What's new

#BloodlessEid trends on Twitter in India

Last year one female from PETA dared to ask for bloodless Eid and this is what happened with her.


Attack on PETA activists over 'vegan Eid': Bhopal's Muslims only shame themselves - Firstpost

though i don't like peta ( they hate cats and are nato agents in a way ), it is saddening to see the reaction of these bhopali so-called muslims.

did these particular muslims raise "allah hu akbar" in protest marches against the extremely anti-human nato invasions of libya and syria three years prior to this bhopal incident, resulting in deaths of 350,000+ brutal deaths?? did they form battalions in support of the libyan and syrian people in fighting against the nato militaries and their terrorist puppets??

no, many of these bhopal have become reactionary in the recent, as even personally told to me by a female relative in a different manner.

25 years ago, this incident would not have occurred... how does this ( Rebel Atrocity Videos :: www.uruknet.info :: informazione dal medio oriente :: information from middle east :: [vs-1] ) even compare with the pettiness of the bhopalis' cause??

in that location, they were essentially a criminal lynch mob, not muslims.

that final resolution of these issues would be resolved when artificial meat and artificial egg are introduced into public consumption... i have priorly made a post about this.

you may say all this to the muslims you know.
 
you have a fair point.

i have always maintained ( and said a few times on pdf ) that going on hajj does not imbue the pilgrim with magic and automatic safety... hajj is more a remembrance and personal journey than worship to be performed among astounding masses... over the centuries and especially in the last 40 years ( with more usage of airplanes ), it has become a hurried and impatient and massive ritualist picnic where many people take selfies to prove to others than they have been on hajj and when the hajis return, their relatives visit them and say salaams in a wonderous way and try to extract some "magic" out of the hajis... this behavior becomes idolatry and not the intent of the orginal hajj... this is especially true among modern indian muslims ( of the last 25 years ), among whom there is another phenomenon of going on three hajj's in seven or eight years and this is especially done so by the neo-middlle-income muslims.

i find this behaviour obscene and non-islamic.



i will copy here part of reply to another member months ago...

"my concept about god is closest to the islami thought of the formless presence who begets not, nor was he born ( from a creature )... this presence is not affected by worship or human hope.

the nepal earthquake demolished the prayer houses of buddhists,hindus, muslims, christians... and some of these had stood for centuries and been visited by countless daily worshipers and pilgrims... all those idols and accepted shapes of the prayer houses and their special establishment rituals were of no help.

what was this earthquake that destroyed in seconds the human imaginings of "the divine"... the earthquake was nature... perhaps nature is god and god is nature... immovable, undefeatable, existent.

in 2013, russia saw a passage in its skies of a meteor from space... it arrived without much warning and didn't even have to touch the ground to indirectly injure 7000+ people and damage 1000+ buildings... this world hangs delicate in the vastness of space and in space no understanding of human religion can make effect... i see space as the outer nature, the real nature.

what if a mad-man with the capabilities of elon musk were to go out into the "asteroid belt" ( between mars and jupiter ) and put rocket engines onto three 1-km wide asteroids, push them towards earth and smash them into riyadh, varanasi and vatican... would these three centers of extreme belief in religious mysticism survive the impacts??

the mad-man can claim that he is doing the work of nature, of god... and his belief will stand supreme to the belief of every religious believer on this world."

indeed, when chengiz khan rampaged through the muslim lands, defeating them, he told them collectively that it must be so that they had gone away from the path of god and committed sins and he was the punishment god ordained for them.

You did not answer. Should Mecca and Medina be demolished as Islami god has proved to be not existent or ineffectual in saving the ones who believe in your concept of god "of the formless presence who begets not, nor was he born ( from a creature )... this presence is not affected by worship or human hope" and does Islam need to be banned as a superstitious practice/belief?

you have a fair point.

i have always maintained ( and said a few times on pdf ) that going on hajj does not imbue the pilgrim with magic and automatic safety... hajj is more a remembrance and personal journey than worship to be performed among astounding masses... over the centuries and especially in the last 40 years ( with more usage of airplanes ), it has become a hurried and impatient and massive ritualist picnic where many people take selfies to prove to others than they have been on hajj and when the hajis return, their relatives visit them and say salaams in a wonderous way and try to extract some "magic" out of the hajis... this behavior becomes idolatry and not the intent of the orginal hajj... this is especially true among modern indian muslims ( of the last 25 years ), among whom there is another phenomenon of going on three hajj's in seven or eight years and this is especially done so by the neo-middlle-income muslims.

i find this behaviour obscene and non-islamic.



i will copy here part of reply to another member months ago...

"my concept about god is closest to the islami thought of the formless presence who begets not, nor was he born ( from a creature )... this presence is not affected by worship or human hope.

the nepal earthquake demolished the prayer houses of buddhists,hindus, muslims, christians... and some of these had stood for centuries and been visited by countless daily worshipers and pilgrims... all those idols and accepted shapes of the prayer houses and their special establishment rituals were of no help.

what was this earthquake that destroyed in seconds the human imaginings of "the divine"... the earthquake was nature... perhaps nature is god and god is nature... immovable, undefeatable, existent.

in 2013, russia saw a passage in its skies of a meteor from space... it arrived without much warning and didn't even have to touch the ground to indirectly injure 7000+ people and damage 1000+ buildings... this world hangs delicate in the vastness of space and in space no understanding of human religion can make effect... i see space as the outer nature, the real nature.

what if a mad-man with the capabilities of elon musk were to go out into the "asteroid belt" ( between mars and jupiter ) and put rocket engines onto three 1-km wide asteroids, push them towards earth and smash them into riyadh, varanasi and vatican... would these three centers of extreme belief in religious mysticism survive the impacts??

the mad-man can claim that he is doing the work of nature, of god... and his belief will stand supreme to the belief of every religious believer on this world."

indeed, when chengiz khan rampaged through the muslim lands, defeating them, he told them collectively that it must be so that they had gone away from the path of god and committed sins and he was the punishment god ordained for them.

You did not answer. Should Mecca and Medina be demolished as Islami god has proved to be not existent or ineffectual in saving the ones who believe in your concept of god "of the formless presence who begets not, nor was he born ( from a creature )... this presence is not affected by worship or human hope" and does Islam need to be banned as a superstitious practice/belief?
 
You did not answer. Should Mecca and Medina be demolished as Islami god has proved to be not existent or ineffectual in saving the ones who believe in your concept of god "of the formless presence who begets not, nor was he born ( from a creature )... this presence is not affected by worship or human hope"

you need to read my lengthy post again.

and does Islam need to be banned as a superstitious practice/belief?

the modern indian "civil marriage" procedure is indirectly based on islami wedding and marriage procedure.

you see, islam is not centered around rituals... islam is originally more a political/social/economic theory akin to modern socialism, with practical steps to simplify life and bring justice.

imagine if the islami forwarding of non-interest economics was included in post-1947 india... the farmers suicides in india would have been among the things that wouldn't have existed... how is this superstition??

it is true that many south asians and some others are muslims in a superstitious and superficial way, but they are merely carrying over the pre-islam beliefs and traditions...islam is originally a simple religion that was complicated by kings, emperors, priests ( none of whom are part of the original ).
 
you need to read my lengthy post again.



the modern indian "civil marriage" procedure is indirectly based on islami wedding and marriage procedure.

you see, islam is not centered around rituals... islam is more a political/social/economic theory akin to modern socialism, with practical steps to simplify life and bring justice.

imagine if the islami forwarding of non-interest economics was included in post-1947 india... the farmers suicides in india would have been among the things that wouldn't have existed... how is this superstition??

it is true that many south asians and some others are muslims in a superstitious and superficial way, but they are merely carrying over the pre-islam beliefs and traditions...islam is originally a simple religion that was complicated by kings, emperors, priests ( none of whom are part of the original ).

What it means is that whether people who believe in the Islamic God are killed or not in their holiest of places, Islam is a valid religion for you and you will keep making excuses after excuses for Islam and blame everyone else but Islam. As expected from a Islamic hypocrite.

Modern Indian civil marriage is not based on Islam though yes it considers marriage as a contract much along the lines of Islamic marriage or common law marriages of West which is why it has not been adopted by the Indian masses and the masses still prefer the traditional marriages.
 
Back
Top Bottom