What's new

China circled by chain of US anti-missile systems

It's said that China's military budget will be around 80billion dollars this year, about 15+% increase. Thanks to Indians indeed.

Hey bro, you are wrong, we should thanks to US not india.:lol: India is not worth to be considered as a threat to china.
 
.
The USA does not have to "save itself" from Chinese influence. USA values and principles are best for mankind and will triumph in the end.

you are right but its now or never condition for usa

if they don't act now then it will be too late

what will be Pakistan role as usa spend money on Pakistan and lots of weapons

will Pakistan be a USA Friend or china

usa has to think
 
Last edited:
.
"you are right but its now or never condition for usa"

"if they don't act now then it will be too late"


Uh?? What do you mean "now or never" for USA? "It will be too late", too late for what?

Sir this post doesn't deserve a serious reply.
 
.
Chinese missiles ae the world's best. All products in the world are made by chinese. US will not dare to lift a finger against china.

We will take back hongkong and taiwan by force.
 
. .
Chinese missiles ae the world's best. All products in the world are made by chinese. US will not dare to lift a finger against china.

We will take back hongkong and taiwan by force.

This thread is getting wackier every minute,you'll take back hong kong by force?? Now which country on this earth do you live in? :hitwall:
 
.
This thread is getting wackier every minute,you'll take back hong kong by force?? Now which country on this earth do you live in? :hitwall:

Leave this "shchin&isinse" troll alone. It is not from China!

:smokin:

(We have enough trolls without having to worry about this false flag creature)
 
. .
Chinese missiles ae the world's best. All products in the world are made by chinese. US will not dare to lift a finger against china.

We will take back hongkong and taiwan by force.

you mean china is more powerful then usa now

usa has to think
 
.
I seriously suspect this "champion" guy and "shchin&isinse" are the same person. Sir, please stop wasting everyone's time if you don't have anything meaningful (or less outlandish) to contribute.
 
.
We should really take away the flag system. Then, who is biased, who is not, will quickly become apparent.
 
.
That's a different debate mate. The downsides to Deng's legacy have also begun to show. One can't "pragmatize" away every issue of historical, right-vs-wrong proportions ...

And getting "rich" isn't the goal, really (unless the objective is to become Saudi Arabia at any cost - nothing wrong with KSA being wealthy btw).

The objective is, IMO and in lay terms, to become "competent".

There really is more to material things on God's green and dusty earth.

Anyways, I digress again ...

:cheers:

yes!! so true! competence is the goal not getting rich. saudi arabia is the perfect example. they are rich, but get it through selling their country's blood and whoring out their country's land to foreign imperialists.

truthseeker also reveals the true face of americans. the fate of the US(A) will be just like that of the other US(SR). United States of America, 1776-2030 probably. It will collapse under the weight of its own obesity and insane military buildup that is a crime against humanity.
 
.
yes!! so true! competence is the goal not getting rich. saudi arabia is the perfect example. they are rich, but get it through selling their country's blood and whoring out their country's land to foreign imperialists.

truthseeker also reveals the true face of americans. the fate of the US(A) will be just like that of the other US(SR). United States of America, 1776-2030 probably. It will collapse under the weight of its own obesity and insane military buildup that is a crime against humanity.

Agree with your first paragraph. But do keep in mind that the Saudis were "constrained" from birth, too - not to excuse their "wealth/performance" ratio entirely ...

On the second point we differ somewhat. I have been here long enough to be convinced that the TruthSeeker does seem to be interested in seeking the "truth", so-to-speak, most of the time.

There is indeed a limit to America's power - both hard and soft.

But I am one who happens to hold the belief that America's soft power is far more formidable, genuinely attractive in many ways, and beguiling in many others ...

Gravity applies to everyone, and every empire - as you say.
 
. .
Dude do you really think china needs to spend 80 Bn to take care of India :what: why are u mixing up things u guys are spending to be on par with US and suddenly you talk abt India which has nothing to do with it. At-least officially :hitwall:

China will spend less than 1.75% of GDP,it rise only upon the economic development,If there is no war this will always <2% of GDP
 
.
Back
Top Bottom