WaLeEdK2
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2014
- Messages
- 5,291
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, Russians won't. They have exercised restraint until now. Conventionally, NATO is more powerful tha we have to realize. Still Assad regime is till there, you can't say NATO wins.Yes and I'm afraid Russia may sink an american or nato destroyer just to put them in there place. Very easy to overwhelm a ship's defences. The question is will they and what will be the aftereffects.
Oh then we have to wait I guess for that to happen ,no other country operates one other than US and few of it's friends in NATOThe only viable way to deal with a stealthy fighter is to deploy another stealthy fighter.
S400 won't work against a stealthy target I think.
i never said anything militarily but if Russia threatens them on anything like they'll feel confident calling their bluff. The US/NATO are moving closer and closer to Russias border. but this is ONLY if Russia has no noteworthy response.And how Europe, NATO and Ukraine will deal with Russia? Please enlighten me. Running around and bark : "Assad should leave", "Russia should leave Crimea", "Russia should leave Donbass", "Russia should leave Georgia"?
And what Nato and Europe will do if Russia will deal with Ukraine the same way?
I spilled my coffee after seeing this. IMAO!After bosating loads...Putin gone into hiding
Trump-1 Putin-0
To be honest, Su35 is no rival with F35 or F22. the only solution left is Su57, but Su57 is not ready yet to deploy.Oh then we have to wait I guess for that to happen ,no other country operates one other than US and few of it's friends in NATO
Russia is nothing more than just empty words. They don't even bother to lift a finger to protect their friends. It sends a message to the world that Russia is a useless ally.
Imagine if North Korea attacked South Korea but ignored U.S targets in SK and then the U.S tells SK, "That's not my problem". No one would trust the U.S for help anymore if such happened.
Cruise missle is slow, not that difficult to intercept.I’m curious how many air defenses the coalition destroyed. Considering Syrian Air defences were filmed for over an hour firing at coalition missiles and in many cases appearing to shoot down the coalition missiles.
Air-burst weapons can be fired in the air indiscriminately.You ever heard of proximity fuses in which a proximity fuse detonates when it’s within target range?
And an S-200 is not an “aircraft gun shells”. You can’t even destinguish between triple-A guns and missiles. The closest thing to triple-A that Syria has is the Pantsirs and those don’t use proximity fuses when firing its canons.
View attachment 466239
I’m curious how many air defenses the coalition destroyed. Considering Syrian Air defences were filmed for over an hour firing at coalition missiles and in many cases appearing to shoot down the coalition missiles.
Propaganda-bots like you will boast that your allies stopped every cruise missile. You are not fooling anybody with such nonsense.I’m curious how many air defenses the coalition destroyed. Considering Syrian Air defences were filmed for over an hour firing at coalition missiles and in many cases appearing to shoot down the coalition missiles.