What's new

Biden wants Afghan exit to end US global cop role

Are you claiming that Pakistani paper deliberately lied to insinuate Pakistan? Why dont you file sedition charges against the paper's editor then, instead of arguing with me?
If RAW can influence a major Pak paper like The Nation to write 'anti-Pak propaganda', then I say our tax-payer money is being well spent :D
HAHA! why should I Trust you, you moron! :D All the princelt states like Bahwalpur and Khairpur acceded to Pakistan with their Muslim majority poopulations.

Are you saying Muslim majority Kalat do not want to be part of Pakistan. LOL :D
You are being retarded now. Muslim majority parts of Balochistan want to be part of Pakistan.
Are you claiming that Pakistani paper deliberately lied to insinuate Pakistan? Why dont you file sedition charges against the paper's editor then, instead of arguing with me?
If RAW can influence a major Pak paper like The Nation to write 'anti-Pak propaganda', then I say our tax-payer money is being well spent :D
How is RAW influencing Pakistan, you moron ! :D
Now you know you cannot say anything. According to United Nations resolutions there is supposed to be a plebiscite done Kashmir, you moron.

You keep ignoring facts and beating around the bushes.
 
. .
India's stand has been clear since the beginning as consistent with the Shimla agreement 1972. We do not entertain 3rd party involvement.
Trump tried to push his nose but was told to back off.

So US is basically admitting that the era of sole-superpower has ended. It will be led by multiple powers now.
India is not a power so time for it get out of Kashmir and listen to Biden.
 
.
The world would be more peaceful if the military industrial lobby can be controlled in US. Lets see how it goes.


Our expenditure was merely $3B in Afghanistan, and we have earned much goodwill with the Afghan public which will stay whether Taliban stays or goes in future. We were never into sending our military any ways, despite US invitation for the same.


Ofcourse we will claim entirety of J&K till a formal agreement is concluded. You also make claim on our side of J&K.

You like to speak in oxymorons, don't you? On one hand, you decry the decreased role of the United States in the united states, on the other hand, you say the world would be more peaceful. The world is more peaceful and a peaceful exit from Afghanistan is part of that. You literally typed India has no designs on other people's territory.. and now you type that we claim the whole J&k. Idk what you're smoking but you gotta lay off that shit my guy..
 
.
HAHA! why should I Trust you, you moron! :D All the princelt states like Bahwalpur and Khairpur acceded to Pakistan with their Muslim majority poopulations.

Are you saying Muslim majority Kalat do not want to be part of Pakistan. LOL :D
You are being retarded now. Muslim majority parts of Balochistan want to be part of Pakistan.
May be the entire world does not seek to form nation based merely on religion. It is not me saying that but your own Pakistani paper. Go sue them if you believe they are lying.
You like to speak in oxymorons, don't you? On one hand, you decry the decreased role of the United States in the united states, on the other hand, you say the world would be more peaceful. The world is more peaceful and a peaceful exit from Afghanistan is part of that. You literally typed India has no designs on other people's territory.. and now you type that we claim the whole J&k. Idk what you're smoking but you gotta lay off that shit my guy..
I dont think you understood me.

If US does not enter into new military conflicts, world will be more peaceful. However, once US enters, it is its responsibility to exit after it settles the matter properly. Leaving things in between creates a bigger mess like the one in Afghanistan.

India has no designs on any other nations' territory which means India will not invade other nations, unless a war is imposed on us.
However, we do claim entirety of J&K till the time the matter is legally settled. Claiming is not equivalent to invasion.
 
.
The EU has proved, via its conduct towards Pakistan, that the extension of economic incentives and their withdrawal once dependence has developed is an effective deterrence against states involved in, or negligent of, human rights violations and terrorist activity.
 
.
May be the entire world does not seek to form nation based merely on religion. It is not me saying that but your own Pakistani paper. Go sue them if you believe they are lying.

I dont think you understood me.

If US does not enter into new military conflicts, world will be more peaceful. However, once US enters, it is its responsibility to exit after it settles the matter properly. Leaving things in between creates a bigger mess like the one in Afghanistan.

India has no designs on any other nations' territory which means India will not invade other nations, unless a war is imposed on us.
However, we do claim entirety of J&K till the time the matter is legally settled. Claiming is not equivalent to invasion.

Who are you to decide how the united states should leave? It's American people's blood and tressure, not Hindu blood and tressure.. I guess the old adage applies that opinions are like assholes and everyone has one..
May be the entire world does not seek to form nation based merely on religion. It is not me saying that but your own Pakistani paper. Go sue them if you believe they are lying.

I dont think you understood me.

If US does not enter into new military conflicts, world will be more peaceful. However, once US enters, it is its responsibility to exit after it settles the matter properly. Leaving things in between creates a bigger mess like the one in Afghanistan.

India has no designs on any other nations' territory which means India will not invade other nations, unless a war is imposed on us.
However, we do claim entirety of J&K till the time the matter is legally settled. Claiming is not equivalent to invasion.
Did you not invade east pakistan?
 
.
Who are you to decide how the united states should leave? It's American people's blood and tressure, not Hindu blood and tressure.. I guess the old adage applies that opinions are like assholes and everyone has one..
I am not deciding when US should leave, just commenting on the ill-advised decision to leave in this manner.

Did you not invade east pakistan?
Millions of refugees had poured in India + we had invitation from Bangladeshi govt in exile + Pakistan fired the first shot on Dec 3rd on India + We did not invade with any ill-intention but handed over control to Bangladeshi govt after the war
 
.
A big message for India.... who been chasing US whenever Pak talks about the Kashmir issue.

I thought Pakistanis were asking for American mediation
Who are you to decide how the united states should leave? It's American people's blood and tressure, not Hindu blood and tressure.. I guess the old adage applies that opinions are like assholes and everyone has one..

Did you not invade east pakistan?

It is more like Pakistani army prevented legally elected leaders of Pakistan from taking power
 
.
Trump wanted the same. But the American liberal left was up in arms. Its sweet when our kind of guy does the same thing under a different label.
 
.
I thought Pakistanis were asking for American mediation


It is more like Pakistani army prevented legally elected leaders of Pakistan from taking power
I think you don't follow the news. Already 370 implemented by India and US kept silent.
 
.
I think you don't follow the news. Already 370 implemented by India and US kept silent.

India is fine with status quo. Pakistan wants to change the status quo and is unable to do so
Who do you think needs American help ?

US stays silent on a lot of issues
 
.
It was welcome in 1948/49 but Pakistan did not co-operate. Now it is irrelevant.


says who?..

india fully well kashmiris would opt for Pakistan, especially since the mass blood shed hindus sponsored during migration
 
.
says who?..

india fully well kashmiris would opt for Pakistan, especially since the mass blood shed hindus sponsored during migration
You know fully well that India had the support of Sheikh Abdullah led party at that time. Any referendum having only 2 options - India or Pak would have resulted in them choosing India.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom