there also capable system to mach 3 supersonic anti ship missile other than your blah blah -8, these are US ESSM ,RAM, UK CAMM , Chinese FN-3000 and Russian variants @KapitaanAli
and the prove that Brahmouse doing S-maneuver to avoid interception show som kind of prove/clip for S maneuver of Brahmouse @Shamsher1990and do research before you post @Shamsher1990 navy ships has a radars to detect/track/guide anti missile for target @Shamsher1990
currently almost all major navies have AESA on ship that detect/track/guide their weapons to to the target and do some basic research then come here to post @Shamsher1990
oOk pakistani ship are defenseless against Brahmouse, and why do think Chinese is ships are also defenless because of your false supa powa ego @Shamsher1990they have FN-3000 Chinese equivalent of US RAM and ESSM @Shamsher1990
They do.
Jane's defense weekly ,aviation weekly and other respect site stated that fact kid and its specialized anti missile system kid not for genenral area SAMs, and speed doesn't matters because target missile is coming toward the ship called (head on interception) and And latest version of FN-3000 called FN-3000N has Range of 12 KM and ESSM and RAM has also asimilar range kid @Shamsher1990 this PK is just a site assumptions not facts for FN-3000 @Shamsher1990 and do have BARAK-8 video/clips that shows us that BARAK-8 capable of intercepting a supersonic missile @Shamsher1990 Tiger 
he is asking about supersonic anti ship missile you D!Ckhead @Shamsher1990 not air to surface missile you brain fart @Shamsher1990
I don't claim that BARAK-8 is capable of intercepting a supersonic missile, because I don't care and its not relevant to this discussion. So where is the video of HQ-XXXX intercepting a high supersonic target?
There are Muslims, hard working and rational ones and then there are Mud-Slimes like you. Go blow yourself up, which is what you want to do anyway.
your fellow senior Indian members always Claims that BARAK-8 can intercepts supersonic anti ship missile kid @Shamsher1990 don't include religion on this topic you dickhead @Shamsher1990
i'm telling that he asking to you, WHY WEST AREN'T DEVELOP SUPERSONIC MISSILE @Shamsher1990 
its mach 3 supersonic missile and not true cruise missile which can cruise 3-5 meters at terminal phase instead Brahmouse can travel 10 -30 meters at terminal phase so that mean it has big IR and radar RCS detect quite early at terminal phase, so that mean its easily intercept-able by ship short range SAMs like US evolved sea sparrow, UK, CAAM and chinese FN-3000, the main problem for intercepting supersonic missiles is reaction time, subsonic anti ship missiles have high reaction time that means the target ship will launches more anti missiles at the target (ANTI SHIP MISSILE) if detected early lets say 40 km subsonic anti ship cruise missile cover that distance 90 seconds, whereas supersonic anti ship missiles cover that distance 25-50 seconds depending on speed and that is the main advantages of supersonic anti ship missiles over subsonic cruise missile @HariPrasad
funny for you but its real facts you deusional @HariPrasad
West is more concern of sizzler type anti ship cruise missile (subsonic cruise terminal supersonic) missile like YJ-83 and Russian sizzler because they have low IR , radar signatures at cruise so harder to detect and at terminal stages they have supersonic speed with lees chance to intercept i research all on this matter a lot from USN EU navies sites, they are not consider all supersonic anti ship missile as main threat you delusional @HariPrasad
If Brahmos carries no threat to pakistani navy at all. Fine enjoy.funny for you but its real facts you deusional @HariPrasad
West is more concern of sizzler type anti ship cruise missile (subsonic cruise terminal supersonic) missile like YJ-83 and Russian sizzler because they have low IR , radar signatures at cruise so harder to detect and at terminal stages they have supersonic speed with lees chance to intercept i research all on this matter a lot from USN EU navies sites, they are not consider all supersonic anti ship missile as main threat you delusional @HariPrasad
i'm not saying that sir it is not a threat for PN, it is a major threat to PN not not major threat to major navies like USN, PLAAN, EU navies, we do lives in realty that you don't consider YJ-12, YJ-18 with similar speed to your vedic mighty Brahmouse @punit
We have no intention to fight a war against USN or NATO forces any time soon ..PLAN will be a tough nut to crack but any conflict with them will be in our backyard so I may say that Advantage will be with us.i'm not saying that sir it is not a threat for PN, it is a major threat to PN not not major threat to major navies like USN, PLAAN, EU navies, we do lives in realty that you don't consider YJ-12, YJ-18 with similar speed to your vedic mighty Brahmouse @punit
And what about yj-12 and yj-18 with similar capabilities with your BRAHMOUSE too how can you defend your naval assets with thoes supersonic ANTISHIP missiles @punit
Why do you think India is so keen on Baraks ? At present Barak -8 is one of the most potent weopen against super sonic Anti Ship Cruise missiles.And what about yj-12 and yj-18 with similar capabilities with your BRAHMOUSE too how can you defend your naval assets with thoes supersonic ANTISHIP missiles @punit
