By 2020, India will emerge ahead of China on several counts in economy

[My-Analogous]

1. I am not your f**ggin mate

2. China story is over, who said that? you?

3. watch India rise over China? Have you figured out how indoor plumbing works yet?

They don't even know the meaning of mate and talking big

Coz Pakistan is already a signatory of the TIR system. Pakistani's objections can be bypassed through TIR which is more realistic.
The other way is : NSTC
I guess NSTC is already discussed to death on this forum. You can go through the relevant thread for in depth explanation.

So it mean you guys need Pakistan for your future growth or else it will hurt your economy, with current situation and everyone in the world know about rivalry between us and even India don't want to play sport with us. Please explain how can you guys achieve that?

 

[BABA AGHORI]

They don't even know the meaning of mate and talking big


So it mean you guys need Pakistan for your future growth or else it will hurt your economy, with current situation and everyone in the world know about rivalry between us and even India don't want to play sport with us. Please explain how can you guys achieve that?

It is not India, But Pakistan who would be required to explain to International bodies. Pakistan has already signed the dotted line.
We don't need Pakistan for future growth. It is just a pressure making technique, to show that Pakistan did bend down on it's stand and gave the way..
The cost to India to bypass Pakistan is not greater than for Pakistan to block the way.

 

[My-Analogous]

It is not India, But Pakistan who would be required to explain to International bodies. Pakistan has already signed the dotted line.
We don't need Pakistan for future growth. It is just a pressure making technique, to show that Pakistan did bend down on it's stand and gave the way..
The cost to India to bypass Pakistan is not greater than for Pakistan to block the way.

That you think, but world is not that simple and every agreement have lots of "if and but" ways and everyone keep it like that for a reasons

 

[BABA AGHORI]

That you think, but world is not that simple and every agreement have lots of "if and but" ways and everyone keep it like that for a reasons

The world doesn't work on emotions and lame excuses but on the cost... The bottom line is @ what cost.....
cYa

 

[rcrmj]

China story is over mate, now it's time for China to get on the sideline and watch India rise over China.

so u were saying since the day you joined PDF claimed as an Economy student``

I know you are a firm believer of Indian delusion, with your classic Indian traits which consist of a set of qualities (lousy, ignorant, stubborn, inferior complexity and submissive) prevent you from thinking with common sense`````

do you remember those your early posts, "opinions" or "predictions" regarding China and India's economy, technology and sociality on PDF back then? they all look ludicrous now````as none of them has any touch with today's reality

years after so much bragging and hyping of you deluded bunch, India is still a factor driven primitive society with largest starving population, least equal society and awful environment```but we are still on the high road towards the ever pending "collapse"```

but this inherited legacy of clueless bragging goes back to the birthday of the country India in 1947, so the fact is, no matter how Indian brag, India was, is and going to be nobody, it wont become any notable world player in our life time``unless fundamental changes of your people's mindset

 

[dray]

I can understand what you wish, but India is not going to rise over China. Period.

You guys are simply not equipped to understand what you are up against. It is so sad you don't have the concept, what so ever, about your biggest enemy.

We know, we are up against a bunch of historical losers who suddenly made some money by stitching shoes and stuff and now thinks they can own the whole world. And we know how to prick a pin in that balloon and let the hot air pass in a jiffy.

Even in 13 year from now India can't beat China, if the growth rate is 7.4%/year (http://www.hindustantimes.com/busin...0-us-agency/story-wBY2QOQ8YsYcrIK12A4HuK.html), but this year India growth rate is 7.2 (http://indianexpress.com/article/bu...ts-7-2-growth-rate-for-india-in-2017-4689537/).
In 2030
India with average 7.4%/year growth will be $6.84 trillion (current GDP $2 trillion https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/03/worlds-biggest-economies-in-2017/)
China with average 5.3%/year growth will be $19.2 trillion (current GDP $11 trillion)

So please prove your claim that how India can beat China?. In 2030 if India beat Japan, then it will be big achievement.

Economics doesn't work in that way, GDP calculation is not your standard 2 arithmetic, there are many factors like inflation, currency value, that goes in....like if the currency strengthens against the USD, GDP goes up. I have tried teaching Economics and GDP calculations here many times, now I have stopped the futile effort and suggest people to go and study the subject.

1. I am not your f**ggin mate

2. China story is over, who said that? you?

3. watch India rise over China? Have you figured out how indoor plumbing works yet?

1. No you are not, but it would be rather impolite to be truthful here about you.

2. Yes.

3. Nope, that's for you to figure out.

a set of qualities (lousy, ignorant, stubborn, inferior complexity and submissive)

Good to know about you.

years after so much bragging and hyping of you deluded bunch, India is still a factor driven primitive society with largest starving population, least equal society and awful environment```but we are still on the high road towards the ever pending "collapse"```

but this inherited legacy of clueless bragging goes back to the birthday of the country India in 1947, so the fact is, no matter how Indian brag, India was, is and going to be nobody, it wont become any notable world player in our life time``unless fundamental changes of your people's mindset

Good to know about China.

 

[dani191]

dubel digit grow is crazy

 

[N.Siddiqui]

India will be ahead of China in 2024...not a small achievement by India...

India's population to surpass that of China around 2024: UN

• India's population could surpass that of China's around 2024.
• Currently, China with 1.41 bn inhabitants & India with 1.34 bn remain the two most populous countries.
• The report said the current world population of 7.6 billion is expected to reach 8.6 billion in 2030.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...hinas-around-2024-un/articleshow/59257045.cms


https://www.dawn.com/news/1345978/the-wood-in-the-axe

 

[My-Analogous]

The world doesn't work on emotions and lame excuses but on the cost... The bottom line is @ what cost.....
cYa

Read post again to understand what is written. Did you ever did negotiations and how to prepare contracts? I have vast experience in this field and i know the subject very well. The game which i mentioned in earlier post is called clauses.

 

[BABA AGHORI]

Read post again to understand what is written. Did you ever did negotiations and how to prepare contracts? I have vast experience in this field and i know the subject very well. The game which i mentioned in earlier post is called clauses.

Okei dokey --- Pakistan only if and but is with Article 57, para 2 -6, So i don't believe Pakistan can have too many if and but in its kitty.

https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewD...&mtdsg_no=XI-A-16&chapter=11&clang=_en#EndDec

http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/tir/handbook/english/newtirhand/TIR-6Rev9EN_Convention.pdf

 

[My-Analogous]

Okei dokey --- Pakistan only if and but is with Article 57, para 2 -6, So i don't believe Pakistan can have too many if and but in its kitty.

https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewD...&mtdsg_no=XI-A-16&chapter=11&clang=_en#EndDec

http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/tir/handbook/english/newtirhand/TIR-6Rev9EN_Convention.pdf

For your easy reference

TIR
CONVENTION
Settlement of disputes
1.
Any dispute between two or more Contracting Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention shall, so far as possible be settled by negotiation between them or other means of settlement.
2.
Any dispute between two or more Contracting Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention which cannot be settled by the means indicated in paragraph 1 of this Article shall, at the request of one of them,
be referred to an arbitration tribunal composed as follows:
each Party to the dispute shall appoint an arbitrator and these arbitrators shall appoint another arbitrator, who shall be chairman. If, three months after receipt of a request, one of the Parties has failed to appoint an arbitrator or if the arbitrators have failed to elect the chairman, any of the Parties may request the Secretary-General of the
United Nations to appoint an arbitrator or the chairman of the arbitration tribunal.
3.
The decision of the arbitration tribunal established under the provisions of paragraph 2 shall be binding on the Parties to the dispute.
4.
The arbitration tribunal shall determine its own rules of procedure.
5.
Decisions of the arbitration tribunal shall be taken by majority vote.
6.
Any controversy which may arise between the Parties to the dispute as regards the interpretation and execution of
the award may be submitted by any of the Parties for judgment to the arbitration tribunal which made the award

And Pakistan and India Response

Pakistan
Reservation made upon accession:
“The Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan declares, in terms of Article 58 of the Convention, that it would not be bound by the provisions of Article 57, paragraphs 2 to 6 of the Convention.”

India
Reservation:
“The Republic of India declares that it does not consider itself bound by Article 57, paragraphs 2 to 6 of the Customs Convention on the International Transport of Goods under Cover of TIR Carnets (TIR Convention, 1975), concerning the settlement of disputes, arising out of the interpretation or application of its provisions, through arbitration by the arbitration tribunal.”

So now tell me what Pakistan will lose?

 

[rcrmj]

We know, we are up against a bunch of historical losers who suddenly made some money by stitching shoes and stuff and now thinks they can own the whole world. And we know how to prick a pin in that balloon and let the hot air pass in a jiffy.



Economics doesn't work in that way, GDP calculation is not your standard 2 arithmetic, there are many factors like inflation, currency value, that goes in....like if the currency strengthens against the USD, GDP goes up. I have tried teaching Economics and GDP calculations here many times, now I have stopped the futile effort and suggest people to go and study the subject.



1. No you are not, but it would be rather impolite to be truthful here about you.

2. Yes.

3. Nope, that's for you to figure out.



Good to know about you.



Good to know about China.

can you come anything better, a student of "economy major"? ````

 

[Ocean]

I have tried teaching Economics and GDP calculations here many times, now I have stopped the futile effort and suggest people to go and study the subject

i am impressed by the knowledge of economics you have expressed all over the thread. I hope you get employed at indian unis and teach economics there as well. I have never met a smart person as yourself.

The below response is the best and most logical response you have given thus far in this thread. Amazingly backed by economic indicators and future projections.

China story is over mate, now it's time for China to get on the sideline and watch India rise over China.

 

[dray]

i am impressed by the knowledge of economics you have expressed all over the thread. I hope you get employed at indian unis and teach economics there as well. I have never met a smart person as yourself.

The below response is the best and most logical response you have given thus far in this thread. Amazingly backed by economic indicators and future projections.

Good that you understood.

 

[Ocean]

Articles like this serve no purpose other than making India a laughing stock once more.




If you are still thinking that India is behind China 10-17-20 years after all these years being a member of PDF, you have been wasted all these years. What makes China as China today, it is not merely the open-up policy in late 70's, but also the revolution in 50's.

What you are really lagging behind is not GDP numbers, but the social structure that has been in place for thousands of years. You will never see the day that India catches up China in your life time, it doesn't matter how many feel-good articles published in your media or western media.

Sorry, my friend.

some people carry imaginary boyfriend and imaginary girlfriend pillows, these pillows are for loners , i am sure the poor guy too sleeps with an imaginary economy-growth pillow. He is a troll who takes out frustrations surrounding his life on online forums. You considered him worthy of an informative post LMAO

Good that you understood.

Very much.