What's new

Bush: Obama will invade Pakistan

Are these the words and actions of a country that wishes ill for Pakistan?

We shouldnt forget that it was Bush administration who did what you mentioned above, things are getting changed now, democrats are going to be in the power with Obama or Hiliary and IMO pakistan cannot expect anything good out of these two. However as far as invasion of pakistan is concerned or for that matter, attacks on pakistan, What Both obama and hiliary will learn once they enter the white house and get briefed by the CIA that pakistan isnt a park at south hill where you just go and capture it and nor is pakistan iraq. Our forces are very capable and one of the best in the buissness when it comes to defend the mother land and we should have complete faith in the armed forces of pakistan who will defend the country under any circumstances, and this has been made very clear by the GOP. Any attack on pakistani soil will be considered an act of war and pakistan will declare one.
US cannot win war in afghanistan without pakistans support and so will these morons learn once they get into the white house.
 
obama was saying that at the time when protests in pakistan and all this democracy crap were taking place. policies never change because of the president.
 
I dont understand why people pay so much attention to What Bush says about Obama's so called invasion plan.The fact is Pakistan or Iran for that matter is no Iraq.Pakistan has a very friendly relationship with Saudi Arabia/China and is a member of the OIC.Any attack on Pakistan means a WWIII situation which the US will most likely avoid.If Obama indeed becomes president, he CANNOT do so , no matter what his personal intentions are!. Bush invaded Iraq(or has he ??) using sep 11 as an excuse and the results are for all of us to see.The US Congress,Senate and the think tank will not let this happen so all can rest in peace and ignore Obama for the time being!!
 
lolz i am :argh::argh:this same thing on every forum.


***US did 9/11 itself.Which was an inside job(watch loose change 2 edition.as khotay sikay in Urdu by Geo.).just did to rally people behind the war .

I’m not blaming any one for any particular event especially some thing like 9/11 simply because what we know is only the perpetrators who carried out the attack and they were non natives.
There is nothing wrong to blame the perpetrator because he actually carried out the physical crime and is culprit by all earthly laws. Allah will punish the master mind in the end but those who try to take over the job of Allah are clearly lost.

As we know from the popular Musharraf’s classification: (don't remember exact word’s) In every terrorist act there are three guilty parties involved the ‘master mind’ who initiate the act, identify his target and in the end is real beneficiary ‘organizers’ who engineer and coordinate the execution details and ‘perpetrators’ who carry out the tasks, without knowing the real effects of his act.

US was not the beneficiary of 9/11 attacks, infect they are paying heavy price in their war against terrorism.
But to put US astray one need an effective lobby and some ground to persuade.
Normally US President should spend his time in working for his own state affairs but media and lobbies force them to interfere in foreign state’s affairs and at the end US President end up working full time in non US affairs. To astray the people one need full control of media so it’s like hiring US President and fooling the whole nation to promote private business and again which are mainly defence products sales, oil trading and drugs.

When conspiracies are at work than local opportunist look for their private interests but conspirator ignore it all in order to achieve his goal, which somehow further complicate the following investigations and help to confuse the masses, further more.

The war through which US would occupy Oil,Gas,Resources of Iraq,Afghanistan,Centasia,pakistan and then the world.THATS THE SH**T THE NEW WORLD ORDER IS ALL ABOUT

New world order, infact is about modern enslaving, exploiting the cheap labor and week labor laws of various under developed countries. Using foreign resources and polluting foreign lands....

You know what Pakistan’s dilemma is? Let say I suggest all middle-eastern countries adopt a common currency and use that for trade! If this happens this will be bang on target and again Pakistanis are the most trust worthy and able work horse of Arabs, who can make things work. In other words a potential threat for those who have concieved new world disorder.
They use our geographical enimies to keep us occupied.
 
I dont understand why people pay so much attention to What Bush says about Obama's so called invasion plan.The fact is Pakistan or Iran for that matter is no Iraq.Pakistan has a very friendly relationship with Saudi Arabia/China and is a member of the OIC.Any attack on Pakistan means a WWIII situation which the US will most likely avoid.If Obama indeed becomes president, he CANNOT do so , no matter what his personal intentions are!. Bush invaded Iraq(or has he ??) using sep 11 as an excuse and the results are for all of us to see.The US Congress,Senate and the think tank will not let this happen so all can rest in peace and ignore Obama for the time being!!

not really. if USA decides to attack ANY country, that country will be alone in defending themselves. no one will openly support that country for the fear of incurring America's wrath.

Saudi's are on americas leash. they will just sit and watch. they wont even say a word against USA. as for china, china wont risk war with USA, not now when they are too damn busy wiht ehir economy. they wont risk being pulled into a war and losing their economic gains. they might provide covert support like intel or conventional arms. nothing more. china didnt even help pak during kargil, remember?
 
I dont understand why people pay so much attention to What Bush says about Obama's so called invasion plan.The fact is Pakistan or Iran for that matter is no Iraq.Pakistan has a very friendly relationship with Saudi Arabia/China and is a member of the OIC.Any attack on Pakistan means a WWIII situation which the US will most likely avoid.If Obama indeed becomes president, he CANNOT do so , no matter what his personal intentions are!. Bush invaded Iraq(or has he ??) using sep 11 as an excuse and the results are for all of us to see.The US Congress,Senate and the think tank will not let this happen so all can rest in peace and ignore Obama for the time being!!

not really. if USA decides to attack ANY country, that country will be alone in defending themselves. no one will openly support that country for the fear of incurring America's wrath.

Saudi's are on americas leash. they will just sit and watch. they wont even say a word against USA. as for china, china wont risk war with USA, not now when they are too damn busy wiht ehir economy. they wont risk being pulled into a war and losing their economic gains. they might provide covert support like intel or conventional arms. nothing more. china didnt even help pak during kargil, remember?
 
I would really like to see Russia in action then there will be a twist in the game I believe the current attacks on Civil and military locations in Pakistan could be the acts of Northern Alliance on the backing of US, if this is the case then there is a serious need to support Taliban.

One thing is also needed that the word demoralization and surrender should not be there in any PA officer’s mind.:pakistan:
 
I would really like to see Russia in action then there will be a twist in the game I believe the current attacks on Civil and military locations in Pakistan could be the acts of Northern Alliance on the backing of US, if this is the case then there is a serious need to support Taliban.

One thing is also needed that the word demoralization and surrender should not be there in any PA officer’s mind.:pakistan:


First of all I dont see a full scale US invasion.its too infeasible

But I do admit that there could sabotage activities in Baluchistan .

Yes you are right if they create disturbance via Afghanistan then Taliban should be supported
 
not really. if USA decides to attack ANY country, that country will be alone in defending themselves. no one will openly support that country for the fear of incurring America's wrath.

Saudi's are on americas leash. they will just sit and watch. they wont even say a word against USA. as for china, china wont risk war with USA, not now when they are too damn busy wiht ehir economy. they wont risk being pulled into a war and losing their economic gains. they might provide covert support like intel or conventional arms. nothing more. china didnt even help pak during kargil, remember?


Yeah I dont expect China to come with its tanks into Pakistan in case of war.
Saudis too want be too worried.


There could some sort of diplomatic support from Saudis.

And Chinese will help us in acquiring Good defensive capabilities and GOOD DETERRENT.

If we have Good Deterrent its sufficient for our protection.
 
not really. if USA decides to attack ANY country, that country will be alone in defending themselves. no one will openly support that country for the fear of incurring America's wrath.

Saudi's are on americas leash. they will just sit and watch. they wont even say a word against USA. as for china, china wont risk war with USA, not now when they are too damn busy wiht ehir economy. they wont risk being pulled into a war and losing their economic gains. they might provide covert support like intel or conventional arms. nothing more. china didnt even help pak during kargil, remember?

China can squeeze Americas balls easily and destroy it's economy if it attacks Pakistan. Who will America borrow from to fight a war against Pakistan? Definitely not China.

Besides, American troops and influence at China's backdoor will spur China into action. Any invasion of Pakistan by the US will give India a great opportunity, so India will jump in, causing China and Iran to jump in as well, and Russia which is aching for a war by buzzing UK and US ships with it's bombers will also jump in. WWIII will start.

All these are reasons there is no way in hell the US will dare to even send one troop across the Pakistani border without our permission, which they will not be getting under any circumstances.
 
If USA wants Pakistan continue to join Anti-terrorism alliance, please don't want to invade and disintegrate Pakistan.

Unity of Pakistan is beneficial to both USA and China.

Also, USA and China powers existing in Pakistan can counterweigh the extremist powers in Pakistan like Taliban, Al Qaeda and Lal Masjid and local tribal regimes. If USA wants to break the balance in Pakistan, she will receive bad consequence.
 
War on terror is just a Hoax .There is no Terror.

Its just a war for oil,resources and accomplishing strategic goals in Cent asia,Pakistan,Afghanistan,Middle east.


Any full scale invasion of pakistan is a shear madness and is extremely infeasible and catastrophic for US.


How ever as US has come to afghanistan to get the resources of Cent asia.
provide it a trade route via Baluchistan.
Get the resources of Baluchistan.
And deny China of Gwadar port.


It will definitely increase its support for the Baluch separatism and BLA.
They are already supporting that via afghanistan.
our senate has reported the involvment of MI5,RAQ,Mossad and Cia behind BLA insurgency
 
War on terror is just a Hoax .There is no Terror.

Its just a war for oil,resources and accomplishing strategic goals in Cent asia,Pakistan,Afghanistan,Middle east.


Any full scale invasion of pakistan is a shear madness and is extremely infeasible and catastrophic for US.


How ever as US has come to afghanistan to get the resources of Cent asia.
provide it a trade route via Baluchistan. Get the resources of Baluchistan.
And deny China of Gwadar port.


It will definitely increase its support for the Baluch separatism and BLA.
They are already supporting that via afghanistan.
our senate has reported the involvment of MI5,RAQ,Mossad and Cia behind BLA insurgency

NATO attacked Taliban only after the mad hatters refused to hand over OBL. I hope now you are not going to say that US or UK paid OBL to bomb the world trade center ? Please don't confuse the Afghan Campaign ie WOT with Iraq which is definately now war for resources.


Lastly what do you expect your senate to say other than blame MI 5 ? Do you expect them to say that their corrupt and short sighted policies gave birth to the BLA. By the way MI 5 charter does not allow it to operate in foreign countries.

Regards
 
China can squeeze Americas balls easily and destroy it's economy if it attacks Pakistan. Who will America borrow from to fight a war against Pakistan? Definitely not China.
true, america's to bankrupt right not to make any move. besides, pakistan is not iraq, it has one the world's largest populations.
Any invasion of Pakistan by the US will give India a great opportunity, so India will jump in, causing China and Iran to jump in as well,
China and iran won't need to jump in. If hindutva fever becomes worse, and india tries to invade pakistan, they will be nuked.
 
Back
Top Bottom