China must recover territory ‘looted' by neighbours, said PLA General

[6642.CN]

Forgetting Bhutan here.

Bhutanese enclaves in Tibet, namely Cherkip Gompa, Dho, Dungmar, Gesur, Gezon, Itse Gompa, Khochar, Nyanri, Ringung, Sanmar, Tarchen and Zuthulphuk.

minor issues. negligible. the threat is India.

 

[gambit]

Yeah, I think for the sake of humanity, China should make an exception , by sacrificing herself on this "not meddle in other countries' internal affairs", for once.

Think no further than 100s of millions of Indian souls that go to bed with empty stomachs everyday. Some are so hungry that they start hallucinating by bullshitting "India designs FGFA, etc. " whenever they sneak into PDF on borrowed time.

No...A support for Maoist insurgency in India would not benefit India, let alone humanity, but would benefit China. There is nothing humane about Mao-ism.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

If it was that simple your army would have done it in 1962 itself.

Its one of most highly militarized areas in the world.
If i also recall there are about 20 divisions stationed in the NE.

1962 was a short war that was won quickly.

In a longer conflict, the "Chickens neck" corridor will be a huge vulnerability for India, especially considering the large numbers of active insurgencies in North East India.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

minor issues. negligible.

Try taking them ,we"ll see how minor they are

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

And this is because Bharat has had wars with all her neighbour.
I mean look at the history, there is no empire, no country like bharat, It is the only entity in the history of mankind which fight with all her neighbour.
Pakistan 47,65,71,84,99
China 62
Sikkim75
Maldives 1989
Sri Lanka 83-2009
Bangladesh Several skirmishes
Nepal(bharat tried but defeated by Maoists)

Bottomline is bharat cannot live peacefully with anyone

Now i am definitely convinced,your historical as well general knowledge is a product of rupeenews articles.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

I would after liberating occupied kashmir.

Thanks buddy.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

India is already collapsing under the weight of numerous insurgencies.

In that case India should have collapsed A LOOONNNNG TIME AGO...

You would think India should have collapsed in the 1980s, but guess what? India is still here, and getting stronger and better day by the day.

Human Development Report 1981

Human Development Report 1991

Human Development Report 2001

Human Development Report 2005

You would think India would end up like Yugoslavia, but India is still here! With a cultural diversity matching Africa. India is a miracle!

 

[6642.CN]

No...A support for Maoist insurgency in India would not benefit India, let alone humanity, but would benefit China. There is nothing humane about Mao-ism.

can you join the Indian military to fight China? please answer, Yes.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

In a longer conflict, the "Chickens neck" corridor will be a huge vulnerability for India,

Yes! in a longer conflict .
But all modern conflict are limited to a month or maybe 2.
Unless you are combating an insurgency.

especially considering the large numbers of active insurgencies in North East India.

The active insurgencies don't have population support and many of them are fighting amongst eachother .

The strongest one is ULFA over there and as per recent news,all i see is voluntary surrender and recently a main leader was also captured.

 

[below_freezing]

This is where you boys' study and understanding of history, vis-a-vis inter-states relations, is lacking. The US-UK-Euro analogy I presented is applicable only up to a point. Great Britain and the European countries can only resort of colonialism to assert themselves on the global stage. The young US continued to expand and grow on its own continent and over time grew a geopolitical prominence that eclipsed Great Britain and Europe.

Viet Nam can never be like post-Revolutionary US with plenty of room and resources to exploit, grow and possibly eclipsed larger countries. Viet Nam, if wishing to assert some measure of independence on the world stage in general and in Asia in particular, must take after post WW II Japan, where the people and the country's leadership abandoned imperialism and concentrate on economic prowess. Japan has nowhere the natural resources as the three 'Indochina' countries and Japan eclipsed China in many ways, from economic prowess to geopolitical stature, in Asia in particular and the world in general. The UK is a member of UN Security Council, a group whose membership is based largely upon nuclear arms. Japan, alongside South Korea, would be members of an economic 'security council' on a global scale, if there is such an official organ, and past economic rescues done by either countries reinforce that perception. Unable to emulate the young US after a bloody severance from Great Britain, Viet Nam will not look to China but to the West for a geopolitical severance from a condescending and contemptuous China.

Geopolitical stature: don't recall Japan being a security council member.
Economics: Japan's GDP is lower than ours now
Vietnam: No aid from Japan, US, whatever, they have to work for it the way we did, and the biggest source of investment and imports for Vietnam? China.

 

[6642.CN]

Try taking them ,we"ll see how minor they are

we will make more enclaves and give them too if they ask because the threat is India. now got it?

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

can you join the Indian military to fight China? please answer, Yes.

USA will,if we ask them to.

Remember American Air strikes were only a week away before 1962 ended.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

we will make more enclaves and give them too if they ask because the threat is India. now got it?

Bhutan was the only nation to side with India during 1962.

The Tibetan refugees have had a strong impact on the Bhutanese and also Sikkim.

No wonder China couldn't get Sikkim.
Got it?

 

[6642.CN]

USA will,if we ask them to.

Remember American Air strikes were only a week away before 1962 ended.

remember 1971? Nixon and Kissinger both urged China to send troops deep into India with assurances that Marines and USAF would provide all types of support.

that is why I said China missed 1971 opportunity.

 

[PureAryan]

Very good...So here is how it could happen...Pakistan convinced China to consider India an 'enemy' of sorts. Pakistan and China ejected India out of Kashmir. China then convinced Pakistan to fight Taiwan, US, and possibly Japan and South Korea to conquer Taiwan. Baghdad Bob, is that you?

Leaving your childish little insult aside, Pakistan and china has been friend for almost 3000 years, Our realationship dates back to Qin dynasty, We traded using silk road, Chinese were frequent visitors to Taxilla, Pakistan and China together saved buddhism after it was exterminated from its place of birth in Bharat.
In simple words pakistan and china has been enemies of Ganga Valley for thousands of years, It is natural for pakistan to help china than america when it is needed.
Taiwan is an integral part of china, i have many taiwanese friends who proudly call themselves chinese unlike kashmiris who consider it an insult to be called indian.