What's new

China losing patience with Pak over Azhar?

China never takes un-calculated risks.
We should not burden chinese with terrorist matters.

Terrorists or Pakistani agents , are Pakistan's headache.

We feel thankful for chinese support so far.
We don't want to be North Korea which needs china on every matter. We can handle this on our own. We should solve our problems ourselves.

We are not North Korea.
 
. .
It's funny that Pakistani members are finding joy on "Veto on Azhar issue", and then sometimes they ask why we think Pakistanis are delusional. Azhar is a terrorist freed from Indian jail by hijacking an International flight.And yet,here we are,a state begging another state to veto to declare their " Asset" a terrorist. I guess Saeed is still a "Social Worker" to most of them.
A Question..? How he ended up in indian jail..?
Second if you think hafiz saeed is a terrorist involved with concrete evidence.. Why don't you public all the information if Pakistan is not cooperating.. (or you don't have any evidence)'
Plz answer both questions.thanks
 
.
So your PM is the murderer of thousands of innocent muslims in Gujrat and was banned from entering US. Your terror-love nation elected a terrorist as PM from a terrorist organization's platform, RSS. Does it make any difference?
A true Pakistani response.

Perhaps you missed Modi's speech in US Parliament.

I'm waiting for the day when Hafiz Saeed or Azhar would do the same.[emoji23]
 
.
My differences apart, Saeed's organization actually has a big social service wing in Pakistan.
Of course it is,so are Taliban who are providing "Social Services" to Afghanistan, right?

By the way,Saeed's organization already changed its name to get temporary relief from Sanction World has imposed on it.Never saw "Social workers" got sanctioned in India
 
.
Though Beijing once again blocked a proposal to declare the JeM chief a global terrorist, informed sources suggest Beijing is running out of patience


Even as China on Tuesday once again blocked a proposal by the United States to designate Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) Chief Masood Azhar a global terrorist, there is a visible discomfort now in Beijing on repeatedly bailing out Pakistan at the United Nations (UN) by using its veto power. This is especially so as it comes at a time when China itself is facing a terrorist and secessionist movement in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. In fact, an informed source in India said that Beijing has been conveying to Islamabad quietly for some time now to find answers to this issue.

Pakistani media too have been reporting on this. Quoting Chinese diplomatic sources, these media reports stated that Beijing has been expressing its displeasure with Pakistan for repeatedly asking for its veto on the Azhar issue.

"As a super power, China cannot relegate itself at the UN to focus on this single issue of blocking the proposal every time. Pakistan must find some answers to the problem to satisfy world community," reported Urdu daily Dunya on Monday, hours before the issue was again raked up at the United Nations.

In a blog post, China's former consul general in Kolkata Mao Siwei also called on his government to rethink its default policy of blocking India's attempts to include Azhar in the sanctioned list. Already, it is believed that Beijing is changing its stance towards its all-weather friend. Media reports from Pakistan say that Beijing's prodding played a role in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's decision to launch the Zarb-i-Azb operation against terrorists and also the latest move to put restrictions on the LeT chief Hafiz Sayeed, wanted in the 2008 Mumbai attack.

The US on Tuesday had moved the UN for banning Pathankot terrorist attack mastermind Azhar, barely weeks after India's failed efforts to get him banned by the UN in December last year. In a statement to the media on Tuesday, the Ministry of External Affairs said, "Informed of this development and matter has been taken up with Chinese Government."

India has consistently pitched for the listing of Azhar as a global designated terrorist at the UN, where it has initiated discussions with several member countries of the Security Council on the issue. In the past, China has thrice thwarted the move, saying it had adopted a "just, objective and professional" attitude in deciding the issue. The last resolution moved by India lapsed in December. The fresh move initiated by the US is expected to bear fruit.

With the new US administration headed by President Donald Trump, India is once again pushing for completing reforms of the UN Security Council, to blunt the edge that China currently enjoys. At the last General Assembly session, member countries adopted an oral decision paving the way for them to continue discussions on reforming the Security Council.

Pakistan though is continuing to do its best to thwart New Delhi's efforts. On Tuesday, Pakistan's Ambassador to the UN Maleeha Lodhi rejected the attempts of states seeking permanent UN Security Council membership, saying it is "inconceivable" that any institution does not value "principles of representation and accountability" through periodic elections. She was referring to the Group of Four (G4)?India, Brazil, Germany and Japan?that has been demanding permanent membership of the 15-member body for the past 20 years.

Meanwhile, scholars and experts from Asian Studies Centre, The Heritage Foundation; Georgetown University; National Defence University, New America; Hudson Institute; Brookings Institution; Centre for Strategic and International Studies and the Middle East Institute jointly compiled this report that includes recommendations for the Trump administration, which took oath on January 20 and has not yet spelled out its Pakistan policy. The report argues that the US engagement with Pakistan must be based on a realistic appraisal of the country's policies, aspirations, and worldview.

"The US must stop chasing the mirage of securing change in Pakistan's strategic direction by giving it additional aid or military equipment. It must be acknowledged that Pakistan is unlikely to change its current policies through inducements alone," the report says. The working group which compiled the report wants the US to recognise that its efforts over several decades to strengthen Pakistan militarily have only "encouraged those elements in Pakistan that hope someday to wrest Kashmir from India through force."

The group acknowledges that there is no silver bullet that can change decades of Pakistani policy, but a tougher stance could persuade Pakistan to cooperate with the United States.

NIA court issues summons to JeM chief, 3 others
The NIA Special Court at Mohali in Punjab has issued Proclamation Orders under section 82 of the CrPC against JeM Chief Masood Azhar, his deputy and brother, Mufti Abdul Rauf Asgar, Deputy Chief of JeM, Shahid Lateef and Kashif Jan. The four are the main accused in the Pathankot Air force station attack that took place in January last year. The NIA Special Court has ordered the absconding accused to appear before the Court on March 9.
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-china-losing-patience-with-pak-over-azhar-2315610
Be careful, Chinese might bid for Dalai Lama/Whole Tibat for M Azhar. lolzz
 
.
Of course it is,so are Taliban who are providing "Social Services" to Afghanistan, right?
Is this an attempt at trolling?
Taliban has no social service wing like JuD. You can find JuD in Thar and in anywhere in Pakistan when disasters struck.
 
.
Though Beijing once again blocked a proposal to declare the JeM chief a global terrorist, informed sources suggest Beijing is running out of patience


Even as China on Tuesday once again blocked a proposal by the United States to designate Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) Chief Masood Azhar a global terrorist, there is a visible discomfort now in Beijing on repeatedly bailing out Pakistan at the United Nations (UN) by using its veto power. This is especially so as it comes at a time when China itself is facing a terrorist and secessionist movement in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. In fact, an informed source in India said that Beijing has been conveying to Islamabad quietly for some time now to find answers to this issue.

Pakistani media too have been reporting on this. Quoting Chinese diplomatic sources, these media reports stated that Beijing has been expressing its displeasure with Pakistan for repeatedly asking for its veto on the Azhar issue.

"As a super power, China cannot relegate itself at the UN to focus on this single issue of blocking the proposal every time. Pakistan must find some answers to the problem to satisfy world community," reported Urdu daily Dunya on Monday, hours before the issue was again raked up at the United Nations.

In a blog post, China's former consul general in Kolkata Mao Siwei also called on his government to rethink its default policy of blocking India's attempts to include Azhar in the sanctioned list. Already, it is believed that Beijing is changing its stance towards its all-weather friend. Media reports from Pakistan say that Beijing's prodding played a role in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's decision to launch the Zarb-i-Azb operation against terrorists and also the latest move to put restrictions on the LeT chief Hafiz Sayeed, wanted in the 2008 Mumbai attack.

The US on Tuesday had moved the UN for banning Pathankot terrorist attack mastermind Azhar, barely weeks after India's failed efforts to get him banned by the UN in December last year. In a statement to the media on Tuesday, the Ministry of External Affairs said, "Informed of this development and matter has been taken up with Chinese Government."

India has consistently pitched for the listing of Azhar as a global designated terrorist at the UN, where it has initiated discussions with several member countries of the Security Council on the issue. In the past, China has thrice thwarted the move, saying it had adopted a "just, objective and professional" attitude in deciding the issue. The last resolution moved by India lapsed in December. The fresh move initiated by the US is expected to bear fruit.

With the new US administration headed by President Donald Trump, India is once again pushing for completing reforms of the UN Security Council, to blunt the edge that China currently enjoys. At the last General Assembly session, member countries adopted an oral decision paving the way for them to continue discussions on reforming the Security Council.

Pakistan though is continuing to do its best to thwart New Delhi's efforts. On Tuesday, Pakistan's Ambassador to the UN Maleeha Lodhi rejected the attempts of states seeking permanent UN Security Council membership, saying it is "inconceivable" that any institution does not value "principles of representation and accountability" through periodic elections. She was referring to the Group of Four (G4)?India, Brazil, Germany and Japan?that has been demanding permanent membership of the 15-member body for the past 20 years.

Meanwhile, scholars and experts from Asian Studies Centre, The Heritage Foundation; Georgetown University; National Defence University, New America; Hudson Institute; Brookings Institution; Centre for Strategic and International Studies and the Middle East Institute jointly compiled this report that includes recommendations for the Trump administration, which took oath on January 20 and has not yet spelled out its Pakistan policy. The report argues that the US engagement with Pakistan must be based on a realistic appraisal of the country's policies, aspirations, and worldview.

"The US must stop chasing the mirage of securing change in Pakistan's strategic direction by giving it additional aid or military equipment. It must be acknowledged that Pakistan is unlikely to change its current policies through inducements alone," the report says. The working group which compiled the report wants the US to recognise that its efforts over several decades to strengthen Pakistan militarily have only "encouraged those elements in Pakistan that hope someday to wrest Kashmir from India through force."

The group acknowledges that there is no silver bullet that can change decades of Pakistani policy, but a tougher stance could persuade Pakistan to cooperate with the United States.

NIA court issues summons to JeM chief, 3 others
The NIA Special Court at Mohali in Punjab has issued Proclamation Orders under section 82 of the CrPC against JeM Chief Masood Azhar, his deputy and brother, Mufti Abdul Rauf Asgar, Deputy Chief of JeM, Shahid Lateef and Kashif Jan. The four are the main accused in the Pathankot Air force station attack that took place in January last year. The NIA Special Court has ordered the absconding accused to appear before the Court on March 9.
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-china-losing-patience-with-pak-over-azhar-2315610

A true Pakistani response.

Perhaps you missed Modi's speech in US Parliament.

I'm waiting for the day when Hafiz Saeed or Azhar would do the same.[emoji23]
India is only counting on the size of its population and market to force her agenda on the rest of the world. This article is another propaganda to cause fear in the hearts of Pakistanis. Pakistan, though smaller in size and economy, is more than capable of sending India to stone-age. Any effort to put Pakistan against the wall be the last blunder India ever committed before being evaporated.

Of course it is,so are Taliban who are providing "Social Services" to Afghanistan, right?

By the way,Saeed's organization already changed its name to get temporary relief from Sanction World has imposed on it.Never saw "Social workers" got sanctioned in India
India is trying to BS Pakistan while sitting in lap of USA, not understanding days of US hegemony are numbered and so are India's.
 
. .
Though Beijing once again blocked a proposal to declare the JeM chief a global terrorist, informed sources suggest Beijing is running out of patience


Even as China on Tuesday once again blocked a proposal by the United States to designate Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) Chief Masood Azhar a global terrorist, there is a visible discomfort now in Beijing on repeatedly bailing out Pakistan at the United Nations (UN) by using its veto power. This is especially so as it comes at a time when China itself is facing a terrorist and secessionist movement in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. In fact, an informed source in India said that Beijing has been conveying to Islamabad quietly for some time now to find answers to this issue.

Pakistani media too have been reporting on this. Quoting Chinese diplomatic sources, these media reports stated that Beijing has been expressing its displeasure with Pakistan for repeatedly asking for its veto on the Azhar issue.

"As a super power, China cannot relegate itself at the UN to focus on this single issue of blocking the proposal every time. Pakistan must find some answers to the problem to satisfy world community," reported Urdu daily Dunya on Monday, hours before the issue was again raked up at the United Nations.

In a blog post, China's former consul general in Kolkata Mao Siwei also called on his government to rethink its default policy of blocking India's attempts to include Azhar in the sanctioned list. Already, it is believed that Beijing is changing its stance towards its all-weather friend. Media reports from Pakistan say that Beijing's prodding played a role in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's decision to launch the Zarb-i-Azb operation against terrorists and also the latest move to put restrictions on the LeT chief Hafiz Sayeed, wanted in the 2008 Mumbai attack.

The US on Tuesday had moved the UN for banning Pathankot terrorist attack mastermind Azhar, barely weeks after India's failed efforts to get him banned by the UN in December last year. In a statement to the media on Tuesday, the Ministry of External Affairs said, "Informed of this development and matter has been taken up with Chinese Government."

India has consistently pitched for the listing of Azhar as a global designated terrorist at the UN, where it has initiated discussions with several member countries of the Security Council on the issue. In the past, China has thrice thwarted the move, saying it had adopted a "just, objective and professional" attitude in deciding the issue. The last resolution moved by India lapsed in December. The fresh move initiated by the US is expected to bear fruit.

With the new US administration headed by President Donald Trump, India is once again pushing for completing reforms of the UN Security Council, to blunt the edge that China currently enjoys. At the last General Assembly session, member countries adopted an oral decision paving the way for them to continue discussions on reforming the Security Council.

Pakistan though is continuing to do its best to thwart New Delhi's efforts. On Tuesday, Pakistan's Ambassador to the UN Maleeha Lodhi rejected the attempts of states seeking permanent UN Security Council membership, saying it is "inconceivable" that any institution does not value "principles of representation and accountability" through periodic elections. She was referring to the Group of Four (G4)?India, Brazil, Germany and Japan?that has been demanding permanent membership of the 15-member body for the past 20 years.

Meanwhile, scholars and experts from Asian Studies Centre, The Heritage Foundation; Georgetown University; National Defence University, New America; Hudson Institute; Brookings Institution; Centre for Strategic and International Studies and the Middle East Institute jointly compiled this report that includes recommendations for the Trump administration, which took oath on January 20 and has not yet spelled out its Pakistan policy. The report argues that the US engagement with Pakistan must be based on a realistic appraisal of the country's policies, aspirations, and worldview.

"The US must stop chasing the mirage of securing change in Pakistan's strategic direction by giving it additional aid or military equipment. It must be acknowledged that Pakistan is unlikely to change its current policies through inducements alone," the report says. The working group which compiled the report wants the US to recognise that its efforts over several decades to strengthen Pakistan militarily have only "encouraged those elements in Pakistan that hope someday to wrest Kashmir from India through force."

The group acknowledges that there is no silver bullet that can change decades of Pakistani policy, but a tougher stance could persuade Pakistan to cooperate with the United States.

NIA court issues summons to JeM chief, 3 others
The NIA Special Court at Mohali in Punjab has issued Proclamation Orders under section 82 of the CrPC against JeM Chief Masood Azhar, his deputy and brother, Mufti Abdul Rauf Asgar, Deputy Chief of JeM, Shahid Lateef and Kashif Jan. The four are the main accused in the Pathankot Air force station attack that took place in January last year. The NIA Special Court has ordered the absconding accused to appear before the Court on March 9.
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-china-losing-patience-with-pak-over-azhar-2315610

Most of all taking out of context. The way Americans poked their nose inside by reintroducing law Crafted for India against JEM Pakistan. This is very aggressive posture reaction to China's ego on these important issues especially for south Asia stability and peace.

China for long using its Bullying tactic's against super powers so it feels equal and treated as one by them. No US placed it's its own bill to Mount pressure like never before. China will have do this with the majority of the countries if it will keep supporting Pakistan and terrorist organizations.

Chinese anger is justified . It's not a pretty good situation where you will stand alone veto others and their best efforts to get it passed. Well ! Chinese will learn the lesson in hard way. I can see Pakistan is out of breathe now. Need to be careful. As this joint effort India is doing to pass this bill against China and Pakistan might influence other issues especially indo pak issues . China can't spending it's resources to firefight for someone else issues. As South China is a big gamble for China. It might turn into a fortune for decades to come placing China as great Super power or it will break the country into pieces . As the fight is like 1 against the rest of the world at least 70℅ of them

And that's why I think Pakistan should be prepared. China want it's receiver country to accept China as it's sole leader. This lead to these new US Pakistan tension which is very very very important to Pakistans national interest at global stage .

But here we are !!! No one else except China North Korea
 
.
A true Pakistani response.

Perhaps you missed Modi's speech in US Parliament.

I'm waiting for the day when Hafiz Saeed or Azhar would do the same.[emoji23]
The speech was given was PM of India but not by Ner. Modi himself. What if someday Hafiz Saeed or Mulana Azhar become PM of Pakistan, they will be given the same protocol. :) Indians and logic- both on opposite poles
 
.
Though Beijing once again blocked a proposal to declare the JeM chief a global terrorist, informed sources suggest Beijing is running out of patience


Even as China on Tuesday once again blocked a proposal by the United States to designate Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) Chief Masood Azhar a global terrorist, there is a visible discomfort now in Beijing on repeatedly bailing out Pakistan at the United Nations (UN) by using its veto power. This is especially so as it comes at a time when China itself is facing a terrorist and secessionist movement in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. In fact, an informed source in India said that Beijing has been conveying to Islamabad quietly for some time now to find answers to this issue.

Pakistani media too have been reporting on this. Quoting Chinese diplomatic sources, these media reports stated that Beijing has been expressing its displeasure with Pakistan for repeatedly asking for its veto on the Azhar issue.

