CHINA HAS CREATED A RACIST A.I. TO TRACK MUSLIMS

[nang2]

Your use of specific language "Not worse than Google's facial recognition"; it is the use of a comparative language.

Yes, it is comparative. Does being comparative make it a rebuttal? Can a man think of something somewhat similar upon another?

The only reason I can think of on why you thought it was a rebuttal is because of your militant attribute. Your heart is filled with aggressiveness that any word that doesn't agree with you looks like a rebuttal. If you are a Muslim, I suggest you pray more diligently, starting with "In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful", particularly focusing on "Gracious" and "Merciful".

 

[Foggy_Bottom]

As if Muslims are not tracked in US and A.
Btw its funny how any Chinese development is portrayed as anti Muslim. the AI is also used to track all Chinese citizens when registering for a SIM.

Muslims are not tracked as a group in the US. We know you know that being an American resident, but we also know why you would make such a statement. There was a controversial program once in NY, no longer permitted or practiced, of infiltrating mosques after 911 (terrible terrible idea).

However, it seems you would be fine with the US creating the same program on a single group - Muslims. As long as they track criminals too.

 

[beijingwalker]

Chinese pupils scan faces at facial recognition gate

China Foils Toilet Paper Thieves With Facial Recognition Tech | CNA Insider

 

[Foggy_Bottom]

Yes, it is comparative. Does being comparative make it a rebuttal? Can a man think of something somewhat similar upon another?

The only reason I can think of on why you thought it was a rebuttal is because of your militant attribute. Your heart is filled with aggressiveness that any word that doesn't agree with you looks like a rebuttal. If you are a Muslim, I suggest you pray more diligently, starting with "In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful", particularly focusing on "Gracious" and "Merciful".

 

[FedererExpress]

It is obvious that the CCP seeks racial purity. The CCP is a Han-supremacist Party. Racial supremacy is the core value of the CCP. That’s exactly why the free world must do everything in our power to seek the end of the CCP’s rule over China.

 

[beijingwalker]

It is obvious that the CCP seeks racial purity. The CCP is a Han-supremacist Party. Racial supremacy is the core value of the CCP. That’s exactly why the free world must do everything in our power to seek the end of the CCP’s rule over China.

loL, A new recruit joining PDF not for discussion but a sole purpose of bashing China. An Australian whose whole life is revolving around China..

 

[dBSPL]

The issue of social credit system is more dystopic than facial recognition technology. This is such a problematic issue that it may lead direction of the behavior of many Chinese who interact here.

 

[FedererExpress]

The issue of social credit system is more dystopic than facial recognition technology. This is such a problematic issue that it may lead direction of the behavior of many Chinese who interact here.

It’s pure evil mate. Innocent Chinese people who speak against the CCP are denied their basic human rights. The CCP uses the social credit system for total control over the population. How can any rational and fair minded person support such a dystopian system. I’ve got a few Chinese mates who absolutely loathe the Communist Party.

 

[nang2]

It is obvious that the CCP seeks racial purity. The CCP is a Han-supremacist Party. Racial supremacy is the core value of the CCP. That’s exactly why the free world must do everything in our power to seek the end of the CCP’s rule over China.

That is very ignorant statement. China is Han dominating. But that doesn't make CCP a Han-supremacist party. In fact, there is no concept of Han supremacy. There are simply so many of Han Chinese that other races are not considered much. But CCP as a socialist party actually behaves in a complete reverse of a supremacist, mostly because of communism doctrine that dedicates that all races are equal. In China, the affirmative policy is applied much more than other countries, to the detriment of Han folks. If you call that a supremacist, I would say "supremacist my ***".

It’s pure evil mate. Innocent Chinese people who speak against the CCP are denied their basic human rights. The CCP uses the social credit system for total control over the population. How can any rational and fair minded person support such a dystopian system. I’ve got a few Chinese mates who absolutely loathe the Communist Party.

Before you throw out the words like "basic human rights", you should define them first. It is really difficult to debate on things like these without an agreement on what they actually mean.

 

[IceCold]

West love for Muslim only arise when it comes to China. Kashmirs, Palestinians are not muslims/humans enough.

 

[t1000]

News Flash: Muslim is not a race.

That being said china is a high tech class A police state.
USA, Russia, India are all police states too but to much lesser degrees.

 

[TruthSeeker]

China is the world's most powerful and technologically competent authoritarian state. However it is also quasi-democratic in the sense that its ruling cadres are of the ethnic group that is in the overwhelming majority. So, if there were a mob-rule democratic vote on questions like: "Should the government monitor and proactively intervene before Uighur terrorists commit acts of terror?"; the majority Han population would democratically vote "YES!!!" What is most missing from the Chinese political system is an enforced, constitutionally mandated, set of individual citizen rights. That is, one-party, ethnic majority rule might be tolerable if all citizens had a good set of legal protections of their property, selves and human needs for communication and association.

 

[nang2]

West love for Muslim only arise when it comes to China. Kashmirs, Palestinians are not muslims/humans enough.

West don't love Muslim. They only love sticks that can be used to throw at Chinese.

 

[TruthSeeker]

West don't love Muslim. They only love sticks that can be used to throw at Chinese.

Perhaps. China don't love Muslim. They only love sticks that can be used to throw at West.

 

[nang2]

Perhaps. China don't love Muslim. They only love sticks that can be used to throw at West.

Of course. Muslims aren't looking for love, either. They have all the love they can dream of from Allah.