What's new

Bhagat Singh Terrorist or freedom fighter????

u dnt need proof .. pakistans support kashmir physically, morally and politically .. Pakistan have give thousands for lives for them ,fighting a much bigger power ...We our proud of it

So you agreeing that you send armed terrorists (now we can disagree in their names.... they can be mujahideens, strategic assets but cannot be freedom fighter as they are from outside) to India..... Now that gives the legitimate right to India to protect its land from these terrorists.....
 
So you agreeing that you send armed terrorists (now we can disagree in their names.... they can be mujahideens, strategic assets but cannot be freedom fighter as they are from outside) to India..... Now that gives the legitimate right to India to protect its land from these terrorists.....
it doesnt matter whether he agrees or not
the thing is even he knows that Pakistan is abetting and supporting terrorists who are responsible for the death of thousands of the kashmiris
and he says he is proud of it

what an irony
a freedom movement which is meant to safeguard the interests of kashmiris is instead killing them and taking them backwards
 
Well he was considered a terrorist in the eyes of the indian govt during british rule in india. Gandhi or Quaid-E-Azam were freedom fighters who did not kill anyone but fought for freedom.
 
Well he was considered a terrorist in the eyes of the indian govt during british rule in india. Gandhi or Quaid-E-Azam were freedom fighters who did not kill anyone but fought for freedom.
so,how do you see Bhagat Singh????
 
the OP is trying to justify the stance of kashmiris
i dont think anyone in Pak considers Bhagat Singh as a terrorist

3-4 months b4,i myself had posted a thread about how Pakistani govt was spending 80 millions to renovate Bhagat Singh's house and the nearby areas

See, they are pushing everything under carpet of Terrorism, be it Kashmir, 26/11. One memeber equated it to the IM too.

The attempt is clearly to confuse people of who is a terrorist and who is not, just like what is happening in Pakistan.

They want to use the person respected all over India to ignite a small doubt in the mind of Indians. Do they care who they used? No.

Cause if they did, comparing him to a terrorist is the most abhorrent thing one can think of.
 
thats where the difference lies the most . . Bhagat singh ji never said he is against a particular religion.

by your logic he and his fellows should have targeted every Xtian living in India?
im talking about a phenomiana ..like muslims faced racism due to attack on west by alqeeda.. most of the muslims didnt even know about taliban before 9/11 .. but due to the acts of alqeeda every muslim face alil raciusms .. like muslims faced problems in indian bcoz they voted for Pakistan in 1945-46 election ... same way when kashmirs see that that hindu country who attacked them .. they reacted on pandits
 
im talking about a phenomiana ..like muslims faced racism due to attack on west by alqeeda.. most of the muslims didnt even know about taliban before 9/11 .. but due to the acts of alqeeda every muslim face alil raciusms .. like muslims faced problems in indian bcoz they voted for Pakistan in 1945-46 election ... same way when kashmirs see that that hindu country who attacked them .. they reacted on pandits

Bade bhai,

these type of stupid reasonings to take out anger is like a two way sword.

Pundits are the natives as well with equal rights of the land of kashmir. chasing them away weakens their justification of freedom fighting. :)
 
.. like muslims faced problems in indian bcoz they voted for Pakistan in 1945-46 election ... same way when kashmirs see that that hindu country who attacked them .. they reacted on pandits

You have any idea when the pandits where thrown out?
 
im talking about a phenomiana ..like muslims faced racism due to attack on west by alqeeda.. most of the muslims didnt even know about taliban before 9/11 .. but due to the acts of alqeeda every muslim face alil raciusms .. like muslims faced problems in indian bcoz they voted for Pakistan in 1945-46 election ... same way when kashmirs see that that hindu country who attacked them .. they reacted on pandits
Oh, but what about the anti Pundit riots before independence? :azn: Find some other excuse. There are plenty.
 
1-we dont care about balochis...........its tit for tat situation
if you start messing up with our people,we will start doing the same with yours

2-how many mass graves are in kashmir...........how many have been killed there
compare it with the rest of the country
highlighting a certain issue does makes it look bigger.......but actually it isnt
answer me.....how many have been killed in the last year from 23 Aug 2013 to 23 Aug 2014
give a source to back that up

3-you gave a part of gilgit to china on lease,we havent
this again proves.......you dont care about kashmiris.........
how could you????
geelani......lol.......supporting Pak but availing all Indian facillities
there is only 10 percent who want to be part of Pak acc. to last referrendum
dont give me that bullshit that they want to be a part of Pak bcoz of the brotherhood

4-kashmiris consider them as an Indian colony
but they study in India with various scholarships
they work in Indian sectors
they receive more budget than what they give as tax to India

how cute
all the part is useless but the last part i will answer ..
well nehru did go to UK for studies so does that mean he shouldn't stand up against them??? look on the bright side ..give them what they want ...Freedo!!! then u dnt have to spend all the budget u brag about or the scholarship .. they dont want that buddy .. like all indians were recruited in indian army, police and government service during british rule ..they were all paid and enjoyed the facilities ... so that means they shouldnt granted u freedom???? what kinda of stupid logic are u using
 
. so that means they shouldnt granted u freedom????

Freedom for what????? They have freedom for everything other than revolting against their country.........
 
Bade bhai,

these type of stupid reasonings to take out anger is like a two way sword.

Pundits are the natives as well with equal rights of the land of kashmir. chasing them away weakens their justification of freedom fighting. :)
well not really... most of them left in 90's ..so keeping them for 40 nyears didnt made any difference bhie jaan ;)
 
all the part is useless but the last part i will answer ..
well nehru did go to UK for studies so does that mean he shouldn't stand up against them??? look on the bright side ..give them what they want ...Freedo!!! then u dnt have to spend all the budget u brag about or the scholarship .. they dont want that buddy .. like all indians were recruited in indian army, police and government service during british rule ..they were all paid and enjoyed the facilities ... so that means they shouldnt granted u freedom???? what kinda of stupid logic are u using
my dear friend.......we are not recruiting them
they are coming with their own will

they are voting for their parties

a group of 1000,2000 people doesnt represent the entire kashmir
kashmir is also home to kashmiri pandits who wants to be a part of India


and the rest..........you dont have enuff sources to prove what you were claiming,hence you chose not to reply
 
Freedom for what????? They have freedom for everything other than revolting against their country.........
Ohhh by that definition india had freedom in british rule as well .. so why did we go through so much trouble .. indians didnt wanted to be ruled by britishers and kashmirs didnt wanted to be ruled by india .. u considered them occupiers and they considered u the aggressors ... how i dnt knw how u guys come up with this BS logic to justify ur occupation
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom