What's new

Featured China firm, Kashmir-like festering zone looms

FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
18,063
Reaction score
12
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
The seventh round of military talks between India and China failed to achieve a breakthrough on the border standoff, triggering apprehensions that the Ladakh frontier could now become a permanently contested militarised zone akin to Jammu and Kashmir.
Sources said Beijing continued to resist New Delhi’s demand for disengagement and de-escalation of troops from multiple friction points in eastern Ladakh along the Line of Actual Control. As many as 18 rounds of military and diplomatic talks have taken place since May but nothing much has changed on the ground, an official said.
A joint statement issued by the defence ministries on Tuesday night said: “Both sides agreed to maintain dialogue and communication through military and diplomatic channels, and arrive at a mutually acceptable solution for disengagement as early as possible.”
The defence ministries’ statement added: “Both sides agreed to earnestly implement the important understandings reached by the leaders of the two countries, not to turn differences into disputes, and jointly safeguard peace and tranquillity in the border areas.”
In Beijing, the Chinese foreign ministry pinpointed India’s heightened infrastructure development and military deployment along the border as the “root cause” of tensions.
China iterated that Beijing does not recognise the new Union Territory of Ladakh and also Arunachal Pradesh, where 16 of the 44 bridges commissioned by defence minister Rajnath Singh on Monday are located.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian identified the border infrastructure on the Indian side as the main reason for the face-off between the two countries since May while responding to a specific question at a routine media conference on India opening multiple bridges, many of them providing all-weather access to the disputed border with China.
“For a while, the Indian side has been stepping up infrastructure building and military deployment along the border with China. This is the root cause of tensions. We urge the Indian side to earnestly implement the consensus reached by the two sides, refrain from taking actions that will complicate the situation, and take concrete measures to safeguard peace and tranquillity along the border,” Zhao said.
The question had specifically referred to eight of the bridges being located in Ladakh and another eight in Arunachal Pradesh, drawing a sharp iteration from Zhao. “China doesn’t recognise the so-called ‘Ladakh Union Territory’ illegally set up by India, or ‘Arunachal Pradesh’, and opposes infrastructure building aimed at military contention in disputed border areas,” the spokesperson said.

 
China is just exposing its own hypocrisy to the world. So India's Ladakh is illegal, what about China's Tibet and Xinjiang? Autonomous regions are you kidding me? If they were autonomous then there would be no political prisoners. Why is the Dali Lama in India and not Tibet?


Everything maybe going according to the SCRIPT, with Indians realizing it very late with a rude awakening.
 
China is just exposing its own hypocrisy to the world. So India's Ladakh is illegal, what about China's Tibet and Xinjiang? Autonomous regions are you kidding me? If they were autonomous then there would be no political prisoners. Why is the Dali Lama in India and not Tibet?
send Huawei's daughter back,then you can talk illegal or not. You kidnapping puppet country Canada.
 
What is even more shameful
There is nothing more shameful than surrendering to your enemy and nothing more humiliating than watching soldiers humiliated and to live with it for the rest of their existence. No amount of jibe is going to cover for that.
 
There is nothing more shameful than surrendering to your enemy and nothing more humiliating than watching soldiers humiliated and to live with it for the rest of their existence. No amount of jibe is going to cover for that.
True, but the topic at hand is about "might", so where is your might when a country that surrendered in large number, and is 5 times smaller than yours embarrassed the super duper power last year in front of the whole world? That is the extent of your "might".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
True, but the topic at hand is about "might", so where is your might when a country that surrendered in large number, and is 5 times smaller than yours embarrassed the super pooper power last year in front of the whole world? That is the extent of your "might".
Sure, India is mightier as per your own PMs. If you remember your (now dead) PMs speech at the UN, that's what he specifically mentioned. So, I simply applied your own logic to you, India is right. :azn:
 
Sure, India is mightier as per your own PMs. If you remember your (now dead) PMs speech at the UN, that's what he specifically mentioned. So, I simply applied your own logic to you, India is right. :azn:
Words are words, where is your might in action? All we witnessed was you getting embarrassed last year and that is a fact, and need I remind you we are 5 times smaller than you. If you call that might, please carry on, you clearly have problem grasping the concept.
 
Words are words, where is your might in action? All we witnessed was you getting embarrassed last year and that is a fact, and need I remind you we are 5 times smaller than you. If you call that might, please carry on, you clearly have problem grasping the concept.
Let's see, IAF intruded into Pakistan remember not any disputed territory but Pakistan (KPK), bombed and returned to its base. Pakistan next day intruded into J&K, got chased by some MiGs, the plane was shot down Wg Cmdr level officer was returned in a day. Let's say the reverse happened, PAF intruded into Indian territory (without getting shot down lol), reached Himachal, bombs a field, returns (if lucky). India would light up the entire border the next day. That's might, which you didn't show. Simple logic.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom