What's new

China developing Naval version JF-17 for aricraft carrier?

Status
Not open for further replies.

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Found this interesting article publish in 2007, building case for induction of Navel version of JF17,just to share with you. And exploring the prospects of induction of aircraft carrier in PN in coming years. If China fully developed this Navel version

FC—1 will be the use of domestic attack aircraft carrier battle engine, improving and upgrading the technology used F10, maiden flight is expected in 2012 and the development of carrier-coach. 。Su-33 will be formed with the FTC-1 level of match, the Chinese carrier equipment.

——Why not say, the F10 is a game --

  Xiaolong aircraft is outstanding mobility, greater range, and combat radius of empty time, Short landing good character and a strong ability to carry weapons, and medium - and low-altitude high subsonic outstanding mobile combat capability. a better interception and ground attack capability on the all-weather, single, single, a new generation of light fighter. Middle aspect ratio wing of the plane while the normal distribution, a total of seven wings the whole plane, hoisting a variety of air-to-air, air weapons can store three drop tank, the ability to store more than 3,600 kilograms. The aircraft's aerodynamic shape and use of advanced high-thrust. The turbofan engine with low fuel consumption and telex advanced digital flight control system, integrated avionics and weapons systems. from the missile firing is, the ability to attack multiple targets over the horizon, with a variety of advanced precision navigation. battlefield situation awareness, target detection and identification, electronic warfare and attack operations functions.

  As a result of the contemporary advanced design and manufacturing technology, Xiaolong third-generation fighter aircraft and overall operational efficiency, with today's advanced fighters contend, Light is also small, low-cost characteristics, and meet the requirements of modern warfare requirements and the needs of the market for military aircraft.

  枭Xiaolong FC is to meet the demands of modern warfare and military aircraft market demand, It features a host of advanced modern technologies and the development of new advanced fighter planes. Can be used to gradually replace the current UM in 1976, F-5, MIRAGE- IIIs F-7. The series-5 and F-16 aircraft to meet the needs of developing countries to update the middle and lower ends of fighters. using a modern aircraft design philosophy is :

   Advanced configuration

  Middle normal aspect ratio wing aircraft type configuration of the border, both sides "oblique" inlet. aircraft will be able to maintain good at high angle of attack into the air. Can accommodate large-caliber nose radar antenna. Wing, horizontal tail, front-sweep Yields were 42 ° composite wing bending and torsion, sweep angle of 75 ° edge of the large extended to the tail of the fuselage. LEADING-wide wingspan and a wing edge flap; Moving differential horizontal tail axis, single-Yields, the two pelvic fins. Airframe modification using supersonic legal area, a mixed beam with a half-nut body structure. Advanced aerodynamic characteristics of the layout of the aircraft has better lift, the lift-to-drag ratio and the greater good of HAOA.

  · High-performance engine system

  Thrust RD-93 equipped with a large, low fuel consumption of high thrust-weight ratio turbofan engines. Engine thrust Biomass Afterburner kilograms combat thrust 5O4O kilograms, and effectively raise the aircraft's rate of climb, mobility and endurance time.

   Excellent short take-off and landing characteristics of the flight and combat radius larger

  Former three-point landing gear, the overall structure of tanks, aircraft fuel 227O kg. 。Can be decorated with three drop tank.

  ·Ejection advanced sound system and the cockpit vision
  Ejection System detonating cord to wear micro covered by the canopy broken cable systems and micro-explosion "zero-zero" Ejection Seat components. Greatly improved the survival rate in the low negative attitude of the rescue. Domestic cabin equipped with the most advanced TY5B which allocated rocket ejection seat. Loading can MK-16K British company Martin Baker ejection seat, to provide users with a variety of options.

  The overall shape of stalls, blister-covered cabin, in front of more than 13 ° angle under the level reached 330 ° field of vision. 。Provided a good vision for pilots.

  · Advanced flight control and integrated avionics and weapons systems

  Low-cost, advanced more than 40 degrees vertically full authority digital analogue backup redundancy plus two-wire control system, two horizontal mechanically controlled and limited authority digital control stability augmentation system redundancy. Aircraft with low cost and high performance, excellent quality and variety of flying automatic driving function, adaptability, scalability strong.

   Two management tasks to computers and MIL-STD-1553B aircraft weapons and STD Bus Bus -1760C weapons and weapons for the integrated navigation system with target search, detection and tracking. Store management, and put in weapons, navigation, communications and IFF, data link communications, missile approach warning. integrated electronic warfare, mission planning and record parameters such as functional, modern cockpit layout. Cabin contain a wide field of view HUD, and three multi-function color LCD display, hands shift control system with a good man-machine interface. Cockpit lighting to meet the requirements of night flights.

  Multifunction Fire Control Radar with pulsed Doppler velocity search, while track-while-scan while searching edges range, single-target tracking, multi-target tracking and aerial combat capabilities such as air-to-air mode, and has real beam mapping and expanded beam sharpening, ranging space. surface target detection and tracking of air-to-ground mode.

  ·Powerful weapons distribution, precision weapons and put ground attack capability.

  Equipped with a 23 mm guns. Winglet whole plane, including a total of seven bombs wings, flags multiple air-to-air, air-to-ground weapons. Store total capacity of 3,600 kg. According to different tasks can be carried out missile wings close grapple over the horizon of medium-range missiles, anti-ship missiles, anti-radiation missiles. 250 kg, 500 kg, 100 kg conventional bombs and laser-guided bombs; rockets of various calibers; electronic warfare device; laser device and infrared night vision device so.

  ·。Excellent operational performance, all-weather, over-the-horizon capability.

  Prominent low-altitude aircraft, high subsonic mobile combat capability. good interception and ground attack, as well as over-the-horizon capability. 。Air-to-air combat based, with a strong air-to-ground combat capability. Have the range, and combat radius of empty time. Able to weather the implementation of air operations, air intercept and escort combatants, battlefield interdiction and close support. to the sea to support and precision attack missions. Also for reconnaissance, jamming, coaches and other special aircraft.
Source:war-china
 
.
why would china develop a navalised JF-17 when it has no plans to induct this a/c in the PLAAF and PN has no plans (or budget) for a aircraft-carrier?
 
.
why would china develop a navalised JF-17 when it has no plans to induct this a/c in the PLAAF and PN has no plans (or budget) for a aircraft-carrier?

JF-17 can play a light combat role in PLAN. you dont necessarily need a air craft carrier to operate navalized version.. if all this is true then its a great news for PN.. even with the induction of JF-17 PN will still lack a true dedicated maritime multi role fighter..
 
.
JF-17 can play a light combat role in PLAN. you dont necessarily need a air craft carrier to operate navalized version.. if all this is true then its a great news for PN.. even with the induction of JF-17 PN will still lack a true dedicated maritime multi role fighter..

this is speculative at best!
 
.
why would china develop a navalised JF-17 when it has no plans to induct this a/c in the PLAAF and PN has no plans (or budget) for a aircraft-carrier?

I think China might buy JF-17 to replace F-7's.

Bcoz it doesn't make sense to replace all old F7's with J-10.

Jf-17 provides more cost effective solution.
 
.
I think China might buy JF-17 to replace F-7's.

Bcoz it doesn't make sense to replace all old F7's with J-10.

Jf-17 provides more cost effective solution.

They will buy JF17 if it fits with in their doctrine of defence or offence. Perhaps the next tranche might impress them more. However it must be said that with J10 developing at the pace at which it is and with the boom in Chinese economy, Thunder seems a less likely buy for the chinese.
Araz
 
.
why would china develop a navalised JF-17 when it has no plans to induct this a/c in the PLAAF and PN has no plans (or budget) for a aircraft-carrier?

Yar its not that PN doesn't have money, A Aircraft carrier is no use to us.
 
. .
this type seems to be a choice.. refurbished and good to go when Spain decides to retire and that PN decides to have AC capability...
bdd0914dd7ba256470c2c616edd78055.jpg

Roles: Air defense missions, Surface defence missions, Anti-submarine warfare and coastal defence..
type of AC: JF-17 STOVL "if ever ture", Z-9D, and reconnance choppers..
Cost: around 400 million dollars.

Air craft carrier in PN will have its own role.. where as be it fixed wing or rotary, surface fleet or anything are operated only and only from one sole base karachi.. and karachi needs a back up support and even one AC wont be enough.. IN will have formidable force and just Mirage-IV and III replaced by JF-17 wont do good aganist (super hornets- most likely), MKI, and Mig-29K....i seriously dough that JF-17 will be able to do anything aganist that force.. PN needs to build up a modern fixed wing MRCA fleet...
 
.
Air craft carrier in PN will have its own role.. where as be it fixed wing or rotary, surface fleet or anything are operated only and only from one sole base karachi.. and karachi needs a back up support and even one AC wont be enough.. IN will have formidable force and just Mirage-IV and III replaced by JF-17 wont do good aganist (super hornets- most likely), MKI, and Mig-29K....i seriously dough that JF-17 will be able to do anything aganist that force.. PN needs to build up a modern fixed wing MRCA fleet...

PN is mainly for defensive role, not offensive! we don't have enough money nor we are planning to reach south Africa. with development of Babur and raad cruise missile, our adversary is in our range so PN better need to use its money on stealth subs like u-214/212 having cruise missile launching platforms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neo
.
this type seems to be a choice.. refurbished and good to go when Spain decides to retire and that PN decides to have AC capability...
bdd0914dd7ba256470c2c616edd78055.jpg

Roles: Air defense missions, Surface defence missions, Anti-submarine warfare and coastal defence..
type of AC: JF-17 STOVL "if ever ture", Z-9D, and reconnance choppers..
Cost: around 400 million dollars.

Air craft carrier in PN will have its own role.. where as be it fixed wing or rotary, surface fleet or anything are operated only and only from one sole base karachi.. and karachi needs a back up support and even one AC wont be enough.. IN will have formidable force and just Mirage-IV and III replaced by JF-17 wont do good aganist (super hornets- most likely), MKI, and Mig-29K....i seriously dough that JF-17 will be able to do anything aganist that force.. PN needs to build up a modern fixed wing MRCA fleet...

23rd march - can u calculate the cost of the support flotilla required to defend this AC! destroyers, frigates, minesweepers, subs etc. like Sir MuradK said PN dosnt have any use for such.
 
.
PN is mainly for defensive role, not offensive! we don't have enough money nor we are planning to reach south Africa. with development of Babur and raad cruise missile, our adversary is in our range so PN better need to use its money on stealth subs like u-214/212 having cruise missile launching platforms.

AC does not necessarily mean it has to be used for offensive role and PN is not buying subs for defensive role.. but i dont know where you got the logic from my post that PN is planning to reach South africa? please keep your sarcastic remarks to yourself.. i am just showing my concern that what answer does PN have when IN unleash super hornest MKI and mig-29K fire balls rain upon PN?? air support for army is just as important as it is for Navy..
at the end of the day... god have mercy on PN....
 
.
23rd march - can u calculate the cost of the support flotilla required to defend this AC! destroyers, frigates, minesweepers, subs etc.

are you telling me that current and future acquisition of PN surface fleet wont be able to support one single AC? their is no point of taking AC up indian coast as it will be suicidal for AC and supporting fleet...
 
.
I dont understand the intended purpose or role that it will serve with the PN unless ofcourse we are thinking about a blue water navy. IMO i think we should thank god if at this stage we are able to modernize our surface combatants ships, frigates, Subs which should be done on urgent bases considering the fact that we still operate ex amazon class frigates and navy is responsible to protect your sea lanes in case of a conflict. On a side note if we are willing to spend this much money on an AC, it would be better if we induct a nuclear sub instead.
 
.
AC does not necessarily mean it has to be used for offensive role and PN is not buying subs for defensive role.. but i dont know where you got the logic from my post that PN is planning to reach South africa? please keep your sarcastic remarks to yourself.. i am just showing my concern that what answer does PN have when IN unleash super hornest MKI and mig-29K fire balls rain upon PN?? air support for army is just as important as it is for Navy..
at the end of the day... god have mercy on PN....

our air force will be having enough capability to defend PN we cannot afford arm race with India that if IN have Aircraft carrier so we should. both IN and PN have different requirements so tell me dear why buy an aircraft carrier when our adversary is right in front of us?? also, I suggested the subs because they are more effective and feasible right now buying an aircraft carrier instead of modern subs is nothing but just a stupidity and waste of money!
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom