What's new

China attacks Japan ship near Diaoyutai again!

Status
Not open for further replies.
How do you colonize an inhabitable island? Did Japanese ever settle on it?

Talking about history, before 1900, even in Japanese document they use Chinese name translation "Uotsuri" which means angling(Chinese diaoyu). The current name used by Japan is actually adopted after English Navy's "Pinnable island" since 1900. Where's the Japanese name in your so called "real history"?

Of course, your government wouldn't want you to read western, japanese, etc. literature/history not unless the Chinese ones. Your government did a good job by manipulating you to believe what they want you to believe. So you would reinforce your government when your government wants to go to war on other nations to achieve their goals. But the ones dying is you and your gov still sit high and live the life of free. LOL

---------- Post added at 07:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:12 AM ----------

Do you have any facts to support your fantasy? If not, you are promoting a smear campaign against another country under the protection of a key board. You are exposing yourself to ridicule.

Yeah, go read up on the internet wikki, google, etc, plenty of sources. That's your fact to explore the world. If you have the patient.
 
Of course, your government wouldn't want you to read western, japanese, etc. literature/history not unless the Chinese ones. Your government did a good job by manipulating you to believe what they want you to believe. So you would reinforce your government when your government wants to go to war with other nations to achieve their goals. But the ones dying is you and your gov still sit high and live the life of free. LOL

---------- Post added at 07:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:12 AM ----------




Yeah, go read up on the internet wikki, google, etc, plenty of sources. That's your fact to explore the world. If you have the patient.

I dont care if we learn the real history or not. what I know is that we ruled viets for more than 1000 years. Based on this fact, we can claim vietnam if you can claim south china sea.
 
Japan does not have the sovereignty on Ryukyu Islands, how can they claim diaoyu islands?

huh?? where do you get your facts from?? ... okinawa is part of the Ryukyu Islands.. are you saying they dont have sovereignty over okinawa??? LMAO... go read up on things before you comment please.... dont listen to the stupid rhetoric your government and school propagate to you.. do some research i implore you..
 
huh?? where do you get your facts from?? ... okinawa is part of the Ryukyu Islands.. are you saying they dont have sovereignty over okinawa??? LMAO... go read up on things before you comment please.... dont listen to the stupid rhetoric your government and school propagate to you.. do some research i implore you..

I think you should go and study the history of Ryukyu before you open your big mouth.
 
Of course, your government wouldn't want you to read western, japanese, etc. literature/history not unless the Chinese ones. Your government did a good job by manipulating you to believe what they want you to believe. So you would reinforce your government when your government wants to go to war on other nations to achieve their goals. But the ones dying is you and your gov still sit high and live the life of free. LOL

Don't throw cheap argument, check the English source (wiki will be a good start) and see which part of my statement is not accurate?

Typical strategies of a China basher:
1. You must be wrong since you read CCP propaganda and brainwashed
2. Then when pointed to English sources... Oh Wiki is not accurate, Chinese must be behind it.
3. Only documentations that are against China is accurate! We live in a free world!
 
I dont care if we learn the real history or not. what I know is that we ruled viets for more than 1000 years. Based on this fact, we can claim vietnam if you can claim south china sea.

LOL, please don't repeat yourself, you guys don't even have a history. In fact, you guys don't even believe in history. Sure you influenced the north vietnamese region for 1000 years but the fact is they pushed you out of the country and left you ponders. Until today, you continue to feel resentful that you should have taken it but you failed because we got stronger than you.

Hồng Bàng dynasty prior to 257 BC
Thục dynasty 257–207 BC
Triệu dynasty 207–111 BC
First Chinese domination 111 BC–39 AD
Trưng sisters 40–43
Second Chinese domination 43–544
Early Lý dynasty 544–602
Third Chinese domination 602–905
Autonomy 905–938
Ngô dynasty 939–967
Đinh dynasty 968–980
Early Lê dynasty 980–1009
Lý dynasty 1009–1225
Trần dynasty 1225–1400
Hồ dynasty 1400–1407
Fourth Chinese domination 1407–1427
• Later Trần dynasty 1407–1413
Later Lê dynasty (Early Lê) 1428–1527
Mạc dynasty 1527–1592
Later Lê dynasty (Restored Lê) 1533–1788
• Trịnh Lords 1545–1787
• Nguyễn Lords 1558–1777
Tây Sơn dynasty 1778–1802
Nguyễn dynasty 1802–1945
• French imperialism 1887–1954
Partition 1954–1975
• Democratic Republic (North) 1945–1976
• State of Vietnam (South) 1949–1955
• Republic of Vietnam (South) 1955–1975
Socialist Republic from 1976
 
well hang on.. i just pointed out that your supposed facts were wrong.. YOU said okinawa is not under japanese sovereignty lol... and since okinawa is one of the closest of that island senkaku islands.. doesnt it stand to reason that every island between okinawa and japan mainland (ryukyu Islands) would be under japanese control and sovereignty?? ?

so really.. i just proved you wrong... where are any of your facts to prove me wrong?? it is no i who needs to do research, because everything is well known and can be backed up.. all you need do is search google.... but you cant back up anything that is well known, you can only use words and silly chinese propaganda
 
LOL, please don't repeat yourself, you guys don't even have a history. In fact, you guys don't even believe in history. Sure you influenced the north vietnamese region for 1000 years but the fact is they pushed you out of the country and left you ponders. Until today, you continue to feel resentful that you should have taken it but you failed because we got stronger than you.

Hồng Bàng dynasty prior to 257 BC
Thục dynasty 257–207 BC
Triệu dynasty 207–111 BC
First Chinese domination 111 BC–39 AD
Trưng sisters 40–43
Second Chinese domination 43–544
Early Lý dynasty 544–602
Third Chinese domination 602–905
Autonomy 905–938
Ngô dynasty 939–967
Đinh dynasty 968–980
Early Lê dynasty 980–1009
Lý dynasty 1009–1225
Trần dynasty 1225–1400
Hồ dynasty 1400–1407
Fourth Chinese domination 1407–1427
• Later Trần dynasty 1407–1413
Later Lê dynasty (Early Lê) 1428–1527
Mạc dynasty 1527–1592
Later Lê dynasty (Restored Lê) 1533–1788
• Trịnh Lords 1545–1787
• Nguyễn Lords 1558–1777
Tây Sơn dynasty 1778–1802
Nguyễn dynasty 1802–1945
• French imperialism 1887–1954
Partition 1954–1975
• Democratic Republic (North) 1945–1976
• State of Vietnam (South) 1949–1955
• Republic of Vietnam (South) 1955–1975
Socialist Republic from 1976

I am wondering whether you will have the fifth Chinese domination
 
Don't throw cheap argument, check the English source (wiki will be a good start) and see which part of my statement is not accurate?

Typical strategies of a China basher:
1. You must be wrong since you read CCP propaganda and brainwashed
2. Then when pointed to English sources... Oh Wiki is not accurate, Chinese must be behind it.
3. Only documentations that are against China is accurate! We live in a free world!


you should look up the term manipulator... you would see they do those same things then try to put it on others lol

---------- Post added at 01:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:25 PM ----------

anyway im out of here.. cyas later

and chinese people.. please do some research, you really lose all credibility with uneducated and ill informed opinions
 
[/COLOR]

Yeah, go read up on the internet wikki, google, etc, plenty of sources. That's your fact to explore the world. If you have the patient.


LOL that's a easy way out. I should too learn Vietnamese and look for references from Vietnamese literature. Thank you, I just might.
 
Don't throw cheap argument, check the English source (wiki will be a good start) and see which part of my statement is not accurate?

Typical strategies of a China basher:
1. You must be wrong since you read CCP propaganda and brainwashed
2. Then when pointed to English sources... Oh Wiki is not accurate, Chinese must be behind it.
3. Only documentations that are against China is accurate! We live in a free world!

LOL, looks like you didn't do your homework and brush up on your own history (because you actually don't care about history) and look up on how the world actually view your nation (China). I've got a lot of Chinese friends came from mainland China and they all know the facts and figures about China because that's where they came from. I get the source from them and Wikki is probably more accurate than what is coming out of your mouth right now.
 
LOL that's a easy way out. I should too learn Vietnamese and look for references from Vietnamese literature. Thank you, I just might.

LOL, since you're so skeptical, that's how I deal with skeptical people like you. :enjoy:
 
LOL, looks like you didn't do your homework and brush up on your own history (because you actually don't care about history) and look up on how the world actually view your nation (China). I've got a lot of Chinese friends came from mainland China and they all know the facts and figures about China because that's where they came from. I get the source from them and Wikki is probably more accurate than what is coming out of your mouth right now.

Don't beat the bush around when you are embarrassed, this is my original statement that you said it is Chinese propaganda, again, just tell me, from your "accurate" source, which part of my statement is wrong?

"Talking about history, before 1900, even in Japanese document they use Chinese name translation "Uotsuri" which means angling(Chinese diaoyu). The current name used by Japan is actually adopted after English Navy's "Pinnacle island" since 1900. "
 
Don't beat the bush around when you are embarrassed, this is my original statement that you said it is Chinese propaganda, again, just tell me, from your "accurate" source, which part of my statement is wrong?

LOL, that word you just used "embarrassed" don't apply to me, it must applied to you so don't tell me how you feel about yourself the same way it applied to me. You just don't get it bud. Until you get it, then we shouldn't have a long conversation like this.
 
LOL, that word you just used "embarrassed" don't apply to me, it must applied to you so don't tell me how you feel about yourself the same way it applied to me. You just don't get it bud. Until you get it, then we shouldn't have a long conversation like this.

After several rounds you just keep insisting attacking the person instead of the argument. The only concrete information you contribute to this thread other than name calling is "We are stronger than you", good luck with that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom