What's new

China Builds Military Airstrip in Disputed South China Sea

.
I ask you again: where is Peking in WW II ? is there province of Japan ?
Lands are lost and gained. It's a normal thing during the war. Soviet Union once lost vast land to Germany in WW2. As long as the war has not ended, you can not draw a conclusion so fast.
 
. .
Lands are lost and gained. It's a normal thing during the war. Soviet Union once lost vast land to Germany in WW2. As long as the war has not ended, you can not draw a conclusion so fast.
Japan occupied Peking for a few years , son! But Chinese created Hanoi and governed Viets for hundreds of years. Do you know the difference?

all invasion of aggressors is illegal, it should been lasted long time or short time.

Hanoi is built by Vietnamese money and manpower. we taken back our land and properties what belong to us.
 
Last edited:
.
Ming invaded in to Vietnam temporally, like Mongolian, Japanese invaded in to China, such ocoupation with force is illegal.

China can not swallow Islands and reefs of Vietnam.

You are Man Chu, you invaded in to China, then you lost your land, It was big mistake.
so are you saying vietnam invaded champa (today's south vietnam) is illegal? so why dont you vietnam return land to those people? vietnam does not own those reefs, so stop claiming fasely

all invasion of aggressors is illegal, it should been lasted long time or short time.

Hanoi is built by Vietnamese money and manpower. we taken back our land and properties what belong to us.
no, hanoi was built by chinese ,when they ruled today's northern vietnam,

My answer is deleted.

I ask you again: where is Peking in WW II ? is there province of Japan ?
where is peking? well, honei was definitly a province of france even before ww2
 
Last edited:
.
here is land and sea of China in your map. chinese aggressors go home.

169681_eefea719b37dba998cdec1e208d7973d.jpg
no, this is just a inland map of china, thats why they called " direct rule 直属 which means direct ruling eighteen proninve, it does not include china's sea territory, also this map is fake, made by vietnamese, they use romatic letters in the map, which chinese dont use, i guess vietnamese are very fool
 
.
Lands are lost and gained. It's a normal thing during the war. Soviet Union once lost vast land to Germany in WW2. As long as the war has not ended, you can not draw a conclusion so fast.
Japan occupied Peking for a few years , son! But Chinese created Hanoi and governed Viets for hundreds of years. Do you know the difference?
this viet boy is funny, during ww2, all of vietnam was occupied by japan, tens of millions of vietnamese died , after japan surrendered , french took back vietnam , " a pronive of fance", also, it was chinese army who entered hoinei and liberated vietnamese from japan occupation
 
Last edited:
.

so are you saying vietnam invaded champa (today's south vietnam) is illegal? so why dont you vietnam return land to those people? vietnam does not own those reefs, so stop claiming fasely

Read again my post. Manchurian ruled China, they lost their Land to Han Chinese. Champa attacked Vietnam to annex us to them, they lost their land to us.

no, hanoi was built by chinese ,when they ruled today's northern vietnam,

no. Hanoi was built by vietnamese manpower.

where is peking? well, honei was definitly a province of france even before ww2

occupation of foreign invaders is illegal.

no, this is just a inland map of china, thats why they called " direct rule 直属 which means direct ruling eighteen proninve, it does not include china's sea territory, also this map is fake, made by vietnamese, they use romatic letters in the map, which chinese dont use, i guess vietnamese are very fool

The map is printed by China.
 
.

Read again my post. Manchurian ruled China, they lost their Land to Han Chinese. Champa attacked Vietnam to annex us to them, they lost their land to us.

-----------------------------
no, its no such thing, the initial tangus tribes of manchurians were from originally from Siberia of russia, they moved to korea first and then moved to Chinese ming, they never got any land in today's china, let alone lost any land to china, when manchus rose up against ming goverment ,their identities are chinese nationasl, even their leader nuerhachi was a army officer of chinese ming army, also, manchurian are made up mostly by han chinese by percentage in the eight banners system, manchu by definition is not a single nationality or ethinic group , they are big congregation of many different nationality and ethinic groups ,made up with mostly han chinese, mongols, tugus and koreans, the manchus by blood are mostly han chinese, the two famous qing emporer kangxi and qianlong and also jiaqing are all han chinese, there is no such thing as who lost whose land to whom, you need to learn chinese history first before you talk nonsense.

also for champa, again, there are no such thing, vietnam has been most agressive country in south east asian history, you always invade champa, lao and combodia, thats why champa always asked china to help them with fighting vietnamese invasion, in history, both vitnam and champa was vessel country of china , china stopped many times when vietnam invaded champa in history , in 19th century, vietnam invaded champa and massacred almost all its residents and swallowed it, ,again, by saying this, even on the other hand, no matter who is invader, you dont have right to anex its land, on your funny logic, you vietnam invaded combodia, champa, lao for thousands of times so you vietnam should be part of them today?? ridiculous, you are making no sense.

no. Hanoi was built by vietnamese manpower.


-------------------------
yes, hanoi was built by chinese, almost everything in ancient vietnam was built by chinese, simply because they were ruling your vietnam, your first city, first house, first everything....... when chinese brought advanced civilization and technology to you primitive viet tribes 2000 years ago, even you vietnamese's first lanuaages are Chinese, let alone other things, all got from your chinese governors



yes, hanoi was built by chinese, almost everything in ancient vietnam was built by chinese, simply because they were ruling your vietnam, your first city, first house, first everything....... when chinese brought advanced civilization and technology to you primitive viet tribes 2000 years ago, even you vietnamese's first lanuaages are Chinese, let alone other things, all got from your chinese governors
 
Last edited:
.
occupation of foreign invaders is illegal.

yeah, it is illegall, so you vietnam have to return land back to champa ,and real vietnam only covers today's north vietnam, and also return land back to lao, combodia you stole from them, especially Phu quoc island close to combodian coast, you stole this island from combodia and have to return to them
 
. .
In Tang Dynasty, "Vietnam" was a provincial state of China. We don't need any "nine-dash" lines, fool!

This trick can't prove that Paracel and spartly belong to China, also like Pham Van Dong's letter ... or stupied more like SCS belong to China because it was name "South China Sea".

Propaganda trick from PRC always very weak: mix and twist about EEZ and 9-10-11-dash-line and disputed area and non-disputed areas. Reef, shoal and Islands ... and many thing more.

yeah, it is illegall, so you vietnam have to return land back to champa ,and real vietnam only covers today's north vietnam, and also return land back to lao, combodia you stole from them, especially Phu quoc island close to combodian coast, you stole this island from combodia and have to return to them
So what will you do with Tibet and Uyghur, then !? Manchuria !?
 
.
Until now, nobody, even Chinese scholar can explain What did Chinese used to base on when they draw 11-dash-line, and became 9-dash-line, and now become 10-dash-line which has not coordinates, longitude ... or anything to identified its area or position.

Any argument is useless if you can't explain what's exactly those maps and your base to claim on SCS !
 
.
This trick can't prove that Paracel and spartly belong to China, also like Pham Van Dong's letter ... or stupied more like SCS belong to China because it was name "South China Sea".

Propaganda trick from PRC always very weak: mix and twist about EEZ and 9-10-11-dash-line and disputed area and non-disputed areas. Reef, shoal and Islands ... and many thing more.


So what will you do with Tibet and Uyghur, then !? Manchuria !?
those are all part of ancient china, china ruled xingjiang and manchuria since 2000 years ago,meanwhile your tiny vietnam did not exsit, on the other hand, you stole champa and lots of land of cambodia , lao just 100 years ago, so return it
 
.
Japan occupied Peking for a few years , son! But Chinese created Hanoi and governed Viets for hundreds of years. Do you know the difference?

not hundreds, but thousands - I just checked Han Dynasty map.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom