What's new

Chief of Army Staff | General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani.

Status
Not open for further replies.
2489.jpg

Chief of Army Staff, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani offering dua after laying a floral wreath at Yadgar-e-Shuhada at General Headquarters on Saturday. (30-4-2011) - Photo ISPR
 
.
HAHAHAHA.....


Kayani bhai sahab ko neend aa rahi hai aaj kal? Parkhachey Udd gaye defense ke....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
Formal Response to US Raid Was ‘Inadequate’: Kayani
May 10, 2011

ISLAMABAD: Army Chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani has acknowledged that an inadequate formal response to Osama bin Laden’s killing has plunged the nation into despondency and caused widespread dismay, saying elected representatives need to take people into confidence.

However, in a statement issued by the military’s press office on Monday, it was not clear whether the military chief called civilian or military response inadequate.

But in a background briefing recently for a select group of journalists, military authorities reportedly pointed fingers at the civilian administration.

“Public dismay and despondency has also been aggravated due to an insufficient formal response,” said Gen Kayani while addressing officers at Rawalpindi, Kharian and Sialkot garrisons.

“He discussed the one-point agenda of (the) Abbottabad incident,” said a statement issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR).

The army chief said that the Abbottabad incident had been in sharp public focus and incomplete information and lack of technical details had resulted in speculations and misreporting.

“The people of Pakistan need to be taken into confidence through their honourable elected representatives,” he was quoted as saying.

He said he had requested Prime Minister Gilani to convene a joint session of the parliament for a briefing on the Abbottabad operation.

“Articulation of a national response through the parliament, under the circumstances, is the most effective way to let the world know the historic achievements of Pakistan against al Qaeda and its terror affiliates,” the army chief said.

Foreign Office briefing

Meanwhile, the Foreign Office (FO) has painted a grim picture of Pakistan-US relations in the operation’s aftermath, saying “things will never be the same again”.

At a closed-door meeting on Monday, senior foreign ministry officials briefed the parliamentary committee on national security on the circumstances under which Bin Laden was killed and how the country’s civilian and military authorities remained ignorant of his whereabouts and the US raid.

The committee, headed by Senator Raza Rabbani and comprising representatives from all political parties, began discussions in an effort to get down to the bottom of the situation.

The committee decided that senior defence and intelligence officials, including the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency’s head, must be summoned for a briefing scheduled for Wednesday.

Requesting anonymity, a committee member told The Express Tribune that Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir said that the operation has exposed the fragile alliance and has taken mutual mistrust to a new level. Bashir told the panel that Pakistan was not consulted in advance about the operation.

Another committee member said that the foreign ministry was confident that despite hiccups, relations will be back on track given the country’s vital role in a future political dispensation of Afghanistan.

“There was consensus that violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty is not acceptable in any manner whatsoever,” said Senator Professor Khurshid Ahmed who represents Jamaat-i-Islami on the panel.

Rabbani said the circumstances surrounding Bin Laden’s death must be investigated thoroughly and the issue must not be swept under the carpet.

Source: The Express Tribune
 
.
kal k bache ab khud ko scientist samjhte hain.........being a part of army we know what is happening.........if anyone needs info go through my treads i have discussed the abbottobad issue. it was hoax and the time will prove it..............everyone knows it was staged..........now its up to u that u take matter in what sense. ............and those who are speaking against army.......jane first u should doo some research....on defence blog acting like child............mayoosi kufar ha so all who are trying to be demoralize should cool down...........and demoralizing ur self wont heart ur enemy......american came to destroy pak and afgan in 2001 and in 2011 american empire is at last stage of its bruttal life....we won .....we did it before and did it again.........
 
.
It is time for Kiyani to go because he is already on an extension. Useless and lame excuses will not work. There needs to be a detailed review how the hell OBL was living in Pakistan for so many years. It is also mentioned that he had other safe houses, though he may have been an evil genius and a master in hiding but he sure didput our country in an embarassing state in the world.

All his front people, that bought the real estate, private builder, servants to buy groceries, Arab ldy doctor inside the house, utility bills in other names and etc. may be an independent network, but still fingers are pointed at Pakistan. Also there was news that many Afghani Families also live in the area, Pakistan should check the immigration status, finances and family members of all of them.
 
.
kiyani is a legend hats off to general we are with pak army you are the best there will ever be pak army rulez
 
.
Formal Response to US Raid Was ‘Inadequate’: Kayani
May 10, 2011

ISLAMABAD: Army Chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani has acknowledged that an inadequate formal response to Osama bin Laden’s killing has plunged the nation into despondency and caused widespread dismay, saying elected representatives need to take people into confidence.

Source: The Express Tribune


Even though Kiyani is right about it but what I don't get is that; when it comes to taking over a civilian government and completely disregarding the constitution, the Army General assumes a responsibility against his national duty which is to protect our borders terming it the Doctrine of Necessity. When it comes to protecting our borders and doing their duty for which they are paid and on which our 90% budget is spent, then they wait for the orders of the President. Can't perform your duty, blame it on others, is a trick being used by 5-year old kids.
 
. .
Pakistan, China mull mly drills

Published: May 20, 2011

ISLAMABAD - Pakistan and China Thursday discussed modalities of forthcoming Pak-China joint military exercise to be held in Pakistan later this year.

In this connection, a Chinese delegation headed by Major General Zhou Hongtao, Deputy Chief of Staff Xinjiang Military Command, called on Chief of Army Staff, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, at GHQ, Rawalpindi, and discussed modalities of forthcoming Pak-China joint military exercise. Pakistani troops last year participated in a joint military exercise with their Chinese counterparts in China
 
.
Wikileaks: Kayani wanted more drone strikes in Pakistan
Published: May 20, 2011

Newly released Wikileaks cables revealed that the US military’s drone strikes programme within Pakistan had more than just tacit acceptance of the country’s top military brass, despite public posturing to the contrary. The cables state that the country’s military was requesting the US for greater drone back-up for its own military operations as long ago as January 2008.

According to cables , the US account of Kayani’s request for “Predator coverage” does not make clear if mere air surveillance were being requested or missile-armed drones were being sought.

According to the report of the meeting sent back to Washington by Patterson, Admiral Fallon “regretted that he did not have the assets to support this request” but offered trained US Marines (known as JTACs) to coordinate air strikes for Pakistani infantry forces on ground. General Kayani “demurred” on the offer, pointing out that having US soldiers on ground “would not be politically acceptable.”

As reported earlier in The Express Tribune, WikiLeaks cables revealed that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani allowed drone strikes in the tribal areas of Pakistan, saying they would protest the attacks in the National Assembly and then ignore them.

When Interior Minister Rehman Malik advised the US to hold off “alleged Predator attacks until after the Bajaur operation”, Gilani brushed off the remarks saying:

I don’t care if they do it as long as they get the right people. We’ll protest in the National Assembly and then ignore it.

According to a leaked cable published on NDTV, in an earlier meeting on January 9, 2008 with Codel Lieberman, Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Kayani agreed that increased training and exercises with the US would be of great value, but urged that US-Pakistan military engagement remain low-key for domestic political reasons. Lieberman underscored need for Pakistan to hold free, fair elections in February.

They also discussed the need to add a humanitarian aspect to Pakistan’s counterinsurgency strategy. Kayani noted four areas in which the Army was requesting technical assistance.

A cable dated February 19, 2009 sates:

The strikes have put increasing political pressure on the Pakistani government, which has struggled to explain why it is allowing an ally to violate its sovereignty. The GOP so far has denied recent media reports alleging that the U.S. is launching the strikes from bases in Pakistan. Kayani knows full well that the strikes have been precise (creating few civilian casualties) and targeted primarily at foreign fighters in the Waziristans. He will argue, however, that they undermine his campaign plan, which is to keep the Waziristans quiet until the Army is capable of attacking Baitullah Mehsud and other militants entrenched there.

The cable states that Anne Patterson remarks that “Kayani is often direct, frank, and thoughtful. .. is an avid golfer, he is President of the Pakistan Golf Association. He smokes heavily and can be difficult to understand as he tends to mumble.

Wikileaks: Kayani wanted more drone strikes in Pakistan – The Express Tribune
 
.
Army chief wanted more drone support

KARACHI: Secret internal American government cables, accessed by Dawn through WikiLeaks, provide confirmation that the US military’s drone strikes programme within Pakistan had more than just tacit acceptance of the country’s top military brass, despite public posturing to the contrary. In fact, as long ago as January 2008, the country’s military was requesting the US for greater drone back-up for its own military operations.

Previously exposed diplomatic cables have already shown that Pakistan’s civilian leaders are strongly supportive – in private – of the drone strikes on alleged militant targets in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), even as they condemn them for general consumption. But it is not just the civilian leadership that has been following a duplicitous policy on the robotic vehicles.

In a meeting on January 22, 2008 with US CENTCOM Commander Admiral William J. Fallon, Army Chief General Ashfaq Kayani requested the Americans to provide “continuous Predator coverage of the conflict area” in South Waziristan where the army was conducting operations against militants. The request is detailed in a ‘Secret’ cable sent by then US Ambassador Anne Patterson on February 11, 2008. Pakistan’s military has consistently denied any involvement in the covert programme run mainly by the CIA.

The American account of Gen Kayani’s request for “Predator coverage” does not make clear if mere air surveillance were being requested or missile-armed drones were being sought. Theoretically “Predator coverage” could simply mean air surveillance and not necessarily offensive support. However the reaction to the request suggests otherwise. According to the report of the meeting sent back to Washington by Patterson, Admiral Fallon “regretted that he did not have the assets to support this request” but offered trained US Marines (known as JTACs) to coordinate air strikes for Pakistani infantry forces on ground. General Kayani “demurred” on the offer, pointing out that having US soldiers on ground “would not be politically acceptable.”

In another meeting with US Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen over March 3-4, 2008, Kayani was asked for his help “in approving a third Restricted Operating Zone for US aircraft over the FATA.” The request – detailed in a cable sent from the US Embassy Islamabad on March 24 – clearly indicates that two ‘corridors’ for US drones had already been approved earlier.

In secret cable on October 9, 2009 (previously published by WikiLeaks), Ambassador Patterson reports that US military support to the Pakistan Army’s 11th Corps operations in South Waziristan would “be at the division-level and would include a live downlink of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) full motion video.” In fact, in November 2008, Dawn had reported then commander of US forces in Afghanistan, General David McKiernan, telling its reporter that US and Pakistan also share video feeds from Predator drones that carry out attacks. “We have a Predator feed going down to the one border coordination centre at Torkham Gate thats looked at by the Pakistan Military, Afghan Military, and the International Security Assistance Force,” General McKiernan had said.

Sharing of video feeds does not imply operational control by Pakistan’s military, however, and even this sharing may have subsequently been suspended.

Despite the occasionally disastrously misdirected attacks which have fed into the public hue and cry over civilian casualties, there is, in private, seeming general acceptance by the military of the efficacy of drone strikes. In a cable dated February 19, 2009, Ambassador Patterson sends talking points to Washington ahead of a week-long visit to the US by COAS Kayani. Referring to drone strikes, she writes: “Kayani knows full well that the strikes have been precise (creating few civilian casualties) and targeted primarily at foreign fighters in the Waziristans.”

Another previously unpublished cable dated May 26, 2009 details President Zardari’s meeting on May 25 with an American delegation led by Senator Patrick Leahy. “Referring to a recent drone strike in the tribal area that killed 60 militants,” wrote Ambassador Patterson in her report, “Zardari reported that his military aide believed a Pakistani operation to take out this site would have resulted in the deaths of over 60 Pakistani soldiers.”

The general support for drone strikes from both the military and civilian leadership is also evidenced by the continuous demand, documented over numerous cables, from Pakistan Government officials to American interlocutors for drone technology to be placed in Pakistani hands. The issue conveyed to the Americans is not so much that of accuracy as that of managing public perceptions.

In the meeting with Senator Leahy, Zardari is directly quoted telling the US delegation to “give me the drones so my forces can take out the militants.” That way, he explains, “we cannot be criticized by the media or anyone else for actions our Army takes to protect our sovereignty.”

General Kayani also “focused on the need for surveillance assets” in the meeting with Admiral Fallon according to Patterson’s cable. “Kayani said he was not interested in acquiring Predators, but was interested in tactical Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAVs).” Predators are considered ‘theatre-level’ technology able to cover wide regions such as the whole of Afghanistan and Pakistan through remotely stationed operations rooms while ‘tactical’ drones are less wide-ranging and can be operated by forces on the ground.

After the first US drone strike outside the tribal areas, in Bannu on November 19, 2008 which killed four people including an alleged senior Al Qaeda member, Ambassador Patterson had presciently noted in another previously unpublished cable (dated November 24, 2008) the dangers of keeping the Pakistani public misinformed. “As the gap between private GOP acquiescence and public condemnation for US action grows,” she wrote back to Washington, “Pakistani leaders who feel they look increasingly weak to their constituents could begin considering stronger action against the US, even though the response to date has focused largely on ritual denunciation.”

Army chief wanted more drone support | Newspaper | DAWN.COM
 
.
All fake,

This nation needs to understand that USA is using wikikeaks as weapon against different countries, they are leaked for certain gains...
In Pakistan, if you evaluate all news from last 2 years m USA is trying hard to make the Pak Army image on Pak People as a double gamers which is wrong on so many levels..

USA by all means trying hard that people of Pakistan start blaming their army for all bad things in the country and thats what these sort of leaks are for... All sort of wrong information is being transfered like this through controlled media

NO ONE TRUST WIKILEAKS
 
. .
He smokes heavily and can be difficult to understand as he tends to mumble.

:D
Sir Fat....
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom