What's new

China Eastern crash appears to be intentional

Remember:


If they ground fleet and crash appears to be intentional, likely it's hardware remote hacking, not a human aboard culprit.

It's dangerous use Western Made hardware to life support devices, they have no remorse in kill civilian people when they need to geopolitical blackmail.
 
.
Not to be insensitive, but 4 flights since 1999? There are over 16 million flights a year. This isn't some massive conspiracy
 
.
Sounds like Boeing is trying to get off the hook for what looks to be a machanical failure. Lots of billions on the line so it’s pretty obvious what the motivation is.
 
. . .
Isn't it just speculation at the moment? There is no official release by Boeing or CAA of China.
 
.
A large group of pilots were passengers going on a training course. In the cockpit was a recently demoted pilot, with the son of the guy who'd demoted him as Captain. Big mystery
 
. .
He is not Indian for sure. But he's adds nothing of value to any discussion. I always wondered why would a greek join a pakistan forum? Do you think any asian ever cared about greece or related to greece in anyway? he just hates all asians (Indian, Chinese) equally. coming from a pointless place with zero relevance in our matters. just ignore him, all noise, no substance.

Chinese have ethno-nationalist view on world and that dictates Hans are perfect people who cannot do anything wrong, therefore suggestion that pilot could have downed the plane on purpose is impossible, and that's that.
 
.
The plane pulled up before the crash, and the pilot was obviously trying to save the plane. And the pilot called the tower for help.


You're obviously mistaken. Now it's up to Boeing to explain to the Chinese.
Maybe you think China grounded the 737-800 or the Chinese market lost trust in Boeing is just a small thing?
Actually, it is you who are mistaken. For each of these events, I have never jumped to any hypothesis let alone conclusion like you guys usually do. I have always said these investigations takes months if not yrs to perform so always advocated patience. So now the recorders' data are finally coming now, given you guys' past, I want to see your 'technical' explanation of this mishap, and am using the word 'technical' broadly. :lol:

Of course it has. By people who are strongly motivated to deny it.
Then what is the point of these investigations if you are going to dismiss anything Boeing said?
 
.
Airplanes cannot fall from the sky through technical failure in the manner shown by the video. Very difficult to understand how any single human being can inflict death and distress on all those innocent people and their families. RIP those so tragically lost
 
.
I believe the plane in China accident is quite new. The engineering design might be proven though.

Remember:


If they ground fleet and crash appears to be intentional, likely it's hardware remote hacking, not a human aboard culprit.

It's dangerous use Western Made hardware to life support devices, they have no remorse in kill civilian people when they need to geopolitical blackmail.

Hardware remote hacking. 😅😅😅😅😅😅👍 Why not Aliens?
 
.
Am going to give everyone a clue about words like 'intentional' or 'deliberate' when it comes to these events. The words 'intentional' or 'deliberate' are NOT restricted to the aircrew. The contexts (plural) of these words have technical aspects and can remove the aircrew of being the root cause while still retain their original meanings.
 
.
Sounds like Boeing is trying to get off the hook for what looks to be a machanical failure. Lots of billions on the line so it’s pretty obvious what the motivation is.

No mechanical failure leads to 90° nosedive. The only possibility would be that both stabilizers fail at exactly same time. Otherwise it would go into a spin.



Only the crew itself can do this 90° nosedive. Its that simple.

The trajectory of the plane did suggest foul play.

Exactly.
 
.
No mechanical failure leads to 90° nosedive. The only possibility would be that both stabilizers fail at exactly same time. Otherwise it would go into a spin.



Only the crew itself can do this 90° nosedive. Its that simple.



Exactly.
Human error would be the cause
 
.
Back
Top Bottom