What's new

Bin Laden informer: Dr Shakil Afridi sacked

This doctor was Spy. He was serving the Osama. But at the day, he was thinking to get reward of Millions of dollar for personal benefit fom USA. He did not tell the Pak government about the secret activities. I hope Pakistan supreme court will give him death punishment because he was spy and he was feeding the osama.
 
i want this traitor hanged man, why just sack him?

Perhaps clearing grounds for him to be dismissed of everything even Pakistan..soon to become a new citizen of united states as was fortold he is to be exchanged for continuous supply of F-16s spare parts...people would rather want him released and shot by "so called patriot Pakistani in the name of gharat" you know what I mean. ;)
 
.................. follow the norm of every man is innocent until proven guilty in the court of law. You will be tried, evidence will be presented against you and then either a judge, a panel of judges or a competent jury will find you guilty or not guilty and then your sentencing will be carried out.

That is the process in Pakistan. .................

Asim: Does the above post of yours apply to Dr. Afridi's case as well?
 
Actually this case is the centuries old debate on whether ends justify the means. While the end (killing of Osama) was good, the means (of betraying one's country) were bad. The simple answer is that if you believe ends justify the means, this doc is innocent. Else he is guilty.

Pakistan for its own image's sake should try and find a middle ground
 
In the long run this "dismissal" may serve the doctor well. There is no indication that he was terminated because the medical services he provided were faulty in some way. That implies that he was investigated and that the vaccines he provided were genuine, not phony, as had previously been alleged.

Feisal Naqvi argued that it should now be very difficult to prove that Dr. Afridi is guilty of ANY illegal act; it remains to try to prove him guilty of treason to his country, something that can only be done by confessing that Osama bin Laden was a state asset and knew that the information he provided would somehow violate Pakistani sovereignty. The first part Pakistan doesn't want to admit; the second part has yet to be proved and while it may hold in Pakistani law under the post-9/11 U.N. Security Council Resolutions Pakistani sovereignty doesn't apply; by insisting on prosecution rather than exoneration Pakistan may be subject to international sanctions.
 
Feisal Naqvi argued that it should now be very difficult to prove that Dr. Afridi is guilty of ANY illegal act; it remains to try to prove him guilty of treason to his country, something that can only be done by confessing that Osama bin Laden was a state asset and knew that the information he provided would somehow violate Pakistani sovereignty.

Don't understand that part really. State secret or not, Afridi was hand in hand with a foreign spy agency inside Pakistan.
 
Don't understand that part really. State secret or not, Afridi was hand in hand with a foreign spy agency inside Pakistan.
Naqvi argued that if the vaccines were genuine then Afridi's acts were not illegal in and of themselves but only if Afridi acted with the knowledge that he would be committing treason against Pakistan as a result - the only possible crime being certain knowledge that he was empowering Americans to raid OBL's compound.
 
This doctor was Spy. He was serving the Osama. But at the day, he was thinking to get reward of Millions of dollar for personal benefit fom USA. He did not tell the Pak government about the secret activities. I hope Pakistan supreme court will give him death punishment because he was spy and he was feeding the osama.

How is he a traitor GOP and army both are allies in WOT .. hundreds of statements confirming they are a part of it. OBL was the prime suspects behind WOT all Dr AFridi did was to help catch OBL.
 
In the long run this "dismissal" may serve the doctor well. There is no indication that he was terminated because the medical services he provided were faulty in some way. That implies that he was investigated and that the vaccines he provided were genuine, not phony, as had previously been alleged.

Feisal Naqvi argued that it should now be very difficult to prove that Dr. Afridi is guilty of ANY illegal act; it remains to try to prove him guilty of treason to his country, something that can only be done by confessing that Osama bin Laden was a state asset and knew that the information he provided would somehow violate Pakistani sovereignty. The first part Pakistan doesn't want to admit; the second part has yet to be proved and while it may hold in Pakistani law under the post-9/11 U.N. Security Council Resolutions Pakistani sovereignty doesn't apply; by insisting on prosecution rather than exoneration Pakistan may be subject to international sanctions.

good argument there Solomon

our argument is based on the fact that he covertly worked for a foreign entity under the pretext of vaccination program misusing his position of trust and authority and failed to inform the authorities, the consequences of which were a string of terrorist attacks in Pakistan costing hundreds of lives.


the hundreds of civilians and govt officials killed afterwords and public and private property destroyed as a consequence of 2 May operation WERE INDEED STATE ASSETS.

his live capture by ISI would have not resulted in such a violent reaction and his next destination after the capture would not have been any different from Al Libbi or KSM.

so as far as I am concerned, this former doctor should spend the rest of his lie in solitary confinement and Pakistan should resist the pressure from America until this doctor loses any economic value for its foreign employers and then continue to spend the rest of his life looking back at his actions.


Americans can take his next of Kin and reward him handsomely by settling them in America. I have no problem with that.
 
our argument is based on the fact that he covertly worked for a foreign entity under the pretext of vaccination program misusing his position of trust and authority and failed to inform the authorities -
For that he was dismissed, yes.

- the consequences of which were a string of terrorist attacks in Pakistan costing hundreds of lives.
Does anybody see how that follows? 'Cause I don't.
 
..........
our argument is based on the fact that he covertly worked for a foreign entity under the pretext of vaccination program misusing his position of trust and authority and failed to inform the authorities...................

That argument will need the element of knowing that he was working for a foreign entity to be proven in a court of law to be robust.
 
For that he was dismissed, yes.

Does anybody see how that follows? 'Cause I don't.

As the saying goes "You see what you eyes wanna see"...You wont follow it for ages solomon because you dont wanna accept truth ..You just like to distort facts so that they can serve your means and purposes...

Why americans dint show any compassion towards state of pakistan for fighting an american war and getting thousands of soldiers and citizens killed...on the otherhand american congress is more interested in one man who forsure comitted treason by helping outsiders for the sake of money and seconding nationals interests for dollars I am sure americans have plans to use him further as an interlocutor or a spy...or they wanna give the impression whoever sides them against pakistani national interest will be given dollars and american citizenship....what you call this solomon in your language?

That argument will need the element of knowing that he was working for a foreign entity to be proven in a court of law to be robust.

Was it ever proven in any court of Law of that osama was involved in 9/11....just asking no offence...
 
Back
Top Bottom