What's new

China Economy Forum

Smithfield shareholders OK Shuanghui takeover
By Gao Pan (Xinhua) 18:23, September 25, 2013

Smithfield shareholders OK Shuanghui takeover - People's Daily Online

shuang_hui_ji_tuan_logo.png

300px-Smithfield_Foods_logo.svg_2.png


Shareholders of Virginia-based Smithfield Foods approved Tuesday the acquisition by Chinese company Shuanghui International Holdings, clearing the last major hurdle to close the landmark deal.

More than 96 percent of votes cast at a special meeting of Smithfield shareholders were in favor of the transaction, which represents approximately 76 percent of the company's total outstanding shares of common stock, according to a statement released by Smithfield.

The deal, which combines the world's largest pork producer Smithfield with Shuanghui, the largest meat producer in China, is valued at about 7.1 billion U.S. dollars in total, including debt.

Smithfield expected to close the deal by Sept. 26, 2013, and once completed, it will become the biggest purchase of a U.S. company ever by a Chinese firm.

Smithfield shareholders will receive 34 dollars per share in cash for each share of common stock they own, and the company will continue to operate under its existing brand names as a subsidiary of Shuanghui International.

"This is a great transaction for all Smithfield stakeholders, as well as for American farmers and U.S. agriculture," Smithfield Chief Executive Larry Pope said.

"The partnership is all about growth, and about doing more business at home and abroad. It will remain business as usual -- only better -- at Smithfield," he added.

Shuanghui agreed the deal in May, and earlier this month won approval from the Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a government panel tasked with reviewing the national security risks of foreign acquisitions.

"Despite political noise from Congress, the CFIUS process stuck to its national security mandate and rightly approved the transaction," Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington D.C.-based think tank, told Xinhua.

Some U.S. lawmakers have expressed concerns that the acquisition of Smithfield by a Chinese company could pose a threat to U.S. food security.

Smithfield has reassured investors and customers that the deal was not about bringing Chinese pork products to the United States, but about exporting U.S. pork products and expertise to meet the growing demand of China's middle class. Both Shuanghui and Smithfield will continue to commit to producing high quality food products.

This deal shows "China's firms are eager to build their ability to service more sophisticated consumers," Daniel Rosen, the founding partner of Rhodium Group, a New York-based advisory firm that focuses on Chinese business, told Xinhua.

This should put an end to old beliefs that "Chinese firms are only interested in natural resources," he said.

Recent Chinese investment in the United States has shown that Chinese firms are gearing up for a more consumer-based growth model in China, with growing interest in consumer goods, healthcare and technology assets, Thilo Hanemann, a research director at Rhodium Group echoed Rosen.

Shuanghui said it is "especially attracted by Smithfield for its strong management team, leading brands and vertically integrated model" and it will learn a lot from the industry leader.

Therefore, it will be a win-win deal that benefits both countries and advances China-U.S. relations. As China is rebalancing its economic growth model and has agreed to start negotiation on a bilateral investment treaty with Washington, Chinese investments in the United States should not always raise real concerns, but be welcome.
(Editor:GaoYinan、Wang Jinxue)
 
September 26th 2013

635 km Xiangtang-Putian Railway opens

97f6735fjw1e8zm37y0o0j20qo0k040i.jpg


e61190ef76c6a7ef3eb50146fdfaaf51f3d.jpg


Jiangxi Province,and people of Jiangxi Province,especially those from the old revolutionary areas,your time is coming!:china::tup:
 
26 September 2013 Last updated at 05:54 GMT

China's CNOOC wins $2bn Uganda oil field contract

China's state-owned oil firm China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) has won a $2bn (£1.3bn) deal to develop an oil field in Uganda oil.

The Kingfisher field is estimated to hold 635 million barrels of oil, of which 196 million are recoverable.

It is the latest in a series of investments by Chinese firms in overseas oil and gas resources.

Chinese firms have been looking to secure energy resources to meet growing domestic demand.

CNOOC will develop the Kingfisher oil field over a period of four years.

According to Peter Lokeris, Uganda's junior energy minister, the field will have an initial capacity to produce between 30,000 to 40,000 barrels of oil per day.

Other deals
China's rapid economic expansion and urbanisation in recent years has led to increasing demand for fuel, making it one of the biggest consumers of oil in the world.

That demand is expected to rise even further as its economy continues to grow.

But China relies heavily on imports to meet that demand.

As a result, Chinese firms have been looking to invest in oil and gas resources in an attempt to secure supplies.

Last year, CNOOC agreed to pay $15.1bn to acquire Canadian firm Nexen, making it China's largest foreign business takeover.

In December, another state-owned firm, PetroChina, agreed a $2.2bn deal to buy a 49.9% stake in Canadian firm Encana's natural gas project in Alberta.

That project contains supplies equivalent to nearly nine billion barrels of oil.

PetroChina also signed another deal last year to buy BHP Billiton's stake in an Australian liquefied natural gas project.

BBC News - China's CNOOC wins $2bn Uganda oil field contract
 
This is something Chinese government should make an effort to crack down on. Many Chinese are afraid to buyvtheir nation's products. This also gives a bad rep to good Chinese companies.
 
Hmm it's not really something new. It's been there way of living ever since.

They are actually proud of producing garbage-quality products that are defective, low class, fake and disposable which also tainted with lead, melamine, formalin, cyanide just to name a few, unmindful of the harmful effects to humans.

That's why the public should really be careful and aware of this.
Your computer is sure to contain garbage-quality, defective, low class, fake and disposable components from China. Please shut it down and remove yourself from the internet. Same applies when you have a smartphone or even cellphone of any kind. Therefore, you should stick to shouting as your primary method of communication with your fellow baboons.

While China needs to improve on product safety, you are going full retard on your statement.
 
Hmm it's not really something new. It's been there way of living ever since.

They are actually proud of producing garbage-quality products that are defective, low class, fake and disposable which also tainted with lead, melamine, formalin, cyanide just to name a few, unmindful of the harmful effects to humans.

That's why the public should really be careful and aware of this.

Stop trolling. The poor quality products are made from poor companies, while the high end products are made from larger companies.

Stop making idiotic posts.
 
The market will correct itself

The evidence of still a strong export oriented economy after so many years and going is a testament for the quality of our products and improving quality control.
 
Your computer is sure to contain garbage-quality, defective, low class, fake and disposable components from China. Please shut it down and remove yourself from the internet. Same applies when you have a smartphone or even cellphone of any kind. Therefore, you should stick to shouting as your primary method of communication with your fellow baboons.

While China needs to improve on product safety, you are going full retard on your statement.

We buy part from Taiwan Korea and Japan your so called parts is always in the bottom because its low quality review your evidence before posting it you arrogant jerk.

Stop trolling. The poor quality products are made from poor companies, while the high end products are made from larger companies.

Stop making idiotic posts.

Wow and you call his post stupid maybe in china that makes sense but not in the real world
 
We buy part from Taiwan Korea and Japan your so called parts is always in the bottom because its low quality review your evidence before posting it you arrogant jerk.



Wow and you call his post stupid maybe in china that makes sense but not in the real world
Oh you funny little baboon. Vast majority of computer components have Chinese parts one way of the other. Did you think Taiwan, South Korea and Japan make the complete production chain? If so, you are even more retarded than I thought. Even the much touted iPhone 5S and Samsung Galaxies are made in China under contract from Apple and Samsung. Perhaps you should stick to the topic of growing bananas or housekeeping, since that is all your country is capable of.
 
Oh you funny little baboon. Vast majority of computer components have Chinese parts one way of the other. Did you think Taiwan, South Korea and Japan make the complete production chain? If so, you are even more retarded than I thought. Even the much touted iPhone 5S and Samsung Galaxies are made in China under contract from Apple and Samsung. Perhaps you should stick to the topic of growing bananas or housekeeping, since that is all your country is capable of.

Dude when Apple and Samsung give contract to china who sets the standerd is it china or the company,the company sets the standerds.if a apple phone dosent function up to the standerd will the customer complain about the company or where it was manufactured.its the companys reputation which takes a beat.
If a chinese product has a problem its the chinese company which will take the blame.

I am not saying all chinese products are bad but i felt your line of argument is wrong .
 
Dude when Apple and Samsung give contract to china who sets the standerd is it china or the company,the company sets the standerds.if a apple phone dosent function up to the standerd will the customer complain about the company or where it was manufactured.its the companys reputation which takes a beat.
If a chinese product has a problem its the chinese company which will take the blame.

I am not saying all chinese products are bad but i felt your line of argument is wrong .
You get what you pay for. The specification are outlined by the contracting firm, not the Chinese production facilities. So why should China take the blame when it is the foreign companies that wanted the lowest price possible so they can increase their profit margin? You pay crap prices, and you shall receive crappy products.
 
You get what you pay for. The specification are outlined by the contracting firm, not the Chinese production facilities. So why should China take the blame when it is the foreign companies that wanted the lowest price possible so they can increase their profit margin? You pay crap prices, and you shall receive crappy products.

again your line of argument is wrong ..You are saying you pay less and so the product quality will be low... And you know your exports are due to competitive pricing.
 
China official services PMI hits six-month high, supported third-quarter pickup

BEIJING | Wed Oct 2, 2013 11:11pm EDT

(Reuters) - Activity in China's services sector expanded at the fastest pace in six months in September as demand grew, cementing a modest pickup in the world's second-largest economy.

The official purchasing managers' index (PMI) for the non-manufacturing sector rose to 55.4 in September - the highest reading since March - from 53.9 in August, the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) said on Thursday.

A reading above 50 indicates activity in the sector is accelerating, while one below 50 indicates it is slowing.

The upbeat reading on China's services sector activity helped market sentiment. Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index .HSI gained 0.8 percent and MSCI Asia ex-Japan index was up 0.7 percent while the Australian dollar also got a small lift.

The sub-index measuring new orders, from both home and abroad, rose to 53.4 in September from 50.9 in August, while input prices and services charges eased, the survey showed.

The services industry, which has so far weathered the global slowdown much better than the factory sector, is an increasingly important pillar in China's economy, especially as the government seeks to expand domestic consumption to drive growth.

Services accounted for about 45 percent of the economy in 2012 and is the biggest employer in China.

China has unveiled plans to open up its largely sheltered services sector to foreign competition and to test bold financial reforms in a new free trade zone in Shanghai.

The survey followed a pair of PMIs which showed slower than expected expansion in activity China's factory sector in September, with the official manufacturing PMI edging up to 51.1 from 51.0 in August, while the final HSBC PMI inched up to 50.2 from August's 50.1.

Beijing has stepped up efforts to head off a sharp economic slowdown by quickening railway investment and public housing construction and introducing measures to help smaller companies.

Recent economic data has shown some of the impact of those policies, with factory output in August hitting a 17-month high and retail sales growing at their fastest pace this year.

Most analysts have penciled-in a slight rebound of economic activity over the July-September quarter, although the outlook from here remains uncertain given global headwinds.

Peng Wensheng, chief economist at CICC, expects China's annual economic growth to have quickened to 7.8 percent in the third quarter from 7.5 percent in the previous quarter.

"We don't expect any big changes in economic policies, and monetary policy is likely to remain neutral, given steady economic growth and benign inflation," he said in a research note.

China's government has set a 7.5 percent growth target for the economy in 2013, a goal officials say would be met, but which would still mark the slowest pace of expansion in 23 years.

A private survey on China's services sector for September will be published on October 8. The Markit/HSBC services PMI hit a five-month high of 52.8 in August.

(Reporting by Li Hui and Kevin Yao; Editing by Eric Meijer)

China official services PMI hits six-month high, supported third-quarter pickup | Reuters
 
again your line of argument is wrong ..You are saying you pay less and so the product quality will be low... And you know your exports are due to competitive pricing.
It is you that is mistaken.

Even on high end machinery and products, we are still competitive because we manufacture on such a large scale. We have been exporting machine tools to Germany for over 2 years now, despite Germany makes some of the best machine tools in the world. China has the industrial capacity to produce anything from low end to high end. Like I said, specifications are outlined by the contracting firm, not the Chinese manufacturers. For example, if Nike the cheapest material to maximize profit, is China to blame or is Nike to blame.

Get your logic straight.
 
Back
Top Bottom