China demands ‘its share’ of Arunachal Pradesh

[Kazhugu]

China is growing much stronger than India. Wouldn't you agree?

and we are going stronger too....

usa is much stronger than china...(dont cry a river , thats true) but still it sdoesnt do anything..why ? because china can make the cost of victory so steep that the victory will actually be a loss...same is the case with china-india...we can and we will make your victory so costly that you wish you didnt want that victory...

 

[Kazhugu]

indians should ask themselves why: why china could settle border issues with everyone else except india. you got backstabbed by indians once, you just get cautious in the future

because we are too big and powerful to be bullied by you in "settling" up the issue...like u did with tajikistan or kyrgyztan....

 

[iajj]

because we are too big and powerful to be bullied by you in "settling" up the issue...like u did with tajikistan or kyrgyztan....

haha, this is total bs: china settled its land border issues with russia, and the fear of an invasion of russian armor was traditionally the paramount concern of chinese foreign policy. the truth is china settled its border issues with neighbors big and small, and india made itself the exception because of the history of treachery and double-dealing of its demagogic political class and cluelessness and ignorance of a fanatic demos that was raised by the political class like cattle.

 

[EastWest]

haha, this is total bs: china settled its land border issues with russia, and the fear of an invasion of russian armor was traditionally the paramount concern of chinese foreign policy. the truth is china settled its border issues with neighbors big and small, and india made itself the exception because of the history of treachery and double-dealing of its demagogic political class and cluelessness and ignorance of a fanatic demos that was raised by the political class like cattle.

China is an arrogant bully which brain washes its people and these brain washed people do nothing but cr@p like ur post..

Tell me what about ur issues with Japan, phillipines and vietnam and what not?

u may have settled ur dispute with Russia..but does not mean that Russians trust China..Because China is known to be a back stabber and will attack suddenly and claim some obscure part of history to justify its actions...

 

[newdelhinsa]

They wouldn't eat rice for next decade after trying to claim Arunachal Pardesh by force. No tax on Chinese ranting, they can do it longer they want. yawwwwwaaannnnnn

 

[below_freezing]

China is an arrogant bully which brain washes its people and these brain washed people do nothing but cr@p like ur post..

Tell me what about ur issues with Japan, phillipines and vietnam and what not?

u may have settled ur dispute with Russia..but does not mean that Russians trust China..Because China is known to be a back stabber and will attack suddenly and claim some obscure part of history to justify its actions...

EEZ disputes, not international border.

Russia and China are strategic partners, but China has already surpassed Russia in many fields and is gaining on the fields that we have not surpassed them in. There is zero chance of conflict between Russia and China.

We don't attack suddenly, we will tell you we're going to attack, every time people think its a joke, and then they end up dead.

 

[Yeti]

EEZ disputes, not international border.

Russia and China are strategic partners, but China has already surpassed Russia in many fields and is gaining on the fields that we have not surpassed them in. There is zero chance of conflict between Russia and China.

We don't attack suddenly, we will tell you we're going to attack, every time people think its a joke, and then they end up dead.

This time we are ready we have placed Sukhoi's there alongside the Brahmos missile and with the most advanced AWACS platform which at one point China wanted.

 

[NirmalKrish]

EEZ disputes, not international border.

Russia and China are strategic partners, but China has already surpassed Russia in many fields and is gaining on the fields that we have not surpassed them in. There is zero chance of conflict between Russia and China.

We don't attack suddenly, we will tell you we're going to attack, every time people think its a joke, and then they end up dead.

so does your bull cr ap brainfarts... waiting ZzzzzZzz tell me when you do, so we can give it back tenfolds "martbo ami"

 

[Yeti]

IAF Inducts New Sukhoi Squadron In Chabua | AVIATION WEEK

 

[navtrek]

China demands

DHARAMSHALA, January 29: An exclusive report by a British daily has revealed that the latest round of border talks between India and China, held mid-January, ended in a deadlock after Beijing insisted it would settle for nothing less that “its share” of Arunachal Pradesh.

The 15th round of Sino-Indian special representative talks held in New Delhi had concluded on January 17 with the two Asia giants claiming to have made 'substantial progress' during the two-day meeting.

However, the dailymail.co.uk in a report dated January 28, said that behind the façade of bonhomie, lied bitter, unsolved contentions.

Citing “highly placed” sources privy to the discussions between the two special interlocutors - National Security Adviser Shiv Shankar Menon and his Chinese counterpart, state councillor Dai Bingguoa – the daily reported things went off track after Beijing insisted that India should first discuss the eastern boundary in Arunachal Pradesh.

“The hosts were surprised when Dai, couching his query in diplomatic niceties, asked Menon how much territory New Delhi would part with,” the daily quoted sources as saying.

Menon, who has formerly served as envoy to Beijing, reportedly argued that under article 3 of the guiding principles of the Sino-Indian boundary discussions, both sides should make meaningful and mutually acceptable adjustments to their respective positions on the boundary question, so as to arrive at a package settlement to the boundary question. The keywords in the mentioned principle being “a package settlement” referring to boundary settlements in all the three sectors – eastern, western, and middle border regions.

India and China occupied Tibet share a 3488 km long disputed border which was the cause of a short but bloody war in 1962.

While China claims the whole of the eastern Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh as its territory, India wants back a large area of land from the northern Aksai Chin area that China occupied after the war.

China’s insistence on taking “its share” of Arunachal Pradesh is also seen as a deviation from a previously agreed principle in 2005, when both sides had decided not to disturb settled population.

“But Beijing simply stuck to its guns and told India to first put on the table its proposal for the division of Arunachal Pradesh, specifying the proportion of territory swap,” the report cited sources as saying.

The 15th round of special border talks was scheduled in November last but had to be cancelled after China demanded India scrap an international religious gathering where the Tibetan spiritual leader His Holiness the Dalai Lama was to give a valedictory speech.

Why cant we accept the LAC as the permanent border ? and just resolve the issue. Arunachal Pradesh can be taken only by war.
I dont see any public support for an agreement to share Arunachal Pradesh untill China agrees to give back Aksai chin which i dont think they will.

Bottom line lets just accept the LAC as the permanent border. Chapter close.

 

[Kazhugu]

haha, this is total bs: china settled its land border issues with russia, and the fear of an invasion of russian armor was traditionally the paramount concern of chinese foreign policy. the truth is china settled its border issues with neighbors big and small, and india made itself the exception because of the history of treachery and double-dealing of its demagogic political class and cluelessness and ignorance of a fanatic demos that was raised by the political class like cattle.

lol you settled the russian border issue because russia can send u into stone age if you try to mess with it....remember how they butchered your troops over the ussuri river dispute..?

chinese either settle up when they are in a position of weakness or make the other settle forcefully if they are in a position of strength..but in india's case it is essentially a draw....so the drama continues...

 

[Vinod2070]

chinese either settle up when they are in a position of weakness or make the other settle forcefully if they are in a position of strength..but in india's case it is essentially a draw....so the drama continues...

Chinese are trying to prolong the issue till the time where they think they will have an unassailable advantage and can grab the land with just threats.

Unfortunately for them, the window is long past. The nukes will rain on Shanghai and Beijing and even Harbin if they force India's hand.

We want to live in peace and China needs to forget its imperial pretensions. Sky is the limit for cooperation and joint growth.

 

[iajj]

lol you settled the russian border issue because russia can send u into stone age if you try to mess with it....remember how they butchered your troops over the ussuri river dispute..?

chinese either settle up when they are in a position of weakness or make the other settle forcefully if they are in a position of strength..but in india's case it is essentially a draw....so the drama continues...

hey idiot, i only cited russia as an example because you said china refused to settle border with india BECAUSE india is big and powerful and refuses to be bullied, and i showed you an example of a military power no doubt many times mightier than india and yet china settles its border dispute with russia. and now you are saying china WILL settle with big, powerful countries because they cannot be bullied? pick a line and stick to it!

 

[iajj]

Chinese are trying to prolong the issue till the time where they think they will have an unassailable advantage and can grab the land with just threats.

Unfortunately for them, the window is long past. The nukes will rain on Shanghai and Beijing and even Harbin if they force India's hand.

We want to live in peace and China needs to forget its imperial pretensions. Sky is the limit for cooperation and joint growth.

and you don't think china enjoyed such unassailable advantage over burma, north korea, vietnam, and the central asian nations when it negotiated border treaties with them? the fact is: china has the modesty and reason to settle land disputes with countries big and small, and the only reason india has made itself an exception in the class of chinese neighbors (and there are many of them - the biggest class in the whole world, in fact) is that india is the least trust-worthy of all and negotation stalled because indian words aren't worth the ink wasted on diplomatic correspondence we sent to delhi.

now: indians may prove their worth to china by settling its border with at least one of its other neighbors. how about starting with pakistan about kashmir?

 

[Vinod2070]

and you don't think china enjoyed such unassailable advantage over burma, north korea, vietnam, and the central asian nations when it negotiated border treaties with them? the fact is: china has the modesty and reason to settle land disputes with countries big and small, and the only reason india has made itself an exception in the class of chinese neighbors (and there are many of them - the biggest class in the whole world, in fact) is that india is the least trust-worthy of all and negotation stalled because indian words aren't worth the ink wasted on diplomatic correspondence we sent to delhi.

now: indians may prove their worth to china by settling its border with at least one of its other neighbors. how about starting with pakistan about kashmir?

We have settled the border with Bangladesh.

Regarding trust, I may retort with how trustworthy even Chinese origin people in Singapore and other places think you mainlanders are. I won't even go there.

Just understand that your grandstanding pretensions are only funny for us. We can either behave as the ancient great civilizations both of us are. Or we both go down if we can't come to terms with reality.