What's new

'Burma's bin Laden' spearheads 969 campaign urging boycott of Muslims

illusion8

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
12,232
Reaction score
-20
Country
India
Location
India
Wrapped in a saffron robe, Buddhist monk Wirathu insists he is a man of peace. Never mind his nine years in prison for inciting deadly violence against Muslims. Never mind the gruesome photos outside his office of Buddhists allegedly massacred by Muslims. Never mind that the man dubbed "Burma's bin Laden" has emerged as the spiritual leader of a pro-Buddhist fringe movement accused of fuelling a campaign of sectarian violence.

Wirathu insists the world has misunderstood him. "If they knew my true ideas, they would call me saviour," he says.

Wirathu has become the figurehead of a virulent strain of religious nationalism being spread by some of the most venerated members of Myanmese society: Buddhist monks. Their core message is that Buddhists must unite against a growing Muslim threat.

While these monks are a minority, some argue they provide an ideological justification for the religious violence that has ripped through Myanmar over the past year, threatening to destabilise its still-fragile democracy.

A short man, with a quick smile and evident charisma, Wirathu is the public face of a fast-spreading but still small campaign called "969". Each digit enumerates virtues of the Lord Buddha, his teachings and the community of monks.

The campaign urges Buddhists to shop only at Buddhist stores and avoid marrying, hiring or selling homes or land to Muslims. Stickers and signs bearing the 969 emblem have been popping up on shops, taxis, and buses, marking them as Buddhist.

To suggest that Wirathu is the main force behind anti-Muslim propaganda is to overstate his influence and underestimate the level to which the ideas he espouses are dispersed. Countless grassroots movements, some branded as 969 and others not, propagate the ideas of Buddhist supremacy. One Muslim shopkeeper in northern Yangon says his sales have fallen by two-thirds since Buddhists stopped coming to his store.

Followers say 969 is a response to 786, a number long used by Muslims in Myanmar to mark halal restaurants and shops. Some erroneously read into 786 as a secret plan for Muslim world domination in the 21st century. The number is actually derived from a short prayer invoking the name of God.

The 969 campaign began to coalesce as a political movement after religious riots in western Rakhine state last June and October. More than 200 were killed, 70 per cent of them Muslim. Over 125,000 remain homeless.

Around four months after the campaign was born, masked men dressed as monks rampaged through the central town of Meikhtila with swords, burning mosques and Muslim shops. Muslims also killed Buddhists.

The attacks left charred bodies in the streets and around 12,000 people, mostly Muslim, without homes. The government declared a state of emergency as the violence spread to 14 more townships. Over 40 people died.

"We also condemn these acts, 969 doesn't accept terrorism," Wirathu says.

Human rights groups, however, have documented a pattern to the anti-Muslim pogroms of the past year: Words precede the bloodshed. The Burma Campaign UK found anti-Muslim leaflets without the 969 logo that were circulated in Meikhtila before the attacks. The riots radiated to the Bago region, where Buddhists marked their homes and shops with 969 so they would not be harmed, said Tun Kyi, a Muslim activist from Yangon.

"The 969 campaign is more than a boycott. It's clearly becoming a rationale for violence," says Jim Della-Giacoma, South East Asia Project Director for the International Crisis Group.

'Burma's bin Laden' spearheads 969 campaign urging boycott of Muslims | South China Morning Post
 
WOW ! ! ! SERIOUSLY ! ! :woot: :cheesy:

969 sign hmmm... let me see...


SE666.jpg


UUUUUUOOOOPPPPPPPSSSSSSS...
 
Why are Buddhist monks attacking Muslims?

Of all the moral precepts instilled in Buddhist monks the promise not to kill comes first, and the principle of non-violence is arguably more central to Buddhism than any other major religion. So why have monks been using hate speech against Muslims and joining mobs that have left dozens dead?

This is happening in two countries separated by well over 1,000 miles of Indian Ocean - Burma and Sri Lanka. It is puzzling because neither country is facing an Islamist militant threat. Muslims in both places are a generally peaceable and small minority.

In Sri Lanka, the issue of halal slaughter has been a flashpoint. Led by monks, members of the Bodu Bala Sena - the Buddhist Brigade - hold rallies, call for direct action and the boycotting of Muslim businesses, and rail against the size of Muslim families.

While no Muslims have been killed in Sri Lanka, the Burmese situation is far more serious. Here the antagonism is spearheaded by the 969 group, led by a monk, Ashin Wirathu, who was jailed in 2003 for inciting religious hatred. Released in 2012, he has referred to himself bizarrely as "the Burmese Bin Laden".March saw an outbreak of mob violence directed against Muslims in the town of Meiktila, in central Burma, which left at least 40 dead.

Tellingly, the violence began in a gold shop. The movements in both countries exploit a sense of economic grievance - a religious minority is used as the scapegoat for the frustrated aspirations of the majority.

On Tuesday, Buddhist mobs attacked mosques and burned more than 70 homes in Oakkan, north of Rangoon, after a Muslim girl on a bicycle collided with a monk. One person died and nine were injured.

But aren't Buddhist monks meant to be the good guys of religion?

Aggressive thoughts are inimical to all Buddhist teachings. Buddhism even comes equipped with a practical way to eliminate them. Through meditation the distinction between your feelings and those of others should begin to dissolve, while your compassion for all living things grows.

Of course, there is a strong strain of pacifism in Christian teachings too: "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you," were the words of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount.

But however any religion starts out, sooner or later it enters into a Faustian pact with state power. Buddhist monks looked to kings, the ultimate wielders of violence, for the support, patronage and order that only they could provide. Kings looked to monks to provide the popular legitimacy that only such a high moral vision can confer.

The result can seem ironic. If you have a strong sense of the overriding moral superiority of your worldview, then the need to protect and advance it can seem the most important duty of all.

Christian crusaders, Islamist militants, or the leaders of "freedom-loving nations", all justify what they see as necessary violence in the name of a higher good. Buddhist rulers and monks have been no exception.
Buddhist monks take part in a demonstration against the Organisation of the Islamic Conference in Rangoon, in October 2012

So, historically, Buddhism has been no more a religion of peace than Christianity.

One of the most famous kings in Sri Lankan history is Dutugamanu, whose unification of the island in the 2nd Century BC is related in an important chronicle, the Mahavamsa.

It says that he placed a Buddhist relic in his spear and took 500 monks with him along to war against a non-Buddhist king.He destroyed his opponents. After the bloodshed, some enlightened ones consoled him: "The slain were like animals; you will make the Buddha's faith shine."

Burmese rulers, known as "kings of righteousness", justified wars in the name of what they called true Buddhist doctrine.

In Japan, many samurai were devotees of Zen Buddhism and various arguments sustained them - killing a man about to commit a dreadful crime was an act of compassion, for example. Such reasoning surfaced again when Japan mobilised for World War II.

Buddhism took a leading role in the nationalist movements that emerged as Burma and Sri Lanka sought to throw off the yoke of the British Empire. Occasionally this spilled out into violence. In 1930s Rangoon, amid resorts to direct action, monks knifed four Europeans.

More importantly, many came to feel Buddhism was integral to their national identity - and the position of minorities in these newly independent nations was an uncomfortable one.

In 1983, Sri Lanka's ethnic tensions broke out into civil war. Following anti-Tamil pogroms, separatist Tamil groups in the north and east of the island sought to break away from the Sinhalese majority government. During the war, the worst violence against Sri Lankan Muslims came at the hands of the Tamil rebels. But after the fighting came to a bloody end with the defeat of the rebels in 2009, it seems that majority communal passions have found a new target in the Muslim minority.

In Burma, monks wielded their moral authority to challenge the military junta and argue for democracy in the Saffron Revolution of 2007. Peaceful protest was the main weapon of choice this time, and monks paid with their lives.

Now some monks are using their moral authority to serve a quite different end. They may be a minority, but the 500,000-strong monkhood, which includes many deposited in monasteries as children to escape poverty or as orphans, certainly has its fair share of angry young men.

The exact nature of the relationship between the Buddhist extremists and the ruling parties in both countries is unclear.

Sri Lanka's powerful Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa was guest of honour at the opening of a Buddhist Brigade training school, and referred to the monks as those who "protect our country, religion and race".

But the anti-Muslim message seems to have struck a chord with parts of the population.

Even though they form a majority in both countries, many Buddhists share a sense that their nations must be unified and that their religion is under threat.

The global climate is crucial. People believe radical Islam to be at the centre of the many of the most violent conflicts around the world. They feel they are at the receiving end of conversion drives by the much more evangelical monotheistic faiths. And they feel that if other religions are going to get tough, they had better follow suit.

source: BBC News - Why are Buddhist monks attacking Muslims?
 
Buddhist monks in the 2 countries - SL and Burma - both quoted here by BBC are a shame to the Buddhist community. On the otherhand, muslims in both these countries are model citizens.
 
Buddhist monks in the 2 countries - SL and Burma - both quoted here by BBC are a shame to the Buddhist community. On the otherhand, muslims in both these countries are model citizens.

Totally opposite the usually peace loving Buddhist monks we have usually seen.
 
Don't be too surprised if Wirathu turns out to be anti-Chinese and very pro West -- and very pro Army
 
Don't be too surprised if Wirathu turns out to be anti-Chinese and very pro West -- and very pro Army

Most Chinese are Buddhists and don't have a good record against Muslims - so how do you say that?
 
Buddhist monks in the 2 countries - SL and Burma - both quoted here by BBC are a shame to the Buddhist community. On the otherhand, muslims in both these countries are model citizens.

In both the nations the monks are very political and they ate an integral part of ethno religious ultra nationalism.

budhhist native of afghanistan and nearby areas were non violent. Their fate is well known. So violance is necessary if u want to survive.

Not in Burma or Lanka where that are a tiny non violent minority.
 
Back
Top Bottom