Big Three finally end. India lost both governance and revenue vote.

[H!TchHiker]

Don't tell me what is sufficient when pakistans own cricket is surviving on "Chillad" coming from ICC; which in turn comes from India.


First thing, India doesn't need to be in ICC for foreign players. It's more of the fantasy league with all popular players.

Secondly, India can still play bilaterally within the ICC context even withdrawing from the Champions trophy.

What is chillad? Might be some Hindi slang ?
Second why you want to play with same countries when they are opposing you in ICC?

 

[WhyCry]

But India vs. Pak has no white men. Still it generates more GRPs than any other match domestic or overseas.
So then what are viewers really watching?

What is chillad? Might be some Hindi slang ?
Second why you want to play with same countries when they are opposing you in ICC?

Yup! like pakistan is begging to playing cricket with India. Aur farmiye Sethi saheb.

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

The Indian cricket board's ambition of using its clout to change the International Cricket Council's (ICC) stand on reversing the planned changes in the revenue sharing formula was dealt a severe vote on Wednesday when the world body voted overwhelmingly against the Board of Control for Cricket in India for changes in the governance and revenue structures.

On the first day of the ICC Board Meeting in Dubai, both the change in governance structure as well as the revamped revenue model were put to a floor test.

BCCI lost the vote on 'governance and constitutional changes' by a 1-9 margin while the revenue model, which was the bigger bone of contention, saw India getting walloped by a 2-8 margin. The only country that voted with BCCI was Sri Lanka.

"Yes, the votings are over. It was 8-2 in favour of revamped revenue model and 9-1 in favour of constitutional changes," a senior BCCI functionary present in Dubai told PTI.

"The BCCI has voted against both as we had, in principle, maintained that all these changes are completely unacceptable for us. At this point, we can only say that all options are open for us. We would have to go back to our SGM and apprise the members of the situation," he added.

It was learnt that since BCCI rejected outright the additional USD 100 million payout in revenue, it was once again given the original option of USD 290 million which is a USD 280 million cut from the USD 570 million India had been getting till last year.

Dont understand your or others glee in India losing this status. The one who moved the proposal itself is an Indian. Without Shashank Manohar any of this thing wouldnt have been possible at the first place.

Other countries chief can have no credit in this issue. Personally this is good for cricket as a whole. And at the same time, other countries are now indirectly paid by India.

 

[H!TchHiker]

Yup! like pakistan is begging to playing cricket with India. Aur farmiye Sethi saheb.

I am not Sheti ..Pakistan vs india is another topic ..
You skip the relevant question ..it's not Pakistan ...Eng ,Aust, SA,NZ all others in ICC opposing you ...

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Finaly no more monopoly and more international series

 

[WhyCry]

I am not Sheti ..Pakistan vs india is another topic ..
You skip the relevant question ..it's not Pakistan ...Eng ,Aust, SA,NZ all others in ICC opposing you ...

They have voted in favour of the new proposal (which happens to be against India). They all are lined outside BCCI office for their next bilateral series.

 

[Verve]

It is not white man, but an Indian man named shashank manohar that ended the big three

At the behest of who you should be asking!

 

[Shajida Khan]

But if they had any decency, dignity and honour they will boycott india, the cricketing world is tired of india and come round to Pakistan's point of view

Professional players do not play for decency, dignity and honor, they play for emoluments.

 

[Peshwa]

Pakistani fast bowlers
and historical animosity and eagerness to beat Pakistan in any form

Well at least you admit it's not for some perceived "gora" players. Lol

 

[hussain0216]

Professional players do not play for decency, dignity and honor, they play for emoluments.

Well they are going to have to get their moisturisers from somewhere else then!

 

[ifesvr]

So we had a pay structure by ICC until 2014, where every team got equal share (it was $67m each in 2014). An Indian, Srinivasan comes in and brings the Big Three structure where India gets the lion's share now for last 2 yrs. But some other teams make noise and another Indian, Manohar comes in and reduces India's share from what 22% to 16% but still having us the lion's share. How is this a victory for the others who were opposing it. You are not going back to the pre-2014 equal share model!!

Based on the above [from indian express article in Feb] the pre-Big Three pay structure should mean an equal $87m for 10 teams. So basically the new structure still means every loses except India. The loss is minimal for England and high for Zimbabwe.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Lost like 9 to 1

 

[DHARMICACE]

But if they had any decency, dignity and honour they will boycott india, the cricketing world is tired of india and come round to Pakistan's point of view

Yeah like everybody was caring about pakistan ?

Expect lonely dogs barking non-stop on the top of their slums. The other two countries (England and Australia) felt some shame at being a part of discriminatory big three arrangement. But the slummies are infamously shameless.

karachi is the slum of Asia .

Srinivasan

This Srinivasan was an cnut really.

 

[Kabira]

You need to wake up. Other players can participate even without ICC.

Nope they can't.

 

[Menace2Society]

Even Zimbabwe voted against India