"As a super power, China cannot relegate itself at the UN to focus on this single issue of blocking the proposal every time. Pakistan must find some answers to the problem to satisfy world community," reported Urdu daily Dunya on Monday, hours before the issue was again raked up at the United Nations.

In a blog post, China's former consul general in Kolkata Mao Siwei also called on his government to rethink its default policy of blocking India's attempts to include Azhar in the sanctioned list. Already, it is believed that Beijing is changing its stance towards its all-weather friend. Media reports from Pakistan say that Beijing's prodding played a role in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's decision to launch the Zarb-i-Azb operation against terrorists and also the latest move to put restrictions on the LeT chief Hafiz Sayeed, wanted in the 2008 Mumbai attack.

The US on Tuesday had moved the UN for banning Pathankot terrorist attack mastermind Azhar, barely weeks after India's failed efforts to get him banned by the UN in December last year. In a statement to the media on Tuesday, the Ministry of External Affairs said, "Informed of this development and matter has been taken up with Chinese Government."

India has consistently pitched for the listing of Azhar as a global designated terrorist at the UN, where it has initiated discussions with several member countries of the Security Council on the issue. In the past, China has thrice thwarted the move, saying it had adopted a "just, objective and professional" attitude in deciding the issue. The last resolution moved by India lapsed in December. The fresh move initiated by the US is expected to bear fruit.

With the new US administration headed by President Donald Trump, India is once again pushing for completing reforms of the UN Security Council, to blunt the edge that China currently enjoys. At the last General Assembly session, member countries adopted an oral decision paving the way for them to continue discussions on reforming the Security Council.

Pakistan though is continuing to do its best to thwart New Delhi's efforts. On Tuesday, Pakistan's Ambassador to the UN Maleeha Lodhi rejected the attempts of states seeking permanent UN Security Council membership, saying it is "inconceivable" that any institution does not value "principles of representation and accountability" through periodic elections. She was referring to the Group of Four (G4)?India, Brazil, Germany and Japan?that has been demanding permanent membership of the 15-member body for the past 20 years.

Meanwhile, scholars and experts from Asian Studies Centre, The Heritage Foundation; Georgetown University; National Defence University, New America; Hudson Institute; Brookings Institution; Centre for Strategic and International Studies and the Middle East Institute jointly compiled this report that includes recommendations for the Trump administration, which took oath on January 20 and has not yet spelled out its Pakistan policy. The report argues that the US engagement with Pakistan must be based on a realistic appraisal of the country's policies, aspirations, and worldview.

"The US must stop chasing the mirage of securing change in Pakistan's strategic direction by giving it additional aid or military equipment. It must be acknowledged that Pakistan is unlikely to change its current policies through inducements alone," the report says. The working group which compiled the report wants the US to recognise that its efforts over several decades to strengthen Pakistan militarily have only "encouraged those elements in Pakistan that hope someday to wrest Kashmir from India through force."

The group acknowledges that there is no silver bullet that can change decades of Pakistani policy, but a tougher stance could persuade Pakistan to cooperate with the United States.

NIA court issues summons to JeM chief, 3 others
The NIA Special Court at Mohali in Punjab has issued Proclamation Orders under section 82 of the CrPC against JeM Chief Masood Azhar, his deputy and brother, Mufti Abdul Rauf Asgar, Deputy Chief of JeM, Shahid Lateef and Kashif Jan. The four are the main accused in the Pathankot Air force station attack that took place in January last year. The NIA Special Court has ordered the absconding accused to appear before the Court on March 9.
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-china-losing-patience-with-pak-over-azhar-2315610



EPIC FAIL!!!!!!!..........Source is indian so it immediately becomes extreme propaganda, worthless, null and void. Move on everyone.
 
.
I Azhar is a terrorist then Modi is also a terrorist who murdered thousands of innocent Gujaratis. Modi needs to be taken to the Hauge for war crimes. Mad dog Modi
 
.
It is fun watching being atheist and wana be super power defending Islamic terrorist in question every few months. There will be pay off for india sometime in future. Good Job China keep it up, keep defending.
 
.
The speech was given was PM of India but not by Ner. Modi himself. What if someday Hafiz Saeed or Mulana Azhar become PM of Pakistan, they will be given the same protocol. :) Indians and logic- both on opposite poles
And that's what has been said.

Modi proved his innocence in Indian courts about riot,became PM and went USA as head of Indian Govt.

But Pakistanis has habit of staying some parallel universe.they don't even understand that even as head of some country can't get US Visa if they commit crimes against humanity.

Kindly read how Pakistani leaders got refused US visa recently even though no such crimes.As we say,Pakistanis and reality are antonym.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom