I disagree with accepting the status quo. The Pakistani Ulema and Military Generals would not agree to that.
The Khan of Kalat agreed to accede to Pakistan, you moron.
LOLYou mentioned referendum in original plan you moron. Cant you be consistent in your argument or do you have Ghajini issue?
Yes you moronic posionous person. Thats is true, referendum is necessary in partition plan.
China also has a stake in Kashmir called Aksai Chin and Shaksgam Valley. Yes indeed we will see.
yeah they'll do it bro (if things align to our goals and national interests, red lines etc) and give the blame to the political leadership...I disagree with accepting the status quo. The Pakistani Ulema and Military Generals would not agree to that.
The Khan of Kalat agreed to accede to Pakistan, you moron.
You know nothing of Pakistani history, or you get it from Wikipedia
There is also Makran and Las bela princely states to discuss about which make part of modern Balochistan.
Yes in those princely states plebiscite was used.
Now shoo!
Personally I do not mind war to solve the Kashmir dispute because India keeps running away from the Plebiscite option.
Mao even called him you know lol
Man, Pakistan had incompetent leaders. But now things are changing fast. People are better educated than they were 50-70 years ago.
Here you moron, read what your own Pak papers say.
nation.com.pk
www.aninews.in
Hey Moron, I do not know how authentic the Pakistani news article. Hey moron you are using an Indian newsoutlet.Here you moron, read what your own Pak papers say.
How Balochistan became a part of Pakistan – a historical perspective
Balochistan consists of the south west of Pakistan. In the west it borders with Afghanistan and Iran and in the south it has the Arabian Sea. It accounts for
Some excerpts from this article.
"The Khan of Kalat objected to their accession, arguing that it was a violation of Kalat’s Standstill Agreement with Pakistan."
" On March 26, 1948, the Pakistan Army was ordered to move into the Baloch coastal region of Pasni, Jiwani and Turbat. This was the first act of aggression prior to the march on Kalat by a Pakistani military detachment on April 1, 1948. "
" Jinnah accepted this accession under the gun. It should be noted that the Balochistan Assembly had already rejected any suggestion of forfeiting the independence of Balochistan on any pretext. So even the signature of the Khan of Kalat taken under the barrel of the gun, was not viable, because the parliament had rejected the accession and the accession was never mandated by the British Empire either, who had given Balochistan under Kalat independence before India. "
" To say that the Baloch have been ill-treated by all governments and military establishments since their land was illegally and forcefully taken over would be an understatement. "
If you talk about referendum, then read this
Asia’s Premier News Agency - India News, Business & Political, National & International, Bollywood, Sports | ANI News
ANI brings the latest news on Politics and Current Affairs in India & around the World, Sports, Health & Fitness, Entertainment, News.
Why don't you ask Balochis if they want to be part of Pakistan, obviously they will say yes! LOLHere you moron, read what your own Pak papers say.
How Balochistan became a part of Pakistan – a historical perspective
Balochistan consists of the south west of Pakistan. In the west it borders with Afghanistan and Iran and in the south it has the Arabian Sea. It accounts for
Some excerpts from this article.
"The Khan of Kalat objected to their accession, arguing that it was a violation of Kalat’s Standstill Agreement with Pakistan."
" On March 26, 1948, the Pakistan Army was ordered to move into the Baloch coastal region of Pasni, Jiwani and Turbat. This was the first act of aggression prior to the march on Kalat by a Pakistani military detachment on April 1, 1948. "
" Jinnah accepted this accession under the gun. It should be noted that the Balochistan Assembly had already rejected any suggestion of forfeiting the independence of Balochistan on any pretext. So even the signature of the Khan of Kalat taken under the barrel of the gun, was not viable, because the parliament had rejected the accession and the accession was never mandated by the British Empire either, who had given Balochistan under Kalat independence before India. "
" To say that the Baloch have been ill-treated by all governments and military establishments since their land was illegally and forcefully taken over would be an understatement. "
If you talk about referendum, then read this
Asia’s Premier News Agency - India News, Business & Political, National & International, Bollywood, Sports | ANI News
ANI brings the latest news on Politics and Current Affairs in India & around the World, Sports, Health & Fitness, Entertainment, News.
The world would be more peaceful if the military industrial lobby can be controlled in US. Lets see how it goes.
Our expenditure was merely $3B in Afghanistan, and we have earned much goodwill with the Afghan public which will stay whether Taliban stays or goes in future. We were never into sending our military any ways, despite US invitation for the same.
Ofcourse we will claim entirety of J&K till a formal agreement is concluded. You also make claim on our side of J&K.
We say Jammu and Kashmir is disputed territory according to the United Nations.
Are you claiming that Pakistani paper deliberately lied to insinuate Pakistan? Why dont you file sedition charges against the paper's editor then, instead of arguing with me?
