Welcome back Mr thinktank!
You are pro-Chinese, that deserves a negative reaction score to "show solidarity".
Here are China's risks:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/electromagnetic-warfare-is-here IEEE.ORGIEEE XPLORE DIGITAL LIBRARYIEEE STANDARDSMORE SITES SIGN INJOIN IEEE Explore by topic IEEE websites place cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our websites, you agree to the placement of these...
defence.pk
This is very old technology, back in the 1950s-70s stuff like this was developed. And the cia/military writes much of the script of the hollywood suspense and other films, and brag about what usa is capable of doing. Over a dozen years ago, libertarian and conspiracy forums would discuss these types of weapons. And many would say you need a sophisticated faraday cage protecting the electronics to keep running your devise. Perhaps radiation-hardened chips could offer more protection. If they survive from extraterrestrial waves in space, maybe they could survive an attack like this. Even better is to combine protections.
I could envision the future of air warfare. Have stealth protect you from long range attack, EW spoofing & jamming protect you from mid range attack. And then get in close, aim these weapons at enemy fighters and watch the fighters fall into the ocean, if foreign aircraft are dumb enough to not build aircraft protected from electronic frying/disabling. You don't need missiles or guns. If the electronics of enemy planes are not protected, not even the ejector seat would work, unless the cockpit glass and seat are manual.
usa is saving these technologies to destroy China in a war, which is why trump was in the white house - to be the next Wilson. First term of trump - "kept us out of war". Second term - warmongering clown.
This is why China needs a very high tech/low tech strategy. You pour money into the best technology capable of defending against the high tech of usa. Then you spend trillions of yuan on new towed artillery and shore/coastal artillery with ranges over 30km, with manual and automatic/radar guided/etc.
If China's whole airforce and navy is destroyed by usa high tech yet China still has millions of artillery pieces to attack and defend (ie: invade and win Korea, invade and win India, etc), China can avoid a Versailles Treaty, which was the purpose of this bioweapon attack from trump. At a minimum trump wants to loot China and turn China into a Weimar Republic failed state of high unemployment and tens or hundreds of trillions in debt to cia and pals. (The Soviet Union was thoroughly looted aft the fall of the Soviet Union by "Russian" and Western oligarchs.) The other option is to nuke China in a war. Which is why China needs many and very effective counter attack delivery methods to preserve the peace.
usa got involved in ww1 based on lies so that UK investors could get paid and Germany would be looted and impoverished. Where German children would starve and beg for crumbs while Anglos were fat and had matresses stuffed full of pounds. This same death is planned for East Asians.
USSR had equal technology to that of the usa, and chose to back down over fear of crazies in Washington having a nuclear war, Kim survives because NK is not afraid of a nuke exchange (usa is afraid of a nuke exchange between NK and usa because usa would have to expose that no ICBM missile could ever hit usa soil if usa uses full means of protections - such exposed protections are being saved for a nuke exchange with China). Gorbachev and
JP2 were fooled by the cia that cia is about being nice and getting along, when cia is about rape, torture, killings, genocide, bribes, threats, blackmails, and anything else evil.
usa had 40 years during the cold war and 30 years after to develop means of protection from nuclear triad attack, and has done so. A nuclear exchange between China and usa would destroy China and not one nuke would touch usa soil. So China does not have the MAD protection of the USSR, so avoid nuke wars until China figures out methods of delivery that are successful.
trump losing saved 1.4 billion Chinese. China would have been baited by trump into a war, as any troll bully does to pick a fight. Yet China is still at risk; building better can be a motto - build newer ICBMs better and better and able to withstand stuff like
this.