What's new

Big Three finally end. India lost both governance and revenue vote.

Are you suggesting that in a music festival like say Coachella, all musicians should share equal revenue even though the ticket holder came to see the showstopper?!
That music festival would still draw more than enough crowds were Coachella to play alone.

India playing itself will not do the same.

A better comparison here would be to FIFA and its revenue distribution model.
 
To add to this further, I remember recently in world cup India was eliminated from the finals race, this lead to huge downfall in earnings from viewership and loss for advertizers and organizers. As much hypocrite as it sounds, reality is that Indian are there only to watch few Indian players taking shots and bowling.
most of the Indians are fake fans remember Yuraj Singh at the end of WC 2014 even though he won us two worldcups and ofcourse Virat Kohli at the end of WC 2015.
 
The article says Sri Lanka is the only other country to vote for BCCI.
Bangladesh's own membership is at stake now.

Yes India should stop playing in ICC organised events mainly Champion Trophy and World cup...Or India can create its own International body .8-)
I doubt india will ever go to such step...
Don't be so desperate for the world cup win... You will get only Mauka- Mauka
 
This is a great victory for Pakistan!!!

We were the only ones who saw straight through this big 3 bullshit right from the start and stood against India

Whilst cowards fell in line

Today cricket won!!! The defeat of India was needed to protect the game we love, and Pakistan was proven right
 
Don't be so desperate for the world cup win... You will get only Mauka- Mauka
Hahah....So you think if no India we can world cup :o:I appreciate your good will for our team.

I am not desperate your own countrymen saying this to back out from ICC event

Uff isolated India in ICC:(
 
Last edited:
Can anyone explain whether ICC takes all the revenue and then gives it back to the boards or do they just take a percentage of the revenue?
 
Exactly - ICC event generated revenue should be distributed fairly while domestic league revenue goes directly to the respective boards organizing the events. So what's the problem with the ICC proposal?
Well the definition of fairly is already unfair when it comes to BCCI which generates over 80% of the revenue and gets less than 21% revenue.
 
That music festival would still draw more than enough crowds were Coachella to play alone.

India playing itself will not do the same.

A better comparison here would be to FIFA and its revenue distribution model.

Well then please explain why artists especially the headliners at Coachella get paid way more than the other "regular" artists performing? What is the justification there?
Also, music festivals work on line ups.
If you take the example of Governors ball in NYC, its revenue and ticket sales have dropped the last 3 years due to the lack of elite line ups.

On a separate note, FIFA is a bad comparison because advertising revenue is not generated through TV ads. A 90 min game has one interval. Revenue is more sponsorship based, which is a very different model.
 
Can anyone explain whether ICC takes all the revenue and then gives it back to the boards or do they just take a percentage of the revenue?
ICC takes full revenue of its own hosted events (Like world cup -in any format, champions trophy etc.) and pays from its own wallet as well.
 
In a months time the table will reverse and few countries will pay the price. Just keep track of the developing story.
 
80% revenues are from India. With out India, ICC is nothing.

Actually without ICC India is nothing. Rest of the world can just get on by playing with each other like it did before India started to contribute anything. Just with less funds but India will get 0.
 
Back
Top Bottom