BlackWater Deployed in UAE(For the Greater Good of Cross+)

[Mike2011]

Now, why would an indian want that? Something smells rotten.

Oil money is the problem for the world. Terrorism and Muslim extremism will end for sure.

---------- Post added at 11:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:59 AM ----------

Forget about Bangdesh, they definitely hate Pakistan. And Afghanistan is complicated 'famous graveyard of Empires' long history. Afghans fighters will resist it. However Pakistan must build up its economy.



Absolutely not correct to attack ME. I know you are trolling. What we Pakistan is suggest to give them choice "You are with us or with the terrorists." ISI agents will can do superb jobs with guidances and instructions to Arabs cowards.

It is my honest opinion. Thats good for world peace.

 

[A1Kaid]

Think of this as Muhammad Bin Qasim Reversed. Muhammad bin Qasim came to modern day Pakistan from Arabia, and now from Pakistan we send our own military to Arabia.

Many of you would agree the invasion of Muhammad bin Qasim is a good thing but you disagree and oppose Pakistan doing the reverse? Seems hypocritical.

 

[TARIQ BN ZIYAAD]

UAE didn't learned the bad examples of Blackwater used to be in Pakistan few years ago. Why UAE accept it in its own soil? The answer is clearly they are dumb coward Arabs blindly to be used against Iran. Allah forbidden Sunni and Shia hatred in Arab souls. Not only this, Arab permitted British to create Zionist State instead Palestines. What's wrong with Arab people, Wahabbism and sucide bombing terrorists?

That's what Pakistan must control all of them and slaves them. It is perfect opportunity to control all of them.

Their grand fathers brought u the beutiful religion of islam save u and ur forefathers and ur next generations from hell and u want to slave their grandsons?

itni nafrat or itni ihsan framoshi kun?
or might be u r angry coz u r muslim today?

TARIQ

 

[TARIQ BN ZIYAAD]

Think of this as Muhammad Bin Qasim Reversed. Muhammad bin Qasim came to modern day Pakistan from Arabia, and now from Pakistan we send our own military to Arabia.

Many of you would agree the invasion of Muhammad bin Qasim is a good thing but you disagree and oppose Pakistan doing the reverse? Seems hypocritical.

Mohammad bin qasim brought us religion of islam and u wanna make them slaves there is a lot of difference

TARIQ

 

[VelocuR]

Their grand fathers brought u the beutiful religion of islam save u and ur forefathers and ur next generations from hell and u want to slave their grandsons?

itni nafrat or itni ihsan framoshi kun?
or might be u r angry coz u r muslim today?

TARIQ

Only Allah give us beautiful religion, not Arabs. Before Islam, Arabs were idols worshipping and drunks, which is still same today. May Allah guide us to be united billion Muslims to the straight path except Arabs.

 

[A1Kaid]

Mohammad bin qasim brought us religion of islam and u wanna make them slaves there is a lot of difference

TARIQ

I didn't espouse enslaving them. I didn't say anything about slavery I said empowerment. Read carefully.

 

[TARIQ BN ZIYAAD]

Only Allah give us beautiful religion, not Arabs. Before Islam, Arabs were idols worshipping and drunks, which is still same today. May Allah guide us to be united billion Muslims to the straight path except Arabs.

Allah gave u the beutiful religion thru the Prophet pbuh and then some good ppl who spread that religion all over the world

Regarding ur dua it will never be accepted by Allah so u waisted it but showed ur true class

TARIQ

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

True, in 10 years time Pakistan has to undergo rapid change and development.

I totally agree. Pakistan has to shake off the "we can't do this, we can't do that" mentality. You CAN do anything with the right government, the right people, and the willingness to even eat grass to get it done. Pakistan did it before! Pakistan's nuclear program, remember?

Once Pakistan eliminates religious extremism, Western puppets, and has a strong, development and sustainability oriented government, it will grow very quickly, perhaps at 8% in real terms, per year.

Every time Pakistan has an incompetent government, droughts or floods happen. This is not a coincidence, but due to mismanagement of water and unnecessarily provoking India, which will use its water against Pakistan. 10 years of hard work and lying low, and afterwards, Pakistani carriers might be docking in UAE province of Pakistan.

 

[IFB]

We can also try and force Turkish support and Saudi support for this.

Say to them

You're either with us or you are with the terrorist.

 

[Imran Khan]

there country there rules there need we have nothing to do with them they are free call blackwater or redwater

 

[Al Bhatti]

UAE: Arming up with mercenaries

What possible security risks could have motivated the UAE to hire outside help?


The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has hired the founder of the controversial US security company Blackwater, to set up a paramilitary force made up of foreign mercenaries in Abu Dhabi.

Blackwater founder Erik Prince is to set up an 800-member battalion of foreign troops.

Documents obtained by The New York Times (NYT) on Sunday showed the crown prince of Abu Dhabi being behind the $529m deal.

It is a contentious move, which raises questions about loyalty, the role of citizens and the potential instability brought on by the popular uprisings in the Arab world.

The NYT said the covert unit will be used to put down internal revolts, defend oil pipelines and skyscrapers from any possible terrorist attack.

It also claimed that fighters from Colombia and South Africa have already been flown into the Emirate, where its rulers are reportedly deeply concerned about the popular unrest in the "Arab world as well as the perceived threat from Iran".

Is the UAE being paranoid or just protecting its citizens? What possible security risks could have motivated a small country like the UAE to hire outside help? How does the knowledge that the UAE is arming up with mercenaries sit in general?

Inside Story, with presenter Jane Dutton, discusses with Abdulhadi Alajmi, the board secretary of the Kuwait Historical Society; James Worrall, a fellow at the School of Politics and International Studies at the University of Leeds; and Phyllis Bennis, a fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies.

Old news discussed earlier on this forum

 

[Al Bhatti]

Think of this as Muhammad Bin Qasim Reversed. Muhammad bin Qasim came to modern day Pakistan from Arabia, and now from Pakistan we send our own military to Arabia.

Many of you would agree the invasion of Muhammad bin Qasim is a good thing but you disagree and oppose Pakistan doing the reverse? Seems hypocritical.

First do something in Pakistan and bring it to the level of the development, commerce, GDP of
UAE and then talk this non-sense of Pakistan taking over UAE.

Muhamamd Qasim invaded for a good cause and you want to invade for spreading the corruption in Pakistan to other countries. Let the corrption burn Pakistan alone better than Pakistan exporting it to other countries. Why you want to hijack the developemnt in another country and destroy it with the diseases (corruption, lawlessness) that are in Pakistan.

If you really want Pakistan to add some area, why not Pakistan taking over southern part of Iran and afghanistan? Southern areas of Iran under pakistan control will be a good thing for GCC states. And parts of Afghanistan in Pakistani control as it is enjoying the same level of corruption as in Pakistan if not more.

We will increase the shore line and mineral rich areas, also balauchistan which is now divided into three parts will become one entity inside Pakistan.

 

[Roybot]

Pakistan taking over UAE.

I think A1Kaid is just trolling here for lulz.

 

[DV RULES]

there country there rules there need we have nothing to do with them they are free call blackwater or redwater

This thread is full of illusions, once they want full democracy in future ad on other hand taking rights of another country into own hands, you are right that they are free to call them but who will wake up dreamers?

 

[Xestan]

Idea presented by A1Kaid is at some extent right, but I think we too have rulers like Arabs have at the moment. "Invasion" is a too harsh word to use, Pakistan invading a another Muslim country? Com'on! See how awkward it sounds lol What comes in my mind is the unification of all the Muslim States under a one central Rule, whatever you wanna call it, "Khilafah", "caliphate" or "Islamic Union" or "United States of Islam" perhaps

All the countries have their own governments but them all will be under one central command and for that, the word we should use is "Leadership", Pakistan as a leader for that unification block, our President, Khalifah or whatever will be the head of that empire. Like this we can have a consensus between all the countries and one who doesn't want to stay in that block can stay isolated. But for this, we need a TRUE Islamic leader, a revolutionary. If even after this unification we have someone like Zardari leading the Muslims, we're doomed!

Anyone ever imagined a person like Zardari becoming the Supreme Commander of the most powerful Muslim Military? Imagine becoming leader of all Muslims. I don't even want to imagine lol