightmare scenario for the region. Chinese presence will only fuel the conflict, not discourage it.

We should let our emotions cloud our judgement. Relationship between two states, is primarily grounded in interests. We have a golden opportunity to fix our ties with the US and encourage it to invest in Pakistan. This is the message we need to send to the US, rather than hostility.

By the way, we are being way too optimistic about the Russia tilt towards us. At maximum, Pak-Russia relations might normalize but do not expect Russia to ditch India for Pakistan.

 

[Djinn]

It is not wise to expand the scope of conflict in the region. Let us keep it to India.

By the way, we are being way too optimistic about the Russia tilt towards us.

A little foresight goes a long way and lessons from past always serve to mold the future, hence can't be ignored.
Perhaps the Russian friendship thing is a bit exaggerated but who said Rome was built in a day?

 

[LeGenD]

A little foresight goes a long way and lessons from past always serve to mold the future, hence can't be ignored.
Perhaps the Russian friendship thing is a bit exaggerated but who said Rome was built in a day?

Lesson is that we should increase the number of our enemies in the region? Geopolitical matters are complicated, not a fairy-tale.

 

[Djinn]

Lesson is that we should increase the number of our enemies? Geopolitical matters are complicated, not a fairy-tale.

Lesson is we should never forget who did us wrong. Geopolitics are no idealist tea party either.

 

[LeGenD]

Lesson is we should never forget who did us wrong. Geopolitics are no idealist tea party either.

I am sorry but this is emotional assessment.

It is in our interest to tackle the menace of terrorism and stay away from Cold Wars of others. It is not in our interest to seek confrontation with the WEST because we were threatened once. CPEC is intended for economic prosperity, confrontational attitude will discourage other states from embracing it.

 

[Djinn]

I am sorry but this is emotional assessment.

It is in our interest to tackle the menace of terrorism and stay away from Cold Wars of others. It is not in our interest to seek confrontation with the WEST.

I am sorry to disagree but terrorism isn't the only thing we have to worry about. If only things were that simple but they are not. If West is going to create hurdles for us then we cannot sideline them just because its "The West" we have to prioritize our interests for the better tomorrow and if it hurts Western sentiments so be it.

 

[DJ_Viper]

I am sorry to disagree but terrorism isn't the only thing we have to worry about. If only things were that simple but they are not. If West is going to create hurdles for us then we cannot sideline them just because its "The West" we have to prioritize our interests for the better tomorrow and if it hurts Western sentiments so be it.

Sir, the West already wants to join the CPEC. There is plenty of evidence on this forum available to read. What anyone would or should do, is to ensure the project in terms of an economic gateway is open to all (because that brings previous revenue to Pakistan). But at the same time, keep your guard up. You'll need to double up your navy and essentially lock-down this area with regards to patrolling and monitoring of sea lanes. That way, you'd have strengthened your own defenses, as well as ensured safety along the route, which, other would obviously appreciate. Works for all

 

[Djinn]

Sir, the West already wants to join the CPEC. There is plenty of evidence on this forum available to read. What anyone would or should do, is to ensure the project in terms of an economic gateway is open to all (because that brings previous revenue to Pakistan). But at the same time, keep your guard up. You'll need to double up your navy and essentially lock-down this area with regards to patrolling and monitoring of sea lanes. That way, you'd have strengthened your own defenses, as well as ensured safety along the route, which, other would obviously appreciate. Works for all

Sure if they want to be part of it they are most welcome, but i was referring to such intervention, which escapes the short term memory of our "Let's not antagonize US" proponents.
US warns Pakistan over Iran deal
http://www.thedailystar.net/news-detail-143488

 

[t_for_talli]

Finally, I have waited many years for this particular development.

Remember you allowed drones on your land and now