What's new

China Must Realise India of 2014 is Not the India of 1962

In 5 years time, the PRC wont be able to threaten India like it can now. Infrastructure is being built, divisions raised, and equipment procured. Not to mention the AGNI V is set to enter series production soon.

Everything is moving ahead in the right direction For India.
 
.
I generally agree with what you just said, except for the highlighted part. I have never seen Chinese media with screaming headlines as opposed to the Indian counterpart. The pattern is invariably as follows----Indian media breaks the news ----Chinese foreign ministry spokeman responds with a low key stetement when asked about it at a regularly held press briefing. Nothing more than that.

Nehru was an arrogant son of gun but he was not stupid. He had plenty of good reasons to believe that his forward policy would work. China had a famine. China had only two unpaved roads connecting Tibet with rest of the country and passage was only seasonal. US was hostile and Sino-Soviet split was becoming more and more obvious. His only miscalculation was that he underestimated Mao Zedong, a battle-hardened revolutionary who had fought the Japanese, the civil war, and the Americans in Korea. Mao was never going to take it lying down.
I also notice the abnormal thing that Chinese media and foreign ministry spokeswomen only to be bombastic on topics of maritime issues and keep low key in India-China border issue.But that doesn't mean we Chinese never notice the issue for you know 90,000 sq km Chinese territory now is under India control.
 
.
In 5 years time, the PRC wont be able to threaten India like it can now. Infrastructure is being built, divisions raised, and equipment procured. Not to mention the AGNI V is set to enter series production soon.

Everything is moving ahead in the right direction For India.

In five years, it will be 2020, which is the year when India becomes a superpower due to Modi-ji's brilliant leadership. Of course China won't be able to threaten India!
 
.
In 5 years time, the PRC wont be able to threaten India like it can now. Infrastructure is being built, divisions raised, and equipment procured. Not to mention the AGNI V is set to enter series production soon.

Everything is moving ahead in the right direction For India.
So the conclusion is India and China forever enemies.
 
.
LMAO....it's so hilarious when I first saw the title, I said to myself..wow there most something fearsome with India 2014 that China should not underestimate but when I read the article, I just have a great laugh :lol:, instead of explain what make India in 2014 so special compare to India in 1962, the author was using China maritime issue and that China has to devote more force in Pacific to face Japan,Philippine,Vietnam & US hence China will be weakening in West front facing India.

...basically the author tried to say is " India is stong in 2014 because China has trouble in Pacific"
 
.
and india should keep thinking china still lives in 60 era. LOL


Prophets of doom, predicting dire prospects and consequences of a “two-front war”, are back in business, as the Modi government responds robustly to challenges on its borders posed by China and Pakistan. What has changed in the management of our borders since Modi became PM? New Delhi has sent an unambiguous message to Pakistan that support for cross-border infiltration and terrorism by Pakistani forces will be met by heavy bombardment from Indian side. The situation on the border with China has been deftly handled. Attempts by China’s Peoples’ Liberation Army at advancing its frontiers by new structures and roads were met by the structures being pulled down by the Indo-Tibetan Border Police, without any direct face-off between the two armies.

China now faces security challenges all across its maritime frontiers. Beijing’s arbitrary and unilateral definition of its maritime frontiers and its unilateral actions seeking to restrict flights over international air space close to its shores by an “Air Defence Identification Zone”, have been opposed by its maritime neighbours—South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia and Indonesia. Tensions have escalated on China’s maritime frontiers with Japan, Vietnam and Philippines. China’s assertiveness has forced the US to state that it stands by its security treaty and guarantees to Japan. The US and India have separately decided to proceed with enhancing Vietnam’s maritime defence capabilities. The US-Philippines security alliance is being revitalised.

In contrast, India has made it clear during the visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping that talks to resolve the border issue should continue, keeping in view the landmark 2005 agreement, whose provisions run counter to Chinese claims, especially in Arunachal Pradesh. More importantly, in an effort to ease the tense climate caused by border stand-offs, the two countries agreed to enhance contacts and cooperation between their militaries. It would, however, be incorrect to presume that the Sino-Indian border issue will be settled anytime soon. Nor can one presume that China will not continue to test our nerves by intruding into areas where its claims are contestable and questionable.

The recent flare-up in Chumar has made it clear to China that it cannot presume India will remain as lethargic as it was in recent years. China has to pay much more attention and concentrate the bulk of its armed forces on its Pacific shores, rather than on its western borders with India. In these circumstances, what strategic gain does China make by escalating tensions with India, in a test of wills that could be as indecisive, as what transpired in 1987, in Sumdorong Chu, in Arunachal Pradesh? Moreover, the India of 2014 is not the blustering, blundering, ill-prepared India of 1962. India, in turn, will have to adopt border management strategies that are effective and realistic, even as it continues to improve its logistics and enhance its firepower and deployment on its eastern borders.

Pakistan, like China, faces multiple security challenges. Border tensions between Iran and Pakistan have been steadily escalating over the last year. Iran accuses Pakistan of providing support, safe haven and arms to the extremist Sunni terrorist group, the Hizb e Adl. Iran has brought Pakistani actions to the notice of the UN Security Council. It has also threatened and carried out attacks on terrorist safe havens in Baluchistan. Pakistani support for the Afghan Taliban and Haqqani network have similarly escalated tensions along the AfPak border and led to a raging insurgency within Pakistan. Apart from dealing firmly with Pakistani support for and infiltration of terrorists in J&K and elsewhere in India, New Delhi now has the strategic space to pay back Pakistan in kind, for its actions. If India today faces a so-called “two front” challenge, China has invited challenges on its maritime boundaries with eight countries, while Pakistan has heated up its land boundaries on three fronts.

dadpartha@gmail.com
The writer is a former diplomat

China Must Realise India of 2014 is Not the India of 1962 -The New Indian Express
 
.
Definitely China has grown too. But so have its disputes with all its neighbors.

The article mentions China's territorial disputes too. In 2014 China has a problem with each one of its neighbors, excpet Pakistan. It is the not the case with India. We had only 2 enemies in 1962, China and Pakistan. In 2014 the enemy list remains the sane
"in 2014 China has a problem with each one of its neighbors, excpet Pakistan"? haha, for how long you indians would like to delusion yourself into such delusional belief? How many neighbours we have and how many we have problem with? moron.

besides, it is not about number of your opponent, but who your opponent is. one China is enough for you india even if you just have one opponent.
 
.
Some cultures are inclined to war and other acts of savagery, while others principal belief is of ahimsa.
 
.
It is not about 2014 or 1962, but such acts are only going to make the West stronger again. The out of control situation in Pakistan which has become a headache recently for Afghanistan and Iran, is not boding well for Pakistan's civilian foreign policy which wants to establish normalcy in relations, contrary to Pakistani generals.

Similarly, Chinese leader Xi Jingping and even his predecessor Hu Jintao have always expressed positivity and wanting to enhance peaceful cooperation with us for long time, something, that PLA supreme command is not understanding. This mis-communication or at the worst, loss of civilian authority over the militaries of two powerful nuclear countries shows that there is ample opportunity for certain elements, who fiddled in Ukraine, to play a big time spoil sport in stopping Asia's economic rise as a whole.

As a consequence of such actions, not only the chemistry with India, but also with other Southeast Asian countries and Japan is getting spoilt, giving US the perfect opportunity to return to Asia.

Conflicts in today's time will do nothing but send all our respective economies two decades back. Whether it is an economically frail Pakistan, us, an emerging Vietnam, or even a much stronger China; NO ONE stands to gain anything from aggression.

Some cultures are inclined to war and other acts of savagery, while others principal belief is of ahimsa.

You mean proper ahimsa. Not the Gandhian hijacked version.

However, in today's times such policies are impractical. We shouldn't be unilaterally aggressive, but never back down from a fight in case we are attacked.
 
.
As a consequence of such actions, not only the chemistry with India, but also with other Southeast Asian countries and Japan is getting spoilt, giving US the perfect opportunity to return to Asia.
What does it matter so called US return to Asia?
It is inferior PLA not other factor have made us to bear the reality that our own territory be in Indian control.
 
.
What does it matter so called US return to Asia?
It is inferior PLA not other factor have made us to bear the reality that our own territory be in Indian control.

I like your enthusiasm. But if you have seen historically, whenever outsiders come into a common region, there is always more problem for both sides. Realise this.
 
.
I like your enthusiasm. But if you have seen historically, whenever outsiders come into a common region, there is always more problem for both sides. Realise this.
Indian was once the outsider for Sikkim and you can say culturally you are the same and US and India in whatever situation are natural allies not only at that moment in 1962.We oriental is not strong enough now so we have no choice but to play games each other for outsiders.
 
.
You over estimate India here. I would say that India is ahead of everyone in s Asia. But even compare to se Asia nations. India is not more advanced. India has to shoot its superpower movie in Dubai. LOL. India in Asia di not stand out as a leader. Just a banana republic in the same class as Philippines though Philippines is more prosperous.

India doesn't need to be a superpower to be ahead of everyone in Asia except China. It seems political science is not your forte. USSR was not a superpower when it almost lost to Nazi Germany. But at the end of WW2, It was neck to neck with USA. On the other hand, Great Britain was a mighty superpower before WW2. Look what happened afterwards. India's sheer size, population (even if say 60 percent is moderately educated and skilled labour) and military might is enough to beat any other country in Asia (except China).

BTW, this Superpower stuff is over hyped. Except for USA, nobody is or will be a superpower in the near future. In fact, USA will lose its superpower status once China rivals it and India/ Russia catch up somewhat to dominate their respective regions.
 
.
I think India shouldn't be compared to China, as it's a comparison between apples and oranges..

India's rated a free country by global freedom index, whereas China's rated as not free..

Where people can't even elect their own leaders, all further comparisons are a moot point, be it an economic or a military comparison..

1962 happened because of a blunder by Nehru, the lesson was learnt, and will never be repeated..
 
.
Definitely China has grown too. But so have its disputes with all its neighbors.

The article mentions China's territorial disputes too. In 2014 China has a problem with each one of its neighbors, excpet Pakistan. It is the not the case with India. We had only 2 enemies in 1962, China and Pakistan. In 2014 the enemy list remains the sane
The lankans and bangladeshies would disagree. Any around would be an enemy of India if they do not accept Indian hegemony.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom