jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
Go cry me a river. LOL
RIMPAC is intend for two purposes, one for humanitarian ground and the other is to have other navies get extra training with the US navy. When we participated in RIMPAC last year, we only participated on the humanitarian mission. Now for humanitarian purpose, the US reject us is not our lost. In fact, humanitarian ground is always voluntary basis. They invited us to RIMPAC last year with the intention for China to provide more aid in international collaboration. They been begging us to provide more so I don't think we are going to cry with the lost of RIMPAC. LOL
Why would you define "LOST" on either side is beyond me, it's just a training exercise. There are no "LOST" to any party, beside the fuel it take for participating the exercise for those participant.
RIMPAC is not a Chinese Naval Exercise, the RIMPAC will go on with or without the Chinese, and without the Chinese participating, that does not overshadow the exercise one bit, nor would China lose anything whether or not they join that exercise. I mean, it's not like you get pay to do these kind of exercise
This article, as well as the OP response is overhyped and over sensation