huzihaidao12
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 3,043
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
China showed the historical evident but there was the record or notes could not realize the location in fact where is it and names was difference, very nontransparent, there was some where oversea (海外. China is liasing about nature of such historical documents
At beginning of last century, when Vietnam authority protest to Qing dynasty about an accident by Hoang Sa, Canton governor answered that Hoang Sa no belong to China so that they don't have responsive about. It's evident that from long time China didn't control Hoang Sa and TruongSA.
Vietnam Nguyen's Lord and late on Nguyen's Dynastry has been issued official statement to control both Islands.
If you say "vague", to a certain extent, I agree, it is not clear enough as modern, but, I think, to the ancient standard for an area of sovereignty, it is sufficient, first it has a clear statement of a region, the second, there are some islands name, though not all the islands, and, the Qing dynasty, more like a modern record, a very detailed records.
In fact, the first Vietnam's claims in the South China Sea, it is the colonial era, I said, it has the background and reasons, leaving aside for it, but your claim is claiming that the Chinese government to declare to abandon it? No. Your example the total is more like gossip and rumors, no formal and official information.