What's new

China Calls for Linking Chabahar, Gwadar Ports

Iran actually offered Chabahar to China before but we wanted Gwadar instead due to strategic reasons. Linking these two ports would be good, Chabahar does not have the depth nor the capacity for bigger ships.

Use the word natural in between. :)

If you are not aware, we had already dredged around 15 to 16 Meters increasing the depth of Chabahar from its natural depth. If a depth of 23 meters or above is achieved, it will very well become a DEEP SEA port able to handle VLCC. :p:

So doesn't have naturally don't mean, it is never achievable artificially. Understood my friend. LOL :p:
 
.
Its quarter wise result.

Pity you are not one of those 'high iq' chinese. :( ....... I though you would at least pretend to be one.
Is it? All I see is erratic growth rates for India and one guy drawing a straight trend line as projection of future growth. :enjoy:
 
. . .
Both of these ports are going to be a war zone in coming time.
So Iran is going to follow India because India is a supa powa. It never occured to you they were just using you to build free infrastructure? :rofl:

Do you know how close the Iranian relationship is with China?
 
.
So Iran is going to follow India because India is a supa powa. It never occured to you they were just using you to build free infrastructure? :rofl:

Do you know how close the Iranian relationship is with China?

so having close relationship with china means, iran will leave india ?
 
. .
He noted that the Chinese officials have applied for linking the Iranian Chabahar and Pakistani Gwadar ports.

It could be that Chinese have started worrying about their investment in Gwadar Port

Are Chinese preferring a straight route from Balochistan to Iran to China, surpassing the rest of Pakistan.

Why are Pakistanis so elated ? :devil:
 
.
Nope, it means Chabahar and Gwadar won't be a battle field, it will be a joint development area, complementing each other. Iran needs China & Russia more than India.

The same China and Russia, who along with the P-5 were responsible for the long economic sanctions on Iran while very well having the luxury of VETO, right mate ???? :p:
 
.
The same China and Russia, who along with the P-5 were responsible for the long economic sanctions on Iran while very well having the luxury of VETO, right mate ???? :p:

Can you tell me which sanction did China or Russia voted for? China and Russia are one of the only few countries which does business with Iran regardless of any sanctions.
 
.
Do you even know how VETO works?
when sanctions were brought in by USA, all Russia and China had to do was VETO against those sanctions, which they DID NOT do.

Eating too much dog meat and drinking too much Piss Cola is not good for health mate.
Well, I wouldn't want to go into the Indian agora eating habits and what Gandhi did in the morning with his piss. :lol:
Not vetoing does not mean we agree to the sanctions, we could have done it due to political reasons. We actually bypassed the sanctions and continued trading with Iran directly or indirectly. Up until today, the most important relationship Iran has is with China and Russia. India is not even qualified for Rohingya crisis. i know you are trying really hard to be SUPA POWA :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
why are Indians here spitting venom? is gwador in india.

Anyway i posted a day ago that pak need to join up gwador with charbor port to maximize its potential . I should be patted on the back, for this idea and china robbed it.
gold-star.gif
 
. .
India paid for the port but it's in Iran and Iran can link the port to Pakistan.....
Isolation gagaman style
 
.
India paid for the port but it's in Iran and Iran can link the port to Pakistan.....
Isolation gagaman style
Lol, that's what happens when you have a short sighted reactive planning. China developing Gwadar was not just for military purposes. Chabahar has got no commercial potential unless linked to Gwadar. It is the Iranians milking India for free development fund.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom