Big Three finally end. India lost both governance and revenue vote.

[hussain0216]

How??

Because they think of you little more then a obedient dog and you have been naughty by voting against them and must be punished.

You put yourselves in this position

 

[WhyCry]

How??

Because in the new proposal full membership will be under review as well. Zimbabwe and Bangladesh are the mostly likely ones to be dropped.

 

[WAJsal]

Australia and England want to save Cricket i guess.

80% revenues are from India. With out India, ICC is nothing.

And vice versa...

 

[WhyCry]

Actually without ICC India is nothing. Rest of the world can just get on by playing with each other like it did before India started to contribute anything. Just with less funds but India will get 0.

This is nothing but peanuts for BCCI or India in your case. IPL itself generate around $400 million (expected to surpass this year). This amount that is being discussed is for the 8 year term.

 

[Anubis]

Because in the new proposal full membership will be under review as well. Zimbabwe and Bangladesh are the mostly likely ones to be dropped.

The ICC agreed to remove one significant proposal from its new governance model - the reclassification of Full Member status to Associate membership if a set of criteria was not met when a board was evaluated. Many Full Members including the Bangladesh Cricket Board, Zimbabwe Cricket and Sri Lanka Cricket were against it.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/story/1094750.html

 

[WhyCry]

I would personally want BCCI to pull out just a day before of the start so that a replacement team isn't arranged as it will increase the losses in revenues.

Anyways by tomorrow night, most of the thing will be clear.

Don't want that since the sponsors will not be able to pull out or get a better deal for their marketing.

This is the thing that will hurt ICC's revenue.

Hahah....So you think if no India we can world cup I appreciate your good will for our team.

I am not desperate your own countrymen saying this to back out from ICC event

Uff isolated India in ICC

I want India to back out as well if the BCCI demands are not met.

Actually without ICC India is nothing. Rest of the world can just get on by playing with each other like it did before India started to contribute anything. Just with less funds but India will get 0.

Ahem... Ahem BCCI to please you --> India is going to make $400 mil within 3 months of IPL.

For other Members India is needed for their survival. BCCI is not in need of ICC for survival. IPL itself generates enough money then all other boards combined (without India).

 

[H!TchHiker]

I want India to back out as well if the BCCI demands are not met.


Ahem... Ahem BCCI to please you --> India is going to make $400 mil within 3 months of IPL.

For other Members India is needed for their survival. BCCI is not in need of ICC for survival. IPL itself generates enough money then all other boards combined (without India).

Good India should back out and show some stomach, not only use words.
I agree India should play 3 -4 season of IPL every year to make money..Its sufficient for BCCI..Let ICC other members play with each other separately..

 

[Kabira]

Ahem... Ahem BCCI to please you --> India is going to make $400 mil within 3 months of IPL.

For other Members India is needed for their survival. BCCI is not in need of ICC for survival. IPL itself generates enough money then all other boards combined (without India).

IPL is nothing without foreign players, wake up.

 

[Shajida Khan]

Actually without ICC India is nothing. Rest of the world can just get on by playing with each other like it did before India started to contribute anything. Just with less funds but India will get 0.

It is quite the other way round. ICC needs India to participate and India can play with Rest of the world without ICC. Issue here is that of ICC not rest of the world and India. ICC is the middle man in this equation and can be eliminated and their share distributed among all the other clubs like BCCI.
BTW, just IPL itself generates so much money for BCCI.

 

[kabooter_maila]

The Indian cricket board's ambition of using its clout to change the International Cricket Council's (ICC) stand on reversing the planned changes in the revenue sharing formula was dealt a severe vote on Wednesday when the world body voted overwhelmingly against the Board of Control for Cricket in India for changes in the governance and revenue structures.

On the first day of the ICC Board Meeting in Dubai, both the change in governance structure as well as the revamped revenue model were put to a floor test.

BCCI lost the vote on 'governance and constitutional changes' by a 1-9 margin while the revenue model, which was the bigger bone of contention, saw India getting walloped by a 2-8 margin. The only country that voted with BCCI was Sri Lanka.

"Yes, the votings are over. It was 8-2 in favour of revamped revenue model and 9-1 in favour of constitutional changes," a senior BCCI functionary present in Dubai told PTI.

"The BCCI has voted against both as we had, in principle, maintained that all these changes are completely unacceptable for us. At this point, we can only say that all options are open for us. We would have to go back to our SGM and apprise the members of the situation," he added.

It was learnt that since BCCI rejected outright the additional USD 100 million payout in revenue, it was once again given the original option of USD 290 million which is a USD 280 million cut from the USD 570 million India had been getting till last year.

Expect lonely dogs barking non-stop on the top of their slums. The other two countries (England and Australia) felt some shame at being a part of discriminatory big three arrangement. But the slummies are infamously shameless.

 

[Shajida Khan]

IPL is nothing without foreign players, wake up.

You need to wake up. Other players can participate even without ICC.

 

[My-Analogous]

80% revenues are from India. With out India, ICC is nothing.

Good, leave ICC

For the moment we will most likely stop participating in ICC organised events.

Bilateral Series will go on, as we don't pay revenue to ICC on it.

Grown up. If ICC stop these boards then where India will go? India is nothing without at least 8 boards.

 

[hussain0216]

You need to wake up. Other players can participate even without ICC.

But if they had any decency, dignity and honour they will boycott india, the cricketing world is tired of india and come round to Pakistan's point of view

 

[xyxmt]

But India vs. Pak has no white men. Still it generates more GRPs than any other match domestic or overseas.
So then what are viewers really watching?

Pakistani fast bowlers
and historical animosity and eagerness to beat Pakistan in any form

 

[WhyCry]

Good India should back out and show some stomach, not only use words.
I agree India should play 3 -4 season of IPL every year to make money..Its sufficient for BCCI..Let ICC other members play with each other separately..

Don't tell me what is sufficient when pakistans own cricket is surviving on "Chillad" coming from ICC; which in turn comes from India.

IPL is nothing without foreign players, wake up.

First thing, India doesn't need to be in ICC for foreign players. It's more of the fantasy league with all popular players.

Secondly, India can still play bilaterally within the ICC context even withdrawing from the Champions trophy